|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:711-718 © 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |

* Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Leicester, Glenfield Campus, Leicester, United Kingdom
Department of Cell Physiology and Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leicester, Glenfield Campus, Leicester, United Kingdom
Manuscript received June 6, 2000; revised manuscript received September 28, 2000, accepted November 3, 2000.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Professor Manuel Galiñanes, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Leicester, Glenfield Campus, Leicester LE3 9QP, United Kingdom
mg50{at}leicester.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We investigated the effects of ischemic preconditioning (PC) on diabetic and failing human myocardium and the role of mitochondrial KATP channels on the response in these diseased tissues.
BACKGROUND
There is conflicting evidence to suggest that PC is a healthy heart phenomenon.
METHODS
Right atrial appendages were obtained from seven different groups of patients: nondiabetics, diet-controlled diabetics, noninsulin-dependent diabetics (NIDD) receiving KATP channel blockers, insulin-dependent diabetics (IDD), and patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >50%, LVEF between 30% and 50% and LVEF <30%. After stabilization, the muscle slices were randomized into five experimental groups (n = 6/group): 1) aerobic controlincubated in oxygenated buffer for 210 min, 2) ischemia alone90 min ischemia followed by 120 min reoxygenation, 3) preconditioning by 5 min ischemia/5 min reoxygenation before 90 min ischemia/120 min reoxygenation, 4) diazoxide (Mito KATP opener, 0.1 mm)for 10 min before the 90 min ischemia/120 min reoxygenation and 5) glibenclamide (10 µm)10 min exposure prior to PC (only in the diabetic patient groups). Creatine kinase leakage into the medium (CK, U/g wet wt) and MTT reduction (OD/mg wet wt), an index of cell viability, were assessed at the end of the experiment.
RESULTS
Ischemia caused similar injury in both normal and diseased tissue. Preconditioning prevented the effects of ischemia in all groups except NIDD, IDD and poor cardiac function (<30%). In the diazoxide-treated groups, protection was mimicked in all groups except the NIDD and IDD groups. Interestingly, glybenclamide abolished protection in nondiabetic and diet-controlled NIDD groups and did not affect NIDD groups receiving KATP channel blockers or IDD groups.
CONCLUSIONS
These results show that failure to precondition the diabetic heart is due to dysfunction of the mitochondrial KATP channels and that the mechanism of failure in the diabetic heart lies in elements of the signal transduction pathway different from the mitochondrial KATP channels.
| ||||||||||||||||||||
2 h) and a delayed or second window of protection (
24 h). The underlying mechanism of PC has been extensively investigated; however, the basis of such cardioprotection is not fully elucidated. The most favored hypothesis for the first window of PC suggests that a variety of endogenous ligands such as adenosine, bradykinin, catecholamines and opoids activate receptors linked to protein kinase C (PKC) to initiate an intracellular signal transduction pathway. Protein kinase C may activate a tyrosine kinase, which in turn activates mitogen-activated protein or c-Jun-N-terminal kinases (JNK) kinases leading to phosphorylation of KATP channels (1). There is convincing evidence in the literature that KATP channels are involved in the protection of ischemic PC in the human myocardium (2,3), although the exact place of these channels in the signal transduction pathway is still unclear (46). Recently we have shown that the mitochondrial, not the sarcolemmal, KATP channel is responsible for this powerful protective mechanism in the human myocardium (7). Within the enormous amount of research describing the cellular basis of the PC response, relatively few studies relevant to coronary artery disease in humans have focused on the effect of PC in hearts with concurrent abnormalities. More importantly, even amongst those studies, the conclusions have been conflicting. Clinical studies identify a number of conditions that increase mortality from myocardial infarction; these include heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, aging and hypercholesterolemia (8,9). It is plausible that these conditions interfere with the biochemical pathways underlying the PC response.
Cardiovascular disease associated with diabetes mellitus is a major cause of death in patients with diabetes (10). In the vast majority of animal studies, diabetic hearts demonstrate a reduced tolerance to anoxia, hypoxia or ischemia (1113), but studies that have investigated the effect of preconditioning on diabetic hearts have yielded confusing data. Tosaki et al. (14) have shown in the streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat heart that PC does not confer cardiac protection. Their results were opposed to those of Liu et al. (15), who had earlier shown, also in the rat heart, that myocardial infarction is reduced in diabetes and that PC further increases the protection of these hearts. There are very few studies in human diabetic tissue. Cleveland et al. (16) used a functional isolated atrial trabeculae model and showed that PC did not confer any protection of the myocardium on patients taking long-term oral hypoglycemic agents. They hypothesized that long-term inhibition of KATP channels with these agents may be responsible for the excess cardiovascular mortality associated with diabetes.
Heart failure is common in all forms of heart disease. Mechanical dysfunction of the failing heart is due to many factors, including neurohormonal disturbance, accumulation of extracellular matrix, alteration of excitation-contraction coupling and maladaptation of myocardial energetics (17). Very few studies have investigated the effects of the PC response in the failing myocardium in light of alterations in the cellular metabolic and biochemical pathways associated with heart failure. Cleveland et al. (3) showed in isolated ventricular trabeculae from patients requiring heart transplantation that PC conferred protection. However, more recently Dekker et al. (18) have studied perfused papillary muscles from rabbits in which cardiac failure has been induced by a combination of pressure and volume overloading. The end points used to assess responses to ischemia, namely the time to onset of a rise in the intracellular concentration of Ca2+ (cellular uncoupling) and of ischemic contracture, were delayed by PC in normal myocardium but were exaggerated by PC in the failing myocardium.
The aims of the present study were 1) to investigate the effects of PC on the diabetic and failing human myocardium, and 2) to investigate the role of mitochondrial KATP channels in the responses of these pathological conditions. These studies were carried out in an in vitro model of human right atrial myocardium of simulated ischemia and reoxygenation.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Experimental protocols. After the atrium was sectioned, the preparations were allowed to stabilize for 30 min and then randomly allocated to various protocols. In all studies simulated ischemia was induced for 90 min followed by 120 min of reoxygenation. The drugs were applied to the sections for 10 min after the initial 30 min of stabilization and then removed before ischemia. Two studies were performed:
Study 1
To investigate whether diabetes influences the protective effect of PC, atrial specimens were collected from four groups of patients: nondiabetics, diet-controlled diabetics (DCD), noninsulin-dependent diabetics (NIDD) on long-term oral suplhonylureas and insulin-dependent diabetics (IDD). Preparations from each group were then randomly allocated to various protocols (n = 6/group) shown in Figure 1.
|
|
Assessment of tissue injury and viability. At the end of each experimental protocol, tissue injury was determined by measuring the leakage of creatine kinase (CK) into the incubation medium and tissue viability by the reduction of 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) to blue formazan product.
CK leakage
The activity of CK leakage into the medium during the reperfusion period was assayed by a kinetic ultraviolet method based on the formation of NAD (Sigma Catalogue No. 1340-K) at 37°C and the results expressed as U/g wet wt.
MTT reduction
At the end of the experimental time, the tissue was loaded into a Falcon conical tube (15 ml, Becton Dickinson Labware, Cowley, United Kingdom) and 2 ml of phosphate buffer solution (0.05 m) containing MTT (1.25 mg/ml, 3 mm at final concentration) was added, incubated for 30 min at 37°C and then homogenized in 2 ml dimethyl sulfoxide (Homogenizer Ultra-Turrax T25, dispersing tool G8, IKA-Labortechnic, Staufen, Germany) at 9,500 rpm for 1 min. The homogenate was then centrifuged at 1,000 g for 10 min and 0.2 ml of the supernatant was dispensed into a 98-well flat-bottom microtiter plate (Nunc Brand Products, Roskilde, Denmark). After this, the absorbance was measured on a plate reader (Benchmark, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California) at 550 nm and the results expressed as OD/mg wet wt.
Statistical analysis. All data are presented as mean ± SEM. All values were compared by two-way analysis of variance with application of a post hoc Bonferronis test. Statistical significance was assumed at the p < 0.05 level.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effect of PC in diabetes (study 1). Figure 3A shows that CK leakage was increased to a similar degree by ischemia alone in all study groups. It also shows that PC completely reversed the effect of ischemia in the nondiabetics and DCD groups, so that mean CK leakage values were similar to those in the aerobic control group, but did not have a protective effect in NIDD and IDDM groups. Interestingly, diazoxide, a specific mito KATP channel opener, mimicked the protection afforded by PC in nondiabetics and DCD groups but failed to protect the NIDD and IDD groups. As expected, glibenclamide, a nonspecific KATP channel blocker, abolished the protection of PC in nondiabetics and in DCD and had no effect in the NIDD and IDD groups. The MTT results shown in Figure 3B are a mirror image of the CK leakage results with PC and diazoxide exhibiting a similar protection in the nondiabetic and DCD groups and no protection in the NIDD and IDD groups. Overall, the results suggest that changes in mito KATP channels in patients with NIDD and IDD are the most likely cause for the failure to precondition the myocardium. However, the possibility that alterations in signal transduction pathways could also contribute cannot be completely excluded.
|
30% but not in the group with LVEF <30%. As observed in study 1, diazoxide mimicked the effect of PC on CK leakage in the groups with LVEF
30%. However, in contrast with the absence of protection by PC in the group with LVEF <30%, diazoxide reduced CK leakage in the LVEF <30% group to an extent similar to that seen in LVEF
30% groups. The results on MTT reduction shown in Figure 4B were again a mirror image of the CK leakage, suggesting that the cause for the absence of protection by PC in the LVEF <30% group is probably due to alterations in some element(s) of the signal transduction pathway that exclude the mito KATP channels.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preconditioning and diabetes. Insulin regulates the balance of energy substrates available to the heart and also regulates metabolism and myocardial perfusion via actions on various intracellular regulatory proteins and messenger systems (22). It is therefore conceivable that diabetes may affect ischemic injury. However, our results show that the diabetic human myocardium is not more sensitive to lethal ischemic injury than the nondiabetic myocardium under the conditions of the present study. Because epidemiological studies have clearly shown that patients with either IDD or NIDD are more prone to develop myocardial infarction and postinfarction complications (10,23), it may be argued that the cause of cardiac complications in diabetics is not the tolerance of the heart to ischemia. The literature is inconsistent with respect to how susceptible the hearts of diabetic animals are to injury from ischemia/reperfusion, and whereas some studies have observed a greater susceptibility to ischemia/reperfusion injury (15), others have reported no significant effect (24,25). The divergent results may be explained by experimental differences, but if our results in the human atrial myocardium can be confirmed in ventricular myocardium then our attention to reduce cardiac complications in diabetes should be centered in the context of blood components and the vasculature rather than in the own myocardium.
Our studies have demonstrated that PC affords protection of the myocardium from patients with DCD but that this is lost when patients are on long-term hypoglycemics or become insulin dependent. These results are in agreement with those reported by Cleveland et al. (16). These investigators showed that myocardium from patients with diabetes on long-term KATP blockers also does not precondition in a model of myocardial stunning. However, the same authors also suggested that the myocardium from IDD subjects can be preconditioned, although the protective effect obtained was not to the same extent as that in nondiabetics. Again, these results in the human tissue contrast with the reported experimental results. Liu and co-workers (15) were the first to examine preconditioning in experimental streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats and found that diabetic hearts were more resistant to infarction than normal control hearts and that preconditioning conferred additional protection under in vivo experimental conditions. However, a subsequent study examined the effect of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on the response to ischemia/reperfusion and preconditioning in the isolated rat heart at different stages following its induction (26) and showed that the diabetic heart is more resistant to ischemia/reperfusion in the early phase of the diabetes (two weeks after onset); but that this protection is lost by four to six weeks. In addition, they observed that the diabetic heart can be preconditioned after six to eight weeks. It must be mentioned that the disparity in the results observed between the two studies could be explained, at least in part, by the differences in the models used. Thus, for example, in the study by Liu and colleagues the model of diabetes is unique in that diabetes was induced by streptozotocin in the neonate and then animals were allowed to grow into adulthood before any intervention was carried out.
These studies do not provide an explanation for such a disparity of results; however, they suggest that abnormalities of mito KATP channels may be responsible for the failure to precondition the myocardium of diabetics. Several investigators (27,28), including ourselves (7), have previously demonstrated that mito KATP channels are involved in the protection of ischemic PC. The findings by Smith et al. (29) that KATP channels are altered, with a greater outward single-channel current in the ventricular myocardium of diabetic rats, further support this thesis. Clearly, further research is needed to fully elucidate how the alteration of this channel contributes to the failure to precondition the myocardium of diabetics.
Preconditioning and the failing heart. Left ventricular hypertrophy and LV chamber dilation are among the compensatory mechanisms of the failing heart. There is experimental evidence that the hypertrophied myocardium is at greater risk from ischemia/reperfusion injury, and it is generally believed that the failing heart is less tolerant to such injury. Our results, however, have shown for the first time that the effects of ischemia/reoxygenation are similar in the failing and nonfailing myocardium. In addition, we have also demonstrated for the first time that the myocardium from hearts exhibiting a LVEF <30% cannot be preconditioned. Our results contrast with those of Cleveland et al. (3) showing that the isolated ventricular trabeculae obtained from patients undergoing cardiac transplantation can be preconditioned. Again, the explanation for this difference cannot be found in the reported experimental studies, and whereas some investigators have shown protection of the failing heart by PC (3), others have observed no effect (30) or even further tissue damage (18). The diversity of results is not entirely surprising because of the lack of uniformity of experimental design and the degree of heart failure we have shown in this study.
The protection observed with diazoxide in the myocardium from hearts with LVEF <30% was commensurate with the protection induced by PC in the myocardium from nonfailing hearts. This supports the thesis that the failure to precondition the failing human heart is not due to an alteration in the response of the mitochondrial KATP channel but is caused by abnormalities in other elements of the preconditioning signaling pathway. Considerable evidence indicates that PKC is intimately involved in ischemic PC (31), and the failure to precondition the failing heart may be due to the chronic activation of PKC observed in this condition (32). There are several PKC isoforms, some of which have been involved with PC, and in future studies the type of isoforms and their expression in the myocardium of the failing heart should be investigated. Indeed, if specific PKC isoforms are proved to be responsible for the failure to precondition, then their manipulation could become a therapeutic intervention to reduce myocardial injury in ischemia/reperfusion of the failing heart.
Possible limitations of the study and clinical implications. A potential limitation of our study was the use of atrial tissue as opposed to ventricular myocardium, and therefore any extrapolation must be conducted with caution; however, Yellon and colleagues have suggested that PC exerts identical protection in atrial and ventricular myocardium (2). The present study also used atrial tissue to characterize the effects of ischemia and reperfusion in the failing and diabetic human myocardium. However, atrial and ventricular myocardium possess characteristics of their own that may influence susceptibility to ischemia/reperfusion injury, and as a consequence results from one may not be applicable to the other. Thus the reported differences in the distribution of potassium channels (33,34), which contribute to the characteristic differences between atrial and ventricular action potentials, may determine a different response to ischemia/reperfusion. Undoubtedly, KATP channels are present in both atrium and ventricle (33), although their density in both tissues is unknown. It must also be mentioned that the preparation is superfused ("simulated ischemia") as opposed to being arterially perfused, and simulated ischemia is achieved by removal of oxygen and blocking glycolytic ATP production with 2-deoxyglucose. This results in metabolic conditions within the myocardium that may be different from those that occur in the myocardium during clinical ischemia.
Another limitation might be that right atrial appendages were obtained from patients subjected to various medical treatments (e.g., nitrates, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists), which may have influenced ischemia/reperfusion injury and the protection induced by PC. However, it should be emphasized that all medication was stopped the day before surgery when specimens were taken for the study, and that significant effect of the medication was unlikely because all preparations responded to ischemia/reperfusion with a similar degree of injury. The preparation used in this study was not electrically stimulated (i.e., nonbeating) and therefore one should be cautious when extrapolating to the in vivo situation.
Conclusions. Preconditioning is a potent protective intervention whose use has been advocated in clinical situations such as angioplasty and cardiac surgery. The results of our studies have obvious clinical implications in that PC cannot be beneficial to patients with NIDD or IDD and those with cardiac failure. The results also show that in the failing heart a degree of protection similar to that seen with PC can be obtained by the administration of a selective opener of mito KATP channels, an intervention that is not effective in diabetics.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Feng, E. Lucchinetti, G. Fischer, M. Zhu, K. Zaugg, M. C. Schaub, and M. Zaugg Cardiac remodelling hinders activation of cyclooxygenase-2, diminishing protection by delayed pharmacological preconditioning: role of HIF1{alpha} and CREB Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2008; 78(1): 98 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Mentzer Jr, M. S. Jahania, and R. D. Lasley Myocardial Protection Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 443 - 464. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lucchinetti, M. Jamnicki, G. Fischer, and M. Zaugg Preconditioning by Isoflurane Retains Its Protection Against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Postinfarct Remodeled Rat Hearts Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 17 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ferdinandy, R. Schulz, and G. F. Baxter Interaction of Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury, Preconditioning, and Postconditioning Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2007; 59(4): 418 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Boengler, I. Konietzka, A. Buechert, Y. Heinen, D. Garcia-Dorado, G. Heusch, and R. Schulz Loss of ischemic preconditioning's cardioprotection in aged mouse hearts is associated with reduced gap junctional and mitochondrial levels of connexin 43 Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): H1764 - H1769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Podgorska, K. Kocbuch, M. Grden, A. Szutowicz, and T. Pawelczyk Reduced ability to release adenosine by diabetic rat cardiac fibroblasts due to altered expression of nucleoside transporters J. Physiol., October 1, 2006; 576(1): 179 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Valensi and G. Slama Review: Sulphonylureas and cardiovascular risk: facts and controversies The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, July 1, 2006; 6(4): 159 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Kloner and S. H. Rezkalla Preconditioning, postconditioning and their application to clinical cardiology Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2006; 70(2): 297 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hassouna, M. Loubani, B. M. Matata, A. Fowler, N. B. Standen, and M. Galinanes Mitochondrial dysfunction as the cause of the failure to precondition the diabetic human myocardium Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2006; 69(2): 450 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Monteiro, L. Goncalves, and L. A Providencia Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: the road to cardioprotection Heart, December 1, 2005; 91(12): 1621 - 1625. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Boengler, G. Dodoni, A. Rodriguez-Sinovas, A. Cabestrero, M. Ruiz-Meana, P. Gres, I. Konietzka, C. Lopez-Iglesias, D. Garcia-Dorado, F. Di Lisa, et al. Connexin 43 in cardiomyocyte mitochondria and its increase by ischemic preconditioning Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2005; 67(2): 234 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Liem, M. te Lintel Hekkert, O. C. Manintveld, F. Boomsma, P. D. Verdouw, and D. J. Duncker Myocardium tolerant to an adenosine-dependent ischemic preconditioning stimulus can still be protected by stimuli that employ alternative signaling pathways Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1165 - H1172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ad, A. Schneider, I. Khaliulin, J. B. Borman, and H. Schwalb Impaired mitochondrial response to simulated ischemic injury as a predictor of the development of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: In vitro study in human myocardium J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2005; 129(1): 41 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hassouna, B. M. Matata, and M. Galinanes PKC-{epsilon} is upstream and PKC-{alpha} is downstream of mitoKATP channels in the signal transduction pathway of ischemic preconditioning of human myocardium Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): C1418 - C1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Solomon, N. S. Anavekar, S. Greaves, J. L. Rouleau, C. Hennekens, M. A. Pfeffer, and HEART Investigators Angina pectoris prior to myocardial infarction protects against subsequent left ventricular remodeling J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2004; 43(9): 1511 - 1514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Galinanes and A. G Fowler Role of clinical pathologies in myocardial injury following ischaemia and reperfusion Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2004; 61(3): 512 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schneider, N. Ad, U. Izhar, I. Khaliulin, J. B. Borman, and H. Schwalb Protection of myocardium by cyclosporin A and insulin: in vitro simulated ischemia study in human myocardium Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 76(4): 1240 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zaugg, E. Lucchinetti, C. Garcia, T. Pasch, D. R. Spahn, and M. C. Schaub Anaesthetics and cardiac preconditioning. Part II. Clinical implications Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2003; 91(4): 566 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Bartling, I. Friedrich, R.-E. Silber, and A. Simm Ischemic preconditioning is not cardioprotective in senescent human myocardium Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 105 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Haist, C. N. Hirst, and M. Karmazyn Effective protection by NHE-1 inhibition in ischemic and reperfused heart under preconditioning blockade Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): H798 - H803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-M. Lee and T.-F. Chou Impairment of Myocardial Protection in Type 2 Diabetic Patients J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 531 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Pawelczyk, M. Podgorska, and M. Sakowicz The Effect of Insulin on Expression Level of Nucleoside Transporters in Diabetic Rats Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2003; 63(1): 81 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Mentzer Jr., M. S. Jahania, and R. D. Lasley Myocardial Protection Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 413 - 438. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Loubani and M. Galinanes Long-term administration of nicorandil abolishes ischemic and pharmacologic preconditioning of the human myocardium: Role of mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2002; 124(4): 750 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A Kloner, M. T Speakman, and K. Przyklenk Ischemic preconditioning: a plea for rationally targeted clinical trials Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2002; 55(3): 526 - 533. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. F del Valle, E. C Lascano, and J. A Negroni Ischemic preconditioning protection against stunning in conscious diabetic sheep: role of glucose, insulin, sarcolemmal and mitochondrial KATP channels Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2002; 55(3): 642 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Smith Jr, D. Faxon, W. Cascio, H. Schaff, T. Gardner, A. Jacobs, S. Nissen, and R. Stouffer Prevention Conference VI: Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Writing Group VI: Revascularization in Diabetic Patients Circulation, May 7, 2002; 105 (18): e165 - e169. [Full Text] [PDF] |