|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:2044-2046 © 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
a Haemostasis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Unit, University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Gregory Lip, Haemostasis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Unit, University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, England, UK
G.Y.H.LIP{at}bham.ac.uk
Improvements in laboratory techniques have allowed us to quantify various components of Virchow’s triad, which, if abnormally elevated, confer the presence of a so-called "prothrombotic" or "hypercoagulable" state. Such abnormalities in certain indexes of hypercoagulability (such as fibrinogen) have been found in cardiovascular diseases as diverse as coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation and heart failure (2–5). This prothrombotic state has been related to target organ damage and cardiovascular risk as well as prognosis, and it can be modified by interventions such as antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy (6–10). More recently, the importance of the fibrinolytic pathway is becoming apparent as high levels of the principal inhibitor of this process (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, PAI-1) also predict the development of ischemic events (11–13). It follows that one may postulate that the high-risk patients with evidence of ongoing thrombogenesis and abnormal fibrinolysis, which are important facets of the prothrombotic state, are more likely to exhibit greater hypercoagulability.
From the cardiologist’s perspective, one particularly high-risk population of patients is represented by the acute coronary syndromes. It is therefore of little surprise that the abnormalities in the prothrombotic or the hypercoagulable state in CAD have been related to the acute coronary syndromes or myocardial infarction (MI), and so rightly continue to provide fertile research opportunities. For example, in this issue of the Journal, Figueras et al. (14) extend this relationship further by reporting abnormalities in thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimer, fibrinogen and PAI-1 antigen in 40 patients with acute MI and 23 patients with unstable angina. The markers were measured upon hospital admission, at 10 days, and importantly, at three months’ follow-up. They find that patients who developed recurrent angina while in the hospital had higher PAI levels than those who were free of angina, indicating higher inhibition of fibrinolysis and greater thrombin generation. This therefore supports the developing concept that adequate fibrinolysis is a valuable component in the rapid return to health (11–13).
However, further interesting questions arise from this article. The time of pain onset to first blood sampling ranged between 1 h 15 min and 18 h 10 min in patients with unstable angina, and 1 h 22 min to 17 h 30 min in those with acute MI. If we postulate that thrombogenesis is an active ongoing dynamic process, patients sampled 1 to 2 h after pain onset are likely to have a different coagulation and/or fibrinolytic activation profile when compared with those sampled at 17 to 18 h after pain onset, given the short half-lives of many of these molecules. Furthermore, patients who may be symptomatically stabilized may yet continue to have underlying "silent" angina. If thrombogenesis is related to underlying acute ischaemia, then such patients would certainly manifest an abnormal prothrombotic state that would need to be studied further.
Myocardial infarction is often associated with mural thrombus and/or associated heart failure or atrial fibrillation (4,5), which can all alter markers of thrombogenesis and can perhaps be further confounding factors. Indeed, the greater myocardial damage in MI compared with unstable angina may release several cytokine mediators, such as interleukin-6, resulting in a more marked acute phase response with different effects on thrombogenesis and fibrinolysis—perhaps explaining some of the observations in this article (14). Many drugs, such as the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and heparin, as well as contrast media from the subset undergoing cardiac catherization or angioplasty, can also influence the measured parameters.
As apparent in the article by Figueras et al. (14), the use of thrombolytic therapy during the treatment of acute MI results in further generation of fibrin degradation products, including fibrin D-dimer (which they measure). Previous reports have suggested that the maximum rise in fibrin D-dimer is seen between 1 and 4 h, but importantly, elevations in fibrin D-dimer levels do not appear to be predictive of coronary patency (15,16). However, it is important to note that only a fraction of the elevation in fibrin D-dimer is actually due to lysis of coronary thrombi, and most derive from other types of intravascular fibrin (17) for example, the lysis of cross-linked circulating fibrin polymers. Measurement of peripheral fibrin D-dimer levels after thrombolytic therapy for acute MI therefore does not distinguish between these two potential sources of D-dimer, and as the article from Figueras et al. (14) suggests, there is little role for the routine measurement of fibrin D-dimer after thrombolytic therapy for acute MI. The increase in fibrin D-dimer levels also appears to be independent of the type of thrombolytic agent used and of the clinical course following the infarct (18).
The observations linking the prothrombotic state and cardiovascular disease are nevertheless important in view of the relationship between these markers and both short- and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. For example, hypertensive subjects with plasma fibrinogen levels >3.5 g/liter had a 12-fold higher cardiovascular risk than those with plasma fibrinogen levels <2.9 g/liter in the Leigh general practice study (19). In a study of 617 patients with claudication, the Edinburgh Artery Study reported that baseline fibrin D-dimer levels were closely related to future coronary events (both fatal and nonfatal, with a relative risk of 4.4 between upper and lower quintiles) and also with hemodynamic progression of peripheral arterial disease (6). Indeed, higher plasma levels of fibrin degradation products have been found in patients suffering thrombotic reocclusion following femoropopliteal artery angioplasty, when compared with patients with maintained patency of the dilated arterial segment (20). Indeed, indexes of a prothrombotic or hypercoagulable state, even within the "normal" laboratory range, can predict both arterial thrombotic events and postoperative thrombosis (6,10,21), suggesting that there may be a continuum between health, a "statistical" increase in (say) fibrin turnover as a prethrombotic state, and "overtly" increased fibrin turnover in acute thrombosis (or sometimes in acute extravascular fibrin formation, as follows injury or surgery) (10). Importantly, increased thrombogenesis appears to contribute to the progression of both coronary and peripheral atherosclerosis, which is consistent with the hypothesis that markers such as fibrin D-dimer may be a useful index of intravascular fibrin turnover and the contribution of thrombosis to arterial disease (6,10–13).
Figueras et al. (14) also report that levels of the various indexes measured were "significantly higher" than "controls," which comprised 25 healthy individuals with a mean age of 47 years, compared with a mean age of 57.8 years in the patient group. As the authors rightly point out, some caution is needed in interpreting this statement in view of the association between some of the measured indexes and age. Furthermore, their use of symptomatic assessments (i.e., angina vs. no angina) have some limitations, and evaluations using measures of high risk such as troponins would perhaps have been more valuable (22), especially if they could be correlated with the indexes of thrombogenesis. Another question that may be raised is whether subgroup analyses (e.g., 12 patients with unstable angina who are compared with the 11 who did not develop angina [14]) are adequately powered. Some parameters such as D-dimer and thrombin-antithrombin are highly skewed so that median (rather than mean) values would be more representative of what is actually going on.
Would thrombogenesis or fibrinolysis represent a cause, or an effect, in acute coronary syndromes or MI? Since the processes of thrombogenesis and atherogenesis have many similarities to inflammatory disease, the elevations in various indexes may simply reflect the severity of the underlying vascular disorders as a secondary phenomenon rather than act as a true prognostic factor. Indeed, it has been suggested that the associations between cardiovascular disease and the prothrombotic state may be explained by a reactive or secondary rise in plasma hemostatic factors, either as an acute phase response or as a vascular disease-related "hematological stress syndrome" (23). There is increasing recognition of the parallel changes in the inflammatory response in the pathogenesis of CAD, including the prediction of subsequent cardiac events in patients with both unstable and chronic coronary disease (24,25). Furthermore, in view of possible relationships between Chlamydia pneumoniae and Helicobacter pylori (26) with CAD, including acute coronary syndromes, the role of potential pathogenic infections needs to be defined. For example, some studies have suggested that interventions with antibiotics to eradicate C pneumoniae in patients with acute coronary syndromes may be beneficial, although some of the antibiotics used have anti-inflammatory effects (27,28). There is also the possibility that thrombolytic therapy for acute MI may be related to an increase in oxidative stress, platelet activation and endothelial cell damage (29). Despite the diverse nature of (possible) stimuli, the final common pathway linking abnormal thrombogenesis and cardiovascular disease may well be cytokine mediated (30), which opens the possibility of a target for intervention.
The identification of ongoing thrombogenesis and fibrinolysis in patients with MI or acute coronary syndromes represents facets of a prothrombotic or hypercoagulable state and may possibly identify a high-risk subset of patients who may develop complications. Large prospective studies are required to carefully document the precise interactions between the many components of Virchow’s triad and clinical outcomes in cardiovascular disease.
 |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
 Top References |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Jerjes-Sanchez Venous and arterial thrombosis: a continuous spectrum of the same disease? Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2005; 26(1): 3 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E.-G. V. Giardina, H. J. Chen, R. R. Sciacca, and L. E. Rabbani Dynamic Variability of Hemostatic and Fibrinolytic Factors in Young Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 6179 - 6184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. H. Reisin, N. Pancheva, M. Berman, V. Khalameizer, J. Jafary, C. Yosefy, Y. Blaer, I. Manevich, R. Peled, and S. Scharf Circadian Variation of the Efficacy of Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction--Isn't the Time Ripe for Cardiovascular Chronotherapy? Angiology, May 1, 2004; 55(3): 257 - 263. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. W. Lee and G. Y. H. Lip Effects of Lifestyle on Hemostasis, Fibrinolysis, and Platelet Reactivity: A Systematic Review Arch Intern Med, October 27, 2003; 163(19): 2368 - 2392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. Derhaschnig, A. N. Laggner, M. Roggla, M. M. Hirschl, S. Kapiotis, C. Marsik, and B. Jilma Evaluation of Coagulation Markers for Early Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Emergency Room Clin. Chem., November 1, 2002; 48(11): 1924 - 1930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
