cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:458-462
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lahiri, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lahiri, A.

CLINICAL STUDY: CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

Enhanced detection of reversible perfusion defects by Tc-99m sestamibi compared to Tc-99m tetrofosmin during vasodilator stress SPECT imaging in mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease

Prem Soman, MD, PhD, MRCP*, Raymond Taillefer, MD, FRCP(C){dagger}, E. Gordon DePuey, MD, FACC{ddagger}, James E. Udelson, MD, FACC§ and Avijit Lahiri, MBBS, MSc, MRCP, FESC, FACC*

* Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Northwick Park & St. Marks Hospitals, NHS Trust and Institute of Medical Research, Harrow, United Kingdom
{dagger} Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hotel-Dieu De Montreal, Quebec, Canada
{ddagger} Division of Nuclear Medicine, St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, New York, USA
§ Division of Cardiology, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Manuscript received August 4, 1999; revised manuscript received September 8, 2000, accepted October 12, 2000.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Avijit Lahiri, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, United Kingdom, HA1 3UJ


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES

We prospectively compared dipyridamole single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging with Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin for the detection of reversible perfusion defects in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

Tc-99m tetrofosmin has a lower first-pass myocardial extraction fraction compared to Tc-99m sestamibi and thus could underestimate mild perfusion defects.

METHODS

Eighty-one patients with 50% to 90% stenosis in one or two major epicardial vessels without previous myocardial infarction, and seven with <5% probability of coronary artery disease underwent dipyridamole SPECT imaging with both agents. The SPECT data were analyzed quantitatively.

RESULTS

Tc-99m sestamibi detected reversible perfusion defects in a greater number of segments (total 363 and 285, p < 0.001, and mean ± SD, 2.2 ± 3.0 and 1.8 ± 2.5 per patient, p = 0.008, for Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin, respectively), demonstrated a larger extent of perfusion defect (mean ± SD, 15.8% ± 12.3% and 12.0% ± 11.4%, p < 0.03, for Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin, respectively) and more often correctly identified patients with disease in more than one coronary artery (p = 0.02). There was better defect contrast with Tc-99m sestamibi (defect/normal wall count ratios were 0.60 ± 0.15 vs. 0.73 ± 0.14 for Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc99m tetrofosmin, respectively, p = 0.01, for reversible defects seen in identical segments with both agents; and 0.73 ± 0.16 vs 0.79 ± 0.17, respectively, p <0.01, for reversible defects detected with either agent alone). There was no significant difference in diagnostic sensitivity or image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

These differences between two commonly used tracers may have significant diagnostic and prognostic implications.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  CAD = coronary artery disease
  SPECT = single-photon emission computed tomography


Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin have similar physical properties that offer significant advantages over thallium-201 for gamma camera imaging (1–3). However, the myocardial extraction fraction of Tc-99m tetrofosmin is lower than that of Tc-99m sestamibi, and there is a relatively earlier "roll off" in the linear relationship between tracer uptake and myocardial blood flow for Tc-99m tetrofosmin (4), which could result in underestimation of perfusion abnormalities (5). Although two recent comparative studies of these two agents suggested diagnostic equivalence (6,7), they have never been compared specifically using vasodilator stress testing in patients with mild coronary disease, conditions in which the effects of a low myocardial extraction fraction are most likely to manifest (4,5,8,9).

Therefore, this study was designed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the detection of reversible perfusion abnormalities induced by dipyridamole stress in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease (CAD).


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient selection.   Patients with mild-to-moderate stable CAD, defined as 50% to 90% stenosis in one or two major epicardial coronary arteries on recent (<2 months) qualitative coronary arteriography, who consented to participate, were prospectively enrolled. In addition, patients with a low likelihood (<5% pretest probability) (10) of CAD were also included to eliminate reporting bias. Exclusion criteria included severe coronary disease (left main stem disease, >90% stenosis in any artery, three-vessel disease), previous myocardial infarction, significant valvular disease, left bundle branch block and clinically unstable CAD. Standard exclusion criteria for dipyridamole stress were applied (11).

Study design.   The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of both institutions. After informed consent, all patients underwent dipyridamole stress SPECT imaging with Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin in random order within two weeks of each other. A two-day (U.K.) or same-day (Canada) rest-stress protocol was used (12), with individual patients subjected to the same protocol for imaging with both agents. Perfusion imaging was performed within two months of coronary arteriography.

Dipyridamole stress.   The standard high-dose dipyridamole protocol (0.56 mg/kg, followed by 0.28mg/kg in the absence of adverse effects) was used (13). In any given patient the same dose of dipyridamole was used for imaging with both agents, and the tracer was injected 2 to 3 min after the completion of the infusion.

SPECT imaging.   For the two-day stress rest protocol, 16 mCi of tracer was injected on each occasion. In the one-day protocol rest images were initially performed with 10 mCi of tracer followed 4 h later by the stress study with 30 mCi of tracer. SPECT imaging was performed 60 min after tracer injection with a large field-of-view, dual-headed gamma camera equipped with a high-resolution collimator using methods previously described (14).

Image analysis
The SPECT images were analyzed by two independent experts (EGD, JEU) blinded to the patient’s clinical details and tracer identity. The Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin scans of any given patient were read randomly. The left ventricle was divided into 17 segments on three short axes and one vertical long axis slices, and each segment was graded according to perfusion using a semiquantitative four-point system (1 = normal, 2 = mildly reduced, 3 = severely reduced, 4 = absent), and classified as normal, reversible (new or worsening stress defect) or fixed (identical stress and rest defects). The overall image quality was assigned one of four grades (excellent, good, fair, poor) based on count density, myocardial and left ventricular cavity definition and adjacent interfering visceral activity.

Quantitative analysis
The extent of defect was quantified using CEqual software (15) as a percentage of the entire myocardium involved. The defect/normal wall activity ratio was used to calculate the severity of the defect and was determined in two groups of patients: those in whom reversible perfusion defects in identical segments were detected by both Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin, and those in whom reversible defects were detected by one agent only. For this analysis, we summed four short axis slices, taking care to choose identical slices from Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin images of any given patient. Regions of interest were then placed manually on the area of defect and the area of the myocardium with the maximum tracer uptake, with the operator blinded to the tracer identity. By determining the count densities within the defect and normal regions of interest for each defect, a mean defect/normal count density ratio was computed. The average of three values was taken.

Statistical analysis
Sensitivity and specificity were determined using standard formulae and compared using the McNemar test. The concordance between tetrofosmin and sestamibi for classifying scans (overall and segmental) into normal, reversible and fixed categories and for overall image quality was determined with kappa statistics. The difference in the average number of reversible segments detected per patient was compared using the paired t test. Comparison of the two agents for diagnostic categorization was performed using the Stuart–Maxwell test (16) of marginal homogeneity (paired comparison of the row totals with the column totals, to see whether the two agents classify the same proportion of patients into the three categories) and Bowker’s test for symmetry (17) (a comparison of the symmetry of individual cells about the table diagonal), and image quality was compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Eighty-eight patients (63 men, 25 women) were included in the study. The mean age was 59.7 ± 12 years and mean weight 76.2 ± 15.4 kg. Fifty-eight and 30 patients were recruited at the U.K. and Canadian sites, respectively; 40 had the Tc-99m tetrofosmin scan performed first.

Coronary anatomy.   Eighty-one patients had 50% to 90% stenosis in one or two major epicardial coronary arteries; 52 had single and 29 two-vessel disease. One patient had normal coronary arteries and six patients were not subjected to arteriography because of <5% pretest likelihood of coronary disease.

Hemodynamics during stress testing.   There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters during stress testing with Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin (p = NS for rest and peak heart rate and blood pressure).

Detection of reversible perfusion defects.   Tc-99m sestamibi demonstrated reversible perfusion defects in a significantly greater number of myocardial segments (363 and 285 reversible segments by Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin, respectively, p < 0.0001, Table 1). Additional analysis of the U.K. subgroup showed that the average number of reversible segments detected per patient was 2.2 ± 3.0 and 1.8 ± 2.5 for Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin, respectively (p = 0.008, 95% CI for the difference 0.12–0.78). However, even though Tc-99m sestamibi demonstrated reversible perfusion defects in 50 patients compared with 45 by tetrofosmin, this difference did not achieve statistical significance.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Ischemic Burden Demonstrated by Tc-99m Sestamibi (MIBI) and Tc-99m Tetrofosmin (TETRO) in Mild to Moderate Coronary Artery Disease

 
Extent and severity of perfusion defects.   The extent of perfusion abnormality demonstrated by Tc-99m sestamibi was also significantly greater compared with Tc-99m tetrofosmin (15.8 ± 12.3% and 12.0 ± 11.4%, respectively, p < 0.01). In patients in whom both Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin studies showed reversible perfusion defects in identical segments, the defect/normal wall ratio was 0.60 ± 0.15 for Tc-99m sestamibi and 0.73 ± 0.14 for Tc-99m tetrofosmin (p = 0.01). In patients where reversible perfusion defects were not detected concordantly by both agents, the defect/normal wall ratio was 0.73 ± 0.16 for Tc-99m sestamibi and 0.79 ± 0.17 for Tc-99m tetrofosmin (p < 0.01, Table 2), indicating that Tc-99m sestamibi demonstrated perfusion defects of greater severity. Figures 1 and 2 show SPECT images from two patients with CAD in whom Tc-99m sestamibi demonstrated greater defect extent, severity and reversibility.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Segmental Analysis of Perfusion Defects in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Coronary Artery Disease

 


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Representative horizontal and vertical long axes slices from the Tc-99m tetrofosmin (TETRO) and Tc-99m sestamibi (MIBI) stress (S) and rest (R) SPECT images of a 67-year-old female patient with a 50% stenosis of her mid left anterior descending coronary artery and 90% stenosis of the proximal left circumflex coronary artery. There are infero-apical and lateral defects in the Tc-99m sestamibi scan while the Tc-99m tetrofosmin scan is only mildly abnormal.

 


View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Representative horizontal and vertical long axes, and short axis slices from the Tc-99m tetrofosmin (TETRO) and Tc-99m sestamibi (MIBI) stress (S) and rest (R) SPECT images of a 64-year-old man with 90% stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. The perfusion abnormality involving the apex, septum, and anterior walls is more severe and extensive on the Tc-99m sestamibi scan.

 
Concordance for categorization of defects.   The overall concordance between Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin for categorizing normal, fixed and reversible scans was 78% (69/88, kappa = 0.60). Among patients with angiographic coronary disease, ten scans were positive by Tc-99m sestamibi (nine reversible, one fixed) and normal by Tc-99m tetrofosmin. In contrast, six scans were abnormal by Tc-99m tetrofosmin (five reversible, one fixed) and normal by Tc-99m sestamibi; of these, only four patients had angiographic coronary disease and two scans were false positive (p = NS).

On a segmental basis, the concordance for similar categorization was 86% (1,291/1,496, kappa = 0.67). Of 119 segments classified as normal by Tc-99m tetrofosmin, Tc-99m sestamibi demonstrated reversible and fixed defects in 101 and 18 segments, respectively. In contrast, there were only 54 segments classified as normal by Tc-99m sestamibi where Tc-99m tetrofosmin detected abnormalities (49 reversible, five fixed; p < 0.001 by both Stuart-Maxwell and Bowker’s tests, Table 2).

Prediction of two-vessel disease.   In the 29 patients with two-vessel disease, Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin identified perfusion defects in two vascular territories in 14 and seven patients, respectively (p = 0.02, Fig. 3). Patients with three-vessel disease were excluded from the study.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Detection of perfusion defects in two vascular territories in the 29 patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease (p = 0.02 by McNemar’s test).

 
Detection of CAD.   The sensitivity of the two agents for the detection of mild-to-moderate CAD was not significantly different from each other (63% [51/81] for Tc-99m sestamibi and 58% [47/81] for Tc-99m tetrofosmin, p = 0.09). In the seven patients with <5% probability of CAD or with normal coronary arteries, the specificity of both agents was 57.1%.

Image quality.   There was overall agreement of 67% (59/88) for classification of images based on quality into excellent, good, fair and poor categories, p = NS (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Image Quality

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of this study indicate that in patients with mild- to-moderate CAD, dipyridamole SPECT imaging with Tc-99m sestamibi demonstrates greater perfusion defect extent, severity and reversibility than does Tc-99m tetrofosmin, and more accurately predicts disease in more than one vessel. The low sensitivity of both agents demonstrated in this study in comparison to previously published results (18–21) was expected as a result of the deliberate selection of patients with only mild-to-moderate coronary disease without previous myocardial infarction. The lack of a significant difference in the diagnostic sensitivity of the two agents despite a trend in favor of Tc-99m sestamibi is most likely a reflection of inadequate sample size. On the basis of current results it is estimated that 135 and 541 patients would be required to demonstrate a 10% and 5% difference in diagnostic sensitivity, respectively (at 5% level of significance and 80% power).

Mechanism.   The parallel relationship between myocardial blood flow and the myocardial uptake of extractable flow tracers is limited by the roll-off phenomenon, a plateau of tracer uptake when myocardial blood flow is progressively increased (4,9,22). The precise flow rate at which this phenomenon occurs is determined by the first-pass myocardial extraction of the tracer (4,9). Hence, the myocardial uptake of Tc-99m teboroxime (Emax 0.63 to 0.81) (23), thallium-201 (Emax 0.59 to 0.73) (24), and Tc-99 sestamibi (Emax 0.31 to 0.73) (25) plateau at progressively lower blood flow rates of 5 ml/g/min, 3 ml/g/min and 2 ml/g/min, respectively (4,26). Tc-99m tetrofosmin has a lower extraction fraction (Emax 0.15 to 0.33) and may plateau when myocardial blood flow increases approximately 1.5-fold (5). The plateau effect limits the sensitivity of a tracer to detect CAD and reversible perfusion defects by reducing defect contrast (4,9). It may affect imaging with vasodilator stress more than dynamic exercise (5,9), and the detection of mild rather than severe coronary disease (8).

Accordingly, previous animal and clinical studies have demonstrated greater underestimation of coronary flow heterogeneity (27) and stress perfusion defect size and extent by both Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin compared with thallium-201 (28–32). Two of these studies (29,30) reported a similar defect extent on the rest Tc-99m sestamibi and redistribution thallium-201 images, suggesting that the smaller defect size on stress Tc-99m sestamibi imaging may have been due to its lower myocardial extraction during exercise induced vasodilation.

Previous studies.   Two small intraindividual comparative studies of Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin showed diagnostic equivalence. However, Flamen et al. (6) did not report on coronary anatomy, whereas Acampa and colleagues (7) used dynamic exercise stress and patients with severe disease (of 25 patients, 15 and 14 had previous myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, respectively). Therefore, differences occurring as a result of low tracer extraction may not have manifested.

Implications for risk stratification.   Although there is now a large volume of data involving several thousand patients establishing the prognostic utility of Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging (14, 33–36), in the light of the current results this should not be empirically extrapolated to Tc-99m tetrofosmin imaging when vasodilator stress is used.

Limitations of the study.   We were limited by the lack of a quantification program validated for both agents. Although the CEqual software to quantify perfusion defects has been validated for Tc-99m sestamibi but not for Tc-99m tetrofosmin, at least two previous studies have suggested that the choice of the quantitative program is unlikely to influence the imaging results to any significant degree (37,38).

Conclusion.   Dipyridamole SPECT imaging with Tc-99m sestamibi demonstrates greater myocardial perfusion defect reversibility, extent and severity than Tc-99m tetrofosmin in patients with mild-to-moderate CAD, and is more likely to correctly identify patients with disease in more than one coronary artery. These findings may have significant diagnostic and prognostic implications.


    Acknowledgments
 
We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Usha Raval, HND; Uday Bhonsle, MSc; Carole Benjamin, CNMT; and Andre Gagnon, CNMT.


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported by a grant from the DuPont Pharmaceutical Company and the Michael Tabor Cardiac Research Fund.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Beller GA, Sinusas AJ. Experimental studies of the physiologic properties of technetium-99m isonitriles. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:5E–8E[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Leppo JA, Meerdink DJ. Comparison of the myocardial uptake of a technetium-labelled isonitrile analogue and thallium. Circ Res. 1989;65:632–639[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Meerdink DJ, Leppo JA. Experimental studies of the physiologic properties of technetium-99m agents: myocardial transport of perfusion imaging agents. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:9E–15E[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Heller GV. Tracer selection with different stress modalities based on tracer kinetics. J Nucl Cardiol. 1996;6:S15–S21[CrossRef]
  5. Glover DK, Ruiz M, Yang JY, Smith WH, Watson DD, Beller GA. Myocardial Tc-99m tetrofosmin uptake during adenosine-induced vasodilation with either a critical or mild coronary stenosis. Comparison with Tl-201 and regional myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1997;96:2332–2338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Flamen P, Bossuyt A, Franken PR. Technetium-99m-tetrofosmin in dipyridamole-stress myocardial SPECT imaging: intraindividual comparison with technetium-99m-sestamibi. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:2009–2015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Acampa W, Cuocolo A, Sullo P, et al. Direct comparison of technetium 99m-sestamibi and technetium 99m-tetrofosmin cardiac single photon emission computed tomography in patients with coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998;5:265–274[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Shanoudy H, Raggi P, Beller GA, et al. Comparison of technetium-99m tetrofosmin and thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging for detection of myocardial perfusion defects in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:331–337[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Watson DD, Glover DK. Overview of kinetics and modeling. In: Zaret BL, Beller GA, eds. Nuclear Cardiology: State of the Art and Future Directions. Mosby, 1999:3–12.
  10. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:1350–1358[Abstract]
  11. Botvinick EH, Dae MW. Dipyridamole perfusion scintigraphy. Sem Nucl Med. 1991;21:242–265[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Taillefer R. Technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial imaging: same-day rest-stress studies and dipyridamole. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:80E–84E[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Soman P, Khattar R, Senior R, Lahiri A. Inotropic stress with arbutamine is superior to vasodilator stress with dipyridamole for the detection of reversible ischaemia with Tc-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 1997;4:364–371[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Soman P, Parsons A, Lahiri N, Lahiri A. Prognostic value of a normal Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT scan in suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999;:252–256
  15. Kang X, Berman DS, Van Train KF, et al. Clinical validation of automatic quantitative defect size in rest technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1441–1446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Stuart A. A test for homogeneity of the marginal distribution in a two way classification. Biometrika. 1995;32:412–416
  17. Bowker AH. A test for symmetry in contingency tables. J Am Stat Assoc. 1948;43:572–574[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Kahn JK, McGhie I, Akers MS, et al. Quantitative rotational tomography with thallium-201 and Tc-99m 2-methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile. A direct comparison in normal individuals and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1989;79:1282–1293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Maddahi J, Kiat H, Van Train KF, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT in the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:55E–62E[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Taillefer R, Lambert R, Dupras G, et al. Clinical comparison between thallium-201 and Tc-99m-methoxy isobutyl isonitrile (hexamibi) myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med. 1989;15:280–286[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Zaret BL, Rigo P, Wackers FJ, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with 99mTc tetrofosmin. Comparison to 201Tl imaging and coronary angiography in a phase III multicenter trial. Tetrofosmin International Trial Study Group. Circulation. 1995;91:313–319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Beller GA. Radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear cardiology. Beller GA. Clinical Nuclear Cardiology. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company; 1995. p. 37–81
  23. Gray WA, Gewirtz H. Comparison of 99mTc-teboroxime with thallium for myocardial imaging in the presence of a coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 1991;84:1796–1807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Nielsen AP, Morris KG, Murdock R, Bruno FP, Cobb FR. Linear relationship between the distribution of thallium-201 and blood flow in ischemic and nonischemic myocardium during exercise. Circulation. 1980;61:797–801[Free Full Text]
  25. Okada R, Glover D, Gaffney T, Williams S. Myocardial kinetics of Tc-99m hexakis-2-methoxy-2-methylpropylisonitrile. Circulation. 1988;77:491–498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Dahlberg ST, Leppo JA. Tracer kinetics in the isolated heart model. In: Zaret BL, Beller GA, eds. Nuclear Cardiology: State of the Art and Future Directions. Mosby, 1999:27–36.
  27. Glover DK, Ruiz M, Edwards NC, et al. Comparison between Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi uptake during adenosine-induced vasodilation as a function of coronary stenosis severity. Circulation. 1995;91:813–820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Tamaki N, Takahashi N, Kawamoto M, et al. Myocardial tomography using technetium-99m-tetrofosmin to evaluate coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:594–600[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Narahara KA, Villanueva-Myer J, Thompson CJ, Brizendine M, Mena L. Comparison of thallium-201 and technetium-99m hexakis 2-methoxy isobutyl isonitrile single photon emission computerised tomography for estimating the extent of myocardial ischaemia and infarction in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:1438–1444[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Maublant JC, Marcaggi X, Lusson JR, et al. Comparison between thallium-201 and technetium-99m methoxyisobutyl isonitrile defect size in single-photon emission computed tomography at rest, exercise and redistribution in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:183–187[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Matsunari I, Fujino S, Taki J, et al. Comparison of defect size between thallium-201 and technetium-99m tetrofosmin myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:350–354[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Nakajima K, Taki J, Shuke N, Bunko H, Takata S, Hisada K. Myocardial perfusion imaging and dynamic analysis with technetium-99m tetrofosmin. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1478–1484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Brown KA, Altland E, Rowen M. Prognostic value of normal technetium-99m-sestamibi cardiac imaging. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:554–557[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Boyne TS, Koplan BA, Parsons WJ, Smith WH, Watson DD, Beller GA. Predicting adverse outcome with exercise SPECT technetium-99m sestamibi imaging in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:270–274[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Stratmann HG, Tamesis BR, Younis LT, Wittry MD, Miller DD. Prognostic value of dipyridamole technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial tomography in patients with stable chest pain who are unable to exercise. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:647–652[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Kiat H, et al. Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilisation of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:639–647[Abstract]
  37. Widding A, Hesse B, Gadsboll N. Technetium-99m sestamibi and tetrofosmin myocardial single-photon emission tomography: can we use the same reference data base? Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:42–45[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Wackers FJ. Are separate normal data files required for quantitative pharmacologic stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging? J Nucl Card. 1996;3:S31–S40[CrossRef]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
I. Madar, H. Ravert, A. DiPaula, Y. Du, R. F. Dannals, and L. Becker
Assessment of Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis in a Canine Model Using the PET Agent 18F-Fluorobenzyl Triphenyl Phosphonium: Comparison with 99mTc-Tetrofosmin
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 1021 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. J. DeLuca, E. Cusack, W. S. Aronow, and C. E. Monsen
Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value of the Dipyridamole Sestamibi Stress Test Comparing Arterial to Vein Conduits
Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1040 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C Y Loong and C Anagnostopoulos
Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging
Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(suppl_5): v2 - v9.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Borges-Neto, R. H. Tuttle, L. K. Shaw, W. T. Smith IV, D. Jain, R. E. Coleman, and D. Whellan
Outcome Prediction in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison between 99mTc Tetrofosmin and 99mTc Sestamibi
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 58 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Fleischmann, P. Koepfli, M. Namdar, C. A. Wyss, R. Jenni, and P. A. Kaufmann
Gated 99mTc-Tetrofosmin SPECT for Discriminating Infarct from Artifact in Fixed Myocardial Perfusion Defects
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2004; 45(5): 754 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
N K Sabharwal and A Lahiri
Role of myocardial perfusion imaging for risk stratification in suspected or known coronary artery disease
Heart, November 1, 2003; 89(11): 1291 - 1297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
L. J. Shaw, R. Hendel, S. Borges-Neto, M. S. Lauer, N. Alazraki, J. Burnette, E. Krawczynska, M. Cerqueira, and J. Maddahi
Prognostic Value of Normal Exercise and Adenosine 99mTc-Tetrofosmin SPECT Imaging: Results from the Multicenter Registry of 4,728 Patients
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2003; 44(2): 134 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Elhendy, J. J. Bax, and D. Poldermans
Dobutamine Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2002; 43(12): 1634 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. F.L. Schinkel, A. Elhendy, R. T. van Domburg, J. J. Bax, J. R.T.C. Roelandt, and D. Poldermans
Prognostic Value of Dobutamine-Atropine Stress 99mTc-Tetrofosmin Myocardial Perfusion SPECT in Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2002; 43(6): 767 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lahiri, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lahiri, A.

 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home