JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35:778-786
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, W.
Right arrow Articles by Antzelevitch, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, W.
Right arrow Articles by Antzelevitch, C.

EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES

Differential effects of beta-adrenergic agonists and antagonists in LQT1, LQT2 and LQT3 models of the long QT syndrome

Wataru Shimizu, MD, PhDa and Charles Antzelevitch, PhD, FACCa

a Masonic Medical Research Laboratory, Utica, New York, USA

Manuscript received July 30, 1999; revised manuscript received September 21, 1999, accepted November 3, 1999.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Charles Antzelevitch, Masonic Medical Research Laboratory, 2150 Bleecker Street, Utica, New York 13501-1787
ca{at}mmrl.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES

To define the cellular mechanisms responsible for the development of life-threatening arrhythmias in response to sympathetic activity in the congenital and acquired long QT syndromes (LQTS).

METHODS

Transmembrane action potentials (AP) from epicardial (EPI), M and endocardial (ENDO) cells and a transmural electrocardiogram were simultaneously recorded from an arterially perfused wedge of canine left ventricle. We examined the effect of beta-adrenergic agonists and antagonists on action potential duration (APD90), transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) and the development of Torsade de Pointes (TdP) in models of LQT1, LQT2 and LQT3 forms of LQTS.

RESULTS

IKs block with chromanol 293B (LQT1) homogeneously prolonged APD90 of the three cell types without increasing TDR. Addition of isoproterenol prolonged QT and APD90 of M but abbreviated that of EPI and ENDO, causing a persistent increase in TDR; Torsade de Pointes developed or could be induced only in the presence of isoproterenol. IKr block with d-sotalol (LQT2) and augmentation of late INa with ATX-II (LQT3) prolonged APD90 of M more than EPI and ENDO, causing increases in QT and TDR. TdP developed in the absence of isoproterenol. In LQT2 isoproterenol initially prolonged, then abbreviated, the APD90 of M but always abbreviated EPI, thus transiently increasing TDR and the incidence of TdP. In LQT3, isoproterenol always abbreviated APD90 of the three cell types, causing a persistent decrease in TDR and suppression of TdP. The arrhythmogenic as well as protective actions of isoproterenol were reversed by propranolol.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that beta-adrenergic stimulation induces TdP by increasing transmural dispersion of repolarization in LQT1 and LQT2 but suppresses TdP by decreasing dispersion in LQT3. The data indicate that beta-blockers are protective in LQT1 and LQT2 but may facilitate TdP in LQT3.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  APD = action potential duration
  APD90 = action potential duration measured at 90% repolarization
  APD100 = APD measured at full repolarization
  BCL = basic cycle length
  EAD = early afterdepolarization
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  Icl(ca) = calcium activated chloride current
  Ikr = rapidly activating delayer rectifier current
  Iks = slowly activating delayed rectifier current
  INa-Ca = Na+/Ca2+ exchange current
  late INa = late sodium current
  LQTS = long QT syndrome
  PES = programmed electrical stimulation
  S1 = basic stimuli
  S2 = premature stimuli
  TdP = Torsade de Pointes
  TDR = transmural dispersion of repolarization


The congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) is an hereditary disorder characterized by a prolonged QT interval in the electrocardiogram (ECG), commonly associated with an atypical polymorphic ventricular tachycardia known as Torsade de Pointes (TdP) (1–7). Genetic studies have identified five gene mutations on chromosomes 3, 7, 11 and 21 as responsible for the congenital long QT syndrome (8,9). Mutations in KvLQT1 and minK (KCNE1) are responsible for defects in the slowly activating delayed rectifier potassium current (IKs), which underlies the LQT1 and LQT5 forms of LQTS, whereas mutations in HERG and KCNE2 are responsible for defect in the rapidly activating component of the delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr), which underlies the LQT2 and LQT6 (10). A mutation in SCN5A causes an increase in late sodium current (late INa) which is responsible for LQT3. Congenital forms of LQTS have been shown to be exquisitely sensitive to increased sympathetic nervous system activity or to exogenously administered catecholamines. Indeed, an imbalance of sympathetic inputs to the heart was at one time thought to underlie the syndrome (1–4). Accordingly, beta-adrenergic blockade has long been accepted as front line therapy for LQTS.

Preliminary clinical reports suggest differences in the sensitivity of LQT1, LQT2 and LQT3 to beta-adrenergic stimuli (11). Experimental studies employing isolated guinea pig myocytes also suggest differences in the effect of isoproterenol on action potential duration (APD) in pharmacologic models that mimic LQT2 (dofetilide) and LQT3 (anthopleurin A) (12).

Recent studies from our laboratory examined the electrophysiologic, electrocardiographic and pharmacologic characteristics of the LQT1, LQT2 and LQT3 syndromes using arterially-perfused canine left ventricular wedge preparations, in which we are able to simultaneously record transmembrane activity from epicardial, M and endocardial or Purkinje sites together with a pseudo-ECG along the same axis, permitting correlation of transmembrane and ECG activity (13–18). The wedge preparation is capable of developing and sustaining a variety of arrhythmias, including TdP. The pharmacologic models mimicked the clinical congenital syndromes with respect to prolongation of the QT interval, T wave morphology, rate dependence of repolarization and response to antiarrhythmic drugs (14–18). Using this model, we recently demonstrated the determining role of beta-adrenergic stimuli in the development of transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) and TdP in a model of LQT1 (15). This study uses the wedge preparation to define the role of beta-adrenergic stimuli and elucidate their cellular mechanisms under conditions mimicking the LQT1, LQT2 and LQT3 forms of the congenital LQTS.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Arterially perfused wedge of canine left ventricle.   Dogs weighing 20–25 kg were anticoagulated with heparin and anesthetized with pentobarbital (30–35 mg/kg, IV). The chest was opened via a left thoracotomy, the heart excised, placed in a cardioplegic solution consisting of cold (4°C) or room temperature Tyrode’s solution containing 8.5 mmol/L [K+]o. Transmural wedges with dimensions of approximately 2 x 1.5 x 0.9 cm to 3 x 2 x 1.5 cm were dissected from the left ventricle. The tissue was cannulated via a small (diameter ~100 µm) native branch of left descending coronary artery and perfused with cardioplegic solution. Unperfused tissue, readily identified by its maintained red appearance (erythrocytes not washed away) was carefully removed using a razor blade. The preparation was then placed in a small tissue bath and arterially perfused with Tyrode’s solution of the following composition (mmol/L): 129 NaCl, 4 KCl, 0.9 NaH2PO4, 20 NaHCO3, 1.8 CaCl2, 0.5 MgSO4, 5.5 glucose, buffered with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 (37 ± 1°C). The perfusate was delivered to the artery by a roller pump (Cole Parmer Instrument Co., Niles, Illinois). Perfusion pressure was monitored with a pressure transducer (World Precision Instruments, Inc., Sarasota, Florida) and maintained between 40 and 50 mm Hg by adjustment of the perfusion flow rate. The preparations remained immersed in the arterial perfusate, which was allowed to rise to a level 2 to 3 mm above the tissue surface when possible. To facilitate impalement with the floating microelectrodes, in some experiments the bath solution was brought to a level just shy of the top of the wedge and the chamber was covered to the extent possible so as to avoid a temperature gradient between the top and lower segments of the wedge. Preparations displaying significant ST segment elevation or depression, or in which temperature gradients were evident along the length of the preparation, were excluded from the study.

Recordings of a transmural ECG and transmembrane action potentials.   The ventricular wedges were allowed to equilibrate in the tissue bath until electrically stable, usually 1 h, and stimulated using bipolar silver electrodes insulated except at the tips and applied to the endocardial surface (S1).

A transmural ECG was recorded using 3 M KCL-Agar electrodes (1.1 mm, internal diameter). The electrodes were placed in the Tyrode’s solution bathing the preparation, 1.0 to 1.5 cm from the epicardial and endocardial surfaces of the preparation, along the same vector as the transmembrane recordings (Epicardium: "positive" pole). The electrical field of the preparation as a whole was measured using this technique. Thus, the electrocardiographic registration represents a pseudo-ECG of that part of the left ventricle. To differentiate it from local electrogram activity, we refer to it as an ECG in the remainder of the text.

Transmembrane action potentials were simultaneously recorded from the epicardial, M and endocardial sites using three to four separate intracellular floating microelectrodes (direct current resistance: 10 to 20 M_; 2.7 mol/L KCl). Epicardial and endocardial action potentials were recorded from the epicardial and the endocardial surfaces of the preparations at positions approximating the transmural axis of the ECG recording. M cell action potentials were recorded at the site along the same axis at which APD was longest.

All amplified signals were digitized, stored on magnetic media and CD and analyzed using Spike 2 (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, United Kingdom).

Study protocols.   The IKs blocker, chromanol 293B (30 µmol/L), was used to create a model of LQT1 (15), the IKr blocker, d-sotalol (100 µmol/L), was used to mimic the LQT2 syndrome (14) and ATX-II (20 nmol/L), an agent that augments late INa, was used to generate a model of LQT3 (14,18). The validity of these pharmacologic models as surrogates for the congenital syndromes was previously demonstrated in myocyte (12), perfused wedge (14–18) and in vivo studies (19,20).

We routinely examined:

  1. the influence of isoproterenol (50–100 nmol/L), a beta-adrenergic agonist, on the QT interval, the APD and TDR (LQT1: n = 10, LQT2: n = 8, LQT3: n = 8),
  2. the dose-dependent effects of propranolol (0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0 µmol/L) in the absence of isoproterenol (LQT1: n = 8, LQT2: n = 6, LQT3: n = 6), and
  3. the effects of propranolol (0.5–1.0 µmol/L) to suppress the influence of isoproterenol (LQT1: n = 10, LQT2: n = 8, LQT3: n = 8).

Control measurements were obtained after approximately 1 h of equilibration. The chromanol 293B, d-sotalol and ATX-II data were collected for a period of up to 1 h starting 1 h after addition of the respective drug. The effect of isoproterenol was recorded at 2 and 10 min, approximating the maximal and steady state influence of the catecholamine, respectively. A steady-state was achieved within 5–7 min. Propranolol data were recorded after 20 min of exposure to each concentration of drug.

Action potential duration was measured at 90% repolarization (APD90). Transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) was defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest repolarization time (activation time + APD90) of transmembrane action potentials recorded across the wall (M cell – epicardial cell). The QT interval was defined as the time between QRS onset and the point at which the final downslope of the T wave crossed the baseline. In all figures, graphic correlation of transmembrane and electrocardiographic activity was achieved by dropping a dotted line from the point of full repolarization of each action potential (APD100-approximated by eye) to the ECG trace.

The development of spontaneous as well as programmed electrical stimulation (PES)-induced TdP was assessed in the absence of any drugs (control), in the presence of chromanol 293B, d-sotalol or ATX-II alone and after further addition of isoproterenol (2 min and 10 min), propranolol or a combination of the two agents. Programmed electrical stimulation-induced arrhythmias were evaluated using single extrastimuli (S2) applied to the epicardial surface of the wedge.

Statistics.   Statistical analysis of the data was performed using a Student t test for paired data or Analysis of Variance coupled with Scheffe’s test, as appropriate. Data are expressed as mean ± SD values, except for those shown in the figures, which are expressed as mean ± SEM values. Significance was defined as a p < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effect of chromanol 293B, d-sotalol and ATX-II on QT interval, APD and dispersion of repolarization.   Table 1 shows effects of chromanol 293B (LQT1 model), d-sotalol (LQT2 model) and ATX-II (LQT3 model) alone on the QT interval, the APD90 of the endocardial, M and epicardial cells and TDR at a BCL of 2,000 msec. The APD90 of the endocardial cell was always between that of the M cell and epicardial cell. Chromanol 293B (30 µmol/L) produced a homogeneous prolongation of APD90 of the three cell types, thus prolonging the QT interval with no major change in the width of the T wave or TDR (Fig. 1, 4A and 4B). d-Sotalol (100 µmol/L) produced a preferential prolongation of APD90 of the M cell, thus causing an increase in the QT interval and TDR (Fig. 2, 4C and 4D). ATX-II (20 nmol/L) also preferentially prolonged the APD90 of the M cell, although the APD90 of all transmural sites prolonged more than with d-sotalol, resulting in a delay in the appearance of the T wave and a dramatic increase in the QT interval and TDR (Fig. 3, 4E and 4F).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Effects of Chromanol 293B, d-Sotalol and ATX-II on the QT Interval, APD90 and Transmural Dispersion of Repolarization in Perfused Wedge Preparations

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Effect of isoproterenol in the LQT1 model. Shown are superimposed action potentials recorded simultaneously from M and epicardial cells, together with a transmural ECG. BCL = 2,000 ms. Chromanol 293B (30 µmol/L) produced a homogeneous prolongation of APD of both cell types with no major change in the width of the T wave or in TDR. Isoproterenol (Iso, 100 nmol/L) in the continued presence of 293B dramatically prolonged the APD of the M cell (2 min) and maintained it prolonged as the effect approached a steady state (10 min), whereas the epicardial action potential was always abbreviated, resulting in a persistent increase in TDR and in a widening of the T wave, as commonly seen in LQT1 patients. APD = action potential duration; LQT1 = long QT syndrome 1; TDR = transmural dispersion of repolarization.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Effect of isoproterenol in the LQT2 model. d-Sotalol (d-Sot, 100 µmol/L) produced a preferential prolongation of the M cell APD and an increase in TDR. Isoproterenol (Iso, 100 nmol/L) in the continued presence of d-Sot initially prolonged (2 min) and then abbreviated the APD of the M cell to the control level (10 min), whereas the APD of epicardial cell was always abbreviated, resulting in a transient increase in TDR. APD = action potential duration; LQT2 = long QT syndrome 2; TDR = transmural dispersion of repolarization.

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Effect of isoproterenol in the LQT3 model. ATX-II (20 nmol/L) produced a marked prolongation of APD of the M cell, more than that of the epicardial cell and a dramatic increase in TDR. Isoproterenol (Iso, 100 nmol/L) in the continued presence of ATX-II always abbreviated the APD of both cells, resulting in a persistent decrease in TDR. APD = action potential duration; LQT3 = long QT syndrome 3; TDR = transmural dispersion of repolarization.

 


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Composite data of the effect of isoproterenol in the LQT1, LQT2 and LQT3 models. In LQT1, isoproterenol (Iso) produced a persistent prolongation of the APD90 of the M cell and of the QT interval (at both 2 and 10 min), whereas the APD90 of the epicardial cell was always abbreviated, resulting in a persistent increase in TDR (A and B). In LQT2, isoproterenol initially prolonged (2 min) and then abbreviated the QT interval and the APD90 of the M cell to the control level (10 min), whereas the APD90 of epicardial cell was always abbreviated, resulting in a transient increase in TDR (C and D). In LQT3, isoproterenol produced a persistent abbreviation of the QT interval and the APD90 of both M and epicardial cells (at both 2 and 10 min), resulting in a persistent decrease in TDR (E and F). *p < 0.0005 vs. control; {dagger}p < 0.0005; {dagger}{dagger}p < 0.005; {dagger}{dagger}{dagger}p < 0.05, vs. 293B, d-Sotalol (d-Sot) or ATX-II. APD90 = action potential duration measured at 90% repolarization; LQT1, 2, 3 = long QT syndrome 1, 2, 3; TDR = transmural dispersion of repolarization.

 
Differential effect of isoproterenol in the LQT1, LQT2 and LQT3 models.   The influence of isoproterenol in the LQT1 model is illustrated in Figure 1. Shown are superimposed action potentials recorded simultaneously from M and epicardial cells, together with a transmural ECG at a BCL of 2,000 msec. In all cases, the peak of the T wave in the ECG was coincident with the repolarization of epicardium, whereas the end of the T wave was coincident with the repolarization of the M region. Thus, TDR across the ventricular wall was defined as the difference in the repolarization time between the M cell and epicardial cell. In the presence of 30 µmol/L chromanol 293B, which alone produced a homogeneous prolongation of APD with no major change in the width of the T wave or in TDR, isoproterenol (100 nmol/L) dramatically prolonged the QT interval and the APD of the M cell, but abbreviated that of the epicardial cell, resulting in a persistent increase in TDR and in a widening of the T wave, as commonly seen in LQT1 patients. Composite data of the influence of isoproterenol in the LQT1 model is shown in Figure 4, A and B.

Figure 2 illustrates the influence of isoproterenol in the LQT2 model. After a preferential prolongation of the M cell action potential and an increase in TDR by 100 µmol/L d-sotalol, isoproterenol (100 nmol/L) initially prolonged (2 min) and then abbreviated the QT interval and the APD of the M cell to the control level (10 min), whereas the APD of the epicardial cell was always abbreviated, resulting in a transient increase in TDR. Composite data of the influence of isoproterenol in the LQT2 model is shown in Figure 4, C and D.

The effect of isoproterenol in the LQT3 model is illustrated in Figure 3. ATX-II 20 nmol/L alone produced a dramatic prolongation of the M cell action potential and a more modest prolongation of the APD of epicardium, resulting in a dramatic increase in TDR. Isoproterenol (100 nmol/L) produced a persistent abbreviation of the QT interval and the APD of both cells, resulting in a persistent decrease of TDR. Composite data of the influence of isoproterenol in the LQT3 model is shown in Figure 4, E and F.

In four preparations, we examined the influence of isoproterenol (100 nmol/L) alone on transmembrane and ECG activity. Isoproterenol always abbreviated the APD90 of the three cell types, thus abbreviating the QT interval without any major changes in TDR or the development of TdP.

Effect of propranolol on the QT interval, APD and dispersion of repolarization.   In all three models, therapeutic concentrations of propranolol (0.1 to 1 µmol/L) had little or no effect on the QT interval, APD90 of the three cell types or TDR. Higher concentrations (3 µmol/L) preferentially abbreviated the QT interval and APD90 of the M cell, resulting in a significant decrease of TDR, most likely due to the effect of this concentration of propranolol to block the late INa, which is intrinsically larger in the M cell than in the other cell types (21).

Effect of propranolol to suppress the influence of isoproterenol.   Figure 5 illustrates composite data of the effects of propranolol (1 µmol/L) to suppress the influence of isoproterenol in the three models. Once again, 1 µmol/L propranolol had little to no effect on the QT interval, APD90 or TDR in the three models. In LQT1 (Fig. 5, A and B) and LQT2 (Fig. 5, C and D), propranolol completely suppressed the effect of isoproterenol (at both 2 and 10 min) to persistently or transiently prolong the M cell APD90 and thus to increase TDR. In LQT3 (Fig. 5, E and F), propranolol completely suppressed the protective effect of isoproterenol (at both 2 and 10 min) to abbreviate the M cell APD90 and to decrease TDR.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Composite data of the effect of propranolol (Prop, 1 µmol/L) to suppress the influence of isoproterenol (Iso, 100 nmol/L) on the QT interval (solid circle), the APD90 of M (open circle) and epicardial (Epi, open triangle) cells and TDR (solid circle) in the LQT1 (A and B), LQT2 (C and D) and LQT3 (E and F) models. In the LQT1 and the LQT2 models, propranolol completely prevented the influence of isoproterenol to persistently or transiently increase TDR. In the LQT3 model, propranolol completely suppressed the protective effect of isoproterenol to decrease TDR. The isoproterenol data reported here were recorded 10 min after addition of the catecholamine although similar results were obtained at 2 min in the presence of propranolol. *p < 0.0005 vs. control. APD90 = action potential duration measured at 90% repolarization; LQT1, 2, 3 = long QT syndrome 1, 2, 3; TDR = transmural dispersion of repolarization.

 
Effect of isoproterenol and propranolol on development of torsade de pointes.   Spontaneous as well as stimulation-induced TdP were observed in the three models (Fig. 6). Under control conditions and in the presence of chromanol 293B alone (LQT1 model), neither spontaneous nor PES-induced TdP were observed. In this model, TdP could be induced only after addition of isoproterenol (at both 2 and 10 min). Propranolol (0.5 or 1 µmol/L) completely inhibited the effect of isoproterenol to induce spontaneous or to permit the induction of stimulation-induced TdP in the LQT1 model (Fig. 7A). In the LQT2 and LQT3 models, TdP occurred in the presence of d-sotalol and ATX-II alone (Fig. 6, A and B). In the LQT2 model, isoproterenol transiently increased the incidence of both spontaneous and stimulation-induced TdP (2 min), due in part to a transient exaggeration of TDR. At 10 min, the effect of isoproterenol reversed, approaching control values. Propranolol completely blocked isoproterenol’s action to increase the incidence of TdP (Fig. 7B). In contrast to the LQT1 and LQT2 models, isoproterenol suppressed both spontaneous and stimulation-induced TdP (at both 2 and 10 min) in the LQT3 model. In this case, propranolol reversed the protective effect of isoproterenol, causing an increase in the incidence of TdP (Fig. 7C).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia displaying features of Torsade de Pointes (TdP) in the LQT2 (A) and the LQT3 (B) models of arterially-perfused canine left ventricular wedge preparations. Each trace shows action potentials simultaneously recorded from M and epicardial (Epi) cells together with a transmural ECG. The preparation was paced from the endocardial surface at a BCL of 1,000 or 2,000 msec (S1). A: Spontaneous TdP induced in the LQT2 (d-Sotalol) model. The long episode of TdP (fourth group) was preceded by salvos of three consecutive beats (first group) and an isolated ventricular premature beat (third group), similar to the clinical experience. B: Stimulation-induced TdP in the LQT3 (ATX-II) model. ATX-II produced very significant dispersion of repolarization (first grouping). A single extrastimulus (S2) applied to the epicardial surface initiated TdP (second grouping). LQT1, 2 = long QT syndrome 1, 2.

 


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7 Incidence of spontaneous and programmed electrical stimulation (PES)-induced Torsade de Pointes (TdP) in the LQT1 (A), LQT2 (B) and LQT3 (C) models. Under control conditions (C), neither spontaneous nor PES-induced TdP were observed in any of the three models. In LQT1, TdP could be induced only after addition of isoproterenol (Iso) (at both 2 and 10 min). 0.5 or 1 µmol/L propranolol (Prop) completely suppressed the influence of isoproterenol to provoke both spontaneous and PES-induced TdP in this model. In the LQT2 and LQT3 models, TdP occurred in the presence of d-Sotalol (d-Sot) and ATX-II alone. In the LQT2 model, isoproterenol transiently increased the incidence of both spontaneous and PES-induced TdP (2 min) and then decreased it (10 min). Propranolol completely prevented these effects of isoproterenol. In contrast, isoproterenol always suppressed both spontaneous and PES-induced TdP (at both 2 and 10 min) in the LQT3 model. Propranolol reversed the protective effect of isoproterenol in LQT3, causing an increase in the incidence of TdP. LQT1, 2, 3 = long QT syndrome 1, 2, 3.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Differential response of LQT1, LQT2 and LQT3 models to beta-adrenergic stimulation.   Although it has long been appreciated that some forms of congenital and acquired LQTS are exquisitely sensitive to beta-adrenergic stimulation (1–7), the cellular basis for the arrhythmogenic actions of the sympathetic nervous system was poorly understood. Schwartz et al. (11) reported that cardiac events (sudden death and cardiac arrest) are most often associated with adrenergic factors, defined as physical and emotional stress, in patients with the LQT1 genotype than in those with either the LQT2 or LQT3. Wilde et al. (22) recently demonstrated that a sudden startle in the form of an auditory stimulus (alarm clock) is the predominant trigger of cardiac events in patients with the LQT2 syndrome. Relatively little is known about the effect of the sympathetic nervous system on TdP in LQT3, except that cardiac events usually occur at rest or during sleep (11,23).

Beta-adrenergic stimulation with isoproterenol is known to augment a number of currents, including Ca2+-activated IKs, Ca2+-activated chloride current (ICl[Ca]) (24) and Na+/Ca2+ exchange current (INa-Ca). The response of APD and of the QT interval to beta-adrenergic stimulation largely depends on the shift in net outward current. An increase in net outward repolarizing current, due to a relatively large increase of IKs and ICl(Ca) vs. INa-Ca is thought to be responsible for the abbreviation of APD and QT interval in response to beta-adrenergic stimulation under normal conditions and for abbreviation of epicardial and endocardial cell APD under long QT conditions. A defect in IKs (especially in the M region) could offset this balance and account for failure of beta-adrenergic stimulation to abbreviate APD and QT interval in patients with the LQT1 genotype (5–7,25–27). Among the three transmural cell types, the M cell has been reported to have an intrinsically smaller IKs (28).

In the LQT1 model (reduced IKs), isoproterenol prolongs the APD of the M cell because IKs (outward current) is reduced to levels at which INa-Ca (inward current) predominates. The presence of higher levels of IKs in epicardial and endocardial cells (even in the presence of chromanol 293B) accounts for the effect of the beta-agonist to abbreviate APD in these cells. The disparate effects of isoproterenol on the three cell types results in a persistent increase of TDR and in the development of spontaneous as well as stimulation-induced TdP. Our findings in the LQT1 model are concordant with a high sensitivity of patients with the LQT1 syndrome to beta-adrenergic stimulation. Cardiac events in this syndrome often occur during exercise, when catecholamine levels are maximally elevated.

In the LQT2 model (reduced IKr), isoproterenol transiently prolongs the APD of the M cell, possibly due to a more rapid increase of INa-Ca than of IKs. The constant abbreviation of epicardial and endocardial action potentials is most likely due to higher levels of IKs in these cell types. As a consequence, TDR and the incidence of TdP are only transiently increased. The persistent effect of isoproterenol to abbreviate epicardial and endocardial APD and its transient effect to prolong the APD of the M cells is also observed in strips of tissues isolated from the three regions of the wall following pretreatment with the IKr blocker, E-4031 (29). Effects similar to those of isoproterenol are observed in the M cell preparations in response to acceleration of the stimulation rate. These effects are eliminated after addition of ryanodine or in the presence of low [Ca2+]o, suggesting that the effects are secondary to intracellular Ca2+ loading. In isolated M cell, but not endocardial or epicardial, preparations pretreated with E-4031, acceleration of rate or addition of isoproterenol also transiently induce early afterdepolarization (EAD) activity (29). Our data are concordant with those of Priori et al. (12) who demonstrated an effect of isoproterenol to transiently prolong APD and induce EADs in guinea pig myocytes pretreated with the IKr blocker, dofetilide. Taken together, these findings suggest that beta-adrenergic stimulation contributes to precipitation of TdP in LQT2 by producing a transient but dramatic increase in TDR and causing induction of EAD-mediated extrasystoles. The transient nature of these changes following an increase in sympathetic activity may explain why cardiac events in LQT2 generally occur following a startle, especially from a sleep state (alarm clock, telephone bell or ambulance siren, etc.). Delays in APD adaptation during sudden arousal reaction is reported to occur not only in LQTS patients, but also in normal subjects (30). The presumption is that if TdP does not occur soon after the surge in sympathetic activity in LQT2 patients, it is unlikely to occur later (22).

In the LQT3 model (increased late INa), isoproterenol produces a persistent abbreviation of the APD of all three ventricular cell types. Preferential abbreviation of the M cell APD results in a persistent decrease of TDR and a decrease in the incidence of both spontaneous and stimulation-induced TdP. These effects of isoproterenol are likely due to an increase of IKs as well as a reduction of the electrogenic INa-Ca due to a more positive M cell action potential plateau voltage. Our data suggest that beta-adrenergic stimulation may protect against cardiac events in patients with the LQT3 genotype. These findings are consonant with the observation that patients with the LQT3 syndrome, unlike those with LQT1 or LQT2, often have cardiac events at rest or during sleep when sympathetic tone is expected to be low (11,23).

Differential effect of beta-adrenergic blockade in the LQT1, LQT2 and LQT3 genotype.   Our data indicate that beta-blockade with propranolol totally suppresses the development of TdP in the LQT1 model, largely suppresses it in LQT2 and can induce the arrhythmia in LQT3. These distinctions are due to the fact that the substrate for reentry (augmented TDR) appears only after beta-adrenergic stimulation in LQT1, may be present in the absence of sympathetic stimulation, but is greatly amplified by beta-adrenergic stimulation in LQT2 and is importantly reduced following sympathetic stimulation in LQT3.

These experimental findings appear to closely mirror the clinical experience. Beta-blockade has long been considered as a first-line therapy in patients with congenital LQTS (1–7). Patients with the LQT1 genotype are highly responsive to beta-adrenergic blocking agents (31). Beta-blockers are also effective in suppressing cardiac events in patients with the LQT2 genotype (22). The effectiveness of beta-blockers in patients with the LQT3 genotype is not well defined because of the rarity of the syndrome, although events generally occur at rest or during sleep, when heart rate is relatively slow (11). Both clinical (23) and experimental (12,14) studies have demonstrated that LQT3 displays a much steeper QT- and APD-rate relation than either LQT1 or LQT2. Thus, the substrate for reentry rapidly dissipates as heart rate is accelerated in LQT3 and reappears as heart rate is slowed. Our data of a protective effect of isoproterenol in LQT3, when coupled with the rate-slowing effect of the beta-blockers, suggest that beta-blockade might be contraindicated in LQT3. A test of this hypothesis clearly must await appropriate clinical trials.

Study limitations.   Our interpretations of the data are based on the assumption that the activity recorded from the cut surface of the perfused wedge preparation is representative of cells within the respective layers of the wall throughout the wedge. Such validation was provided in three previous studies employing the perfused wedge preparation (14,17,18).

The extent to which our pharmacologic models mimic the three forms of congenital long QT syndrome is also important. We believe that these pharmacologic models provide reasonable surrogates for the respective clinical syndromes because the behavior of the models mimics the clinical observations with respect to the electrocardiographic changes in the morphology and appearance of the T wave (32,33), rate dependence of the QT interval (23) and response to pharmacologic agents (23,31).

Finally, extrapolation of the experimental data to the clinic must be approached with great caution for obvious reasons. It is our hope that these findings will prove helpful in the design of clinical trials to test the hypotheses suggested by the study.


    Acknowledgments
 
We gratefully acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Judy Hefferon, Di Hou and Robert Goodrow. Chromanol 293B was generously donated by Hoechst Marion Roussel and D-sotalol was donated by Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals.


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported by grant HL47678 from the National Institutes of Health (C.A.) and grants from Medtronic Japan (W.S.), American Heart Association (W.S.) Suzuken Memorial Foundation (W.S.) and the Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Manhattan Masonic Districts and New York State and Florida Grand Lodges F. & A. M.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Schwartz PJ, Periti M, Malliani A. The long QT syndrome. Am Heart J. 1975;89:378–390[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Moss AJ, Schwartz PJ, Crampton RS, Locati EH, Carleen E. The long QT syndrome: a prospective international study. Circulation. 1985;71:17–21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Moss AJ, Schwartz PJ, Crampton RS, et al. The long QT syndrome: prospective longitudinal study of 328 families. Circulation. 1991;84:1136–1144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Zipes DP. The long QT interval syndrome: a Rosetta Stone for sympathetic related ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Circulation. 1991;84:1414–1419[Free Full Text]
  5. Shimizu W, Ohe T, Kurita T, et al. Early afterdepolarizations induced by isoproterenol in patients with congenital long QT syndrome. Circulation. 1991;84:1915–1923[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Shimizu W, Ohe T, Kurita T, et al. Effects of verapamil and propranolol on early afterdepolarizations and ventricular arrhythmias induced by epinephrine in congenital long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1299–1309[Abstract]
  7. Roden DM, Lazzara R, Rosen MR, et al. Multiple mechanisms in the long-QT syndrome: current knowledge, gaps and future directions. Circulation. 1996;94:1996–2012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Vincent GM. The molecular genetics of the long QT syndrome: genes causing fainting and sudden death. Annu Rev Med. 1998;49:263–274[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Priori SG, Barhanin J, Hauer RN, et al. Genetic and molecular basis of cardiac arrhythmias: impact on clinical management parts I and II. Circulation. 1999;99:518–528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Abbott GW, Sesti F, Splawski I, et al. MiRP1 forms IKr potassium channels with HERG and is associated with cardiac arrhythmia. Cell. 1999;97:175–187[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Schwartz PJ, Malteo PS, Moss AJ, et al. Gene-specific influence on the triggers for cardiac arrest in the long QT syndrome (abstr). Circulation. 1997;96:I-212
  12. Priori SG, Napolitano C, Cantu F, Brown AM, Schwartz PJ. Differential response to Na+ channel blockade, beta-adrenergic simulation and rapid pacing in a cellular model mimicking the SCN5A and HERG defects present in the long-QT syndrome. Circ Res. 1996;78:1009–1015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Antzelevitch C, Sun ZQ, Zhang ZQ, Yan GX. Cellular and ionic mechanisms underlying erythromycin-induced long QT and torsade de pointes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1836–1848[Abstract]
  14. Shimizu W, Antzelevitch C. Sodium channel block with mexiletine is effective in reducing dispersion of repolarization and preventing torsade de pointes in LQT2 and LQT3 models of the long QT syndrome. Circulation. 1997;96:2038–2047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Shimizu W, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the electrocardiographic features of the LQT1 form of the long QT syndrome: effects of b-adrenergic agonists, antagonists and sodium channel blockers on transmural dispersion of repolarization and torsade de pointes. Circulation. 1998;98:2314–2322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yan GX, Shimizu W, Antzelevitch C. Characteristics and distribution of M cells in arterially-perfused canine left ventricular wedge preparations. Circulation. 1998;98:1921–1927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Yan GX, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the normal T wave and the electrocardiographic manifestations of the long QT syndrome. Circulation. 1998;98:1928–1936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Shimizu W, Antzelevitch C. Cellular and ionic basis for T wave alternans under long QT conditions. Circulation. 1999;99:1499–1507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. El-Sherif N, Caref EB, Yin H, Restivo M. The electrophysiological mechanism of ventricular arrhythmias in the long QT syndrome: tridimensional mapping of activation and recovery patterns. Circ Res. 1996;79:474–492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Chinushi M, Restivo M, Caref EB, El-Sherif N. The electrophysiological basis of arrhythmogenicity of QT/T alternans in the long QT syndrome: tridimensional analysis of the kinetics of cardiac repolarization. Circ Res. 1998;83:614–628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Eddlestone GT, Zygmunt AC, Antzelevitch C. Larger late sodium current contributes to the longer action potential of the M cell in canine ventricular myocardium. (abstr)PACE. 1996;19:II-569
  22. Wilde AAM, Longbloed RJE, Doevendans PA, et al. Auditory stimuli as a trigger for arrhythmic events differentiate HERG-related (LQTS2) patients from KVLQT1-related patients (LQTS1). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:327–332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Locati EH, et al. Long QT syndrome patients with mutations of the SCN5A and HERG genes have differential responses to Na+ channel blockade and to increases in heart rate: implications for gene-specific therapy. Circulation. 1995;92:3381–3386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Zygmunt AC. Intracellular calcium activates chloride current in canine ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:H1984–H1995
  25. Shimizu W, Kurita T, Matsuo K, et al. Improvement of repolarization abnormalities by a K+ channel opener in the LQT1 form of congenital long QT syndrome. Circulation. 1998;97:1581–1588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Antzelevitch C, Sicouri S. Clinical relevance of cardiac arrhythmias generated by afterdepolarizations: the role of M cells in the generation of U waves, triggered activity and torsade de pointes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:259–277[Abstract]
  27. Antzelevitch C, Yan GX, Shimizu W, Burashnikov A. Electrical heterogeneity, the ECG and cardiac arrhythmias. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, editors. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Co., 1999:222–8.
  28. Liu DW, Antzelevitch C. Characteristics of the delayed rectifier current (IKr and IKs) in canine ventricular epicardial, midmyocardial and endocardial myocytes: a weaker IKs contributes to the longer action potential of the M cell. Circ Res. 1995;76:351–365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Burashnikov A, Antzelevitch C. Acceleration-induced action potential prolongation and early afterdepolarizations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9:934–948[Medline]
  30. Toivonen L, Helenius K, Viitasalo M. Electrocardiographic repolarization during stress from awakening on alarm call. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:774–779[Abstract]
  31. Vincent GM, Fox J, Zhang L, Timothy KW. Beta-blockers markedly reduce risk and syncope in KVLQT1 long QT patients. (abstr)Circulation. 1996;94:I-204
  32. Lehmann MH, Suzuki F, Fromm BS, et al. T-wave "humps" as a potential electrocardiographic marker of the long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:746–754[Abstract]
  33. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Benhorin J, et al. ECG T wave patterns in genetically distinct forms of the hereditary long QT syndrome. Circulation. 1995;92:2929–2934[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cleveland Clinic Journal of MedicineHome page
E. LEVINE, S. Z. ROSERO, A. S. BUDZIKOWSKI, A. J. MOSS, W. ZAREBA, and J. P. DAUBERT
Congenital long QT syndrome: Considerations for primary care physicians
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, August 1, 2008; 75(8): 591 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. Chinushi, D. Izumi, K. Iijima, S. Ahara, S. Komura, H. Furushima, Y. Hosaka, and Y. Aizawa
Antiarrhythmic vs. pro-arrhythmic effects depending on the intensity of adrenergic stimulation in a canine anthopleurin-A model of type-3 long QT syndrome
Europace, February 1, 2008; 10(2): 249 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Antzelevitch
Role of spatial dispersion of repolarization in inherited and acquired sudden cardiac death syndromes
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): H2024 - H2038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. Antzelevitch
Ionic, molecular, and cellular bases of QT-interval prolongation and torsade de pointes
Europace, September 1, 2007; 9(suppl_4): iv4 - iv15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. T. Morita, D. P. Zipes, H. Morita, and J. Wu
Analysis of action potentials in the canine ventricular septum: No phenotypic expression of M cells
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2007; 74(1): 96 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. D. Whyte, S. Sanatani, J. Lim, and P. D. Booker
A Comparison of the Effect on Dispersion of Repolarization of Age-Adjusted MAC Values of Sevoflurane in Children
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2007; 104(2): 277 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
I. Topilski, O. Rogowski, R. Rosso, D. Justo, Y. Copperman, M. Glikson, B. Belhassen, M. Hochenberg, and S. Viskin
The Morphology of the QT Interval Predicts Torsade de Pointes During Acquired Bradyarrhythmias
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 23, 2007; 49(3): 320 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
G. Thomas, I. S. Gurung, M. J. Killeen, P. Hakim, C. A. Goddard, M. P. Mahaut-Smith, W. H. Colledge, A. A. Grace, and C. L.-H. Huang
Effects of L-type Ca2+ channel antagonism on ventricular arrhythmogenesis in murine hearts containing a modification in the Scn5a gene modelling human long QT syndrome 3
J. Physiol., January 1, 2007; 578(1): 85 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. L. Tan, A. Bardai, W. Shimizu, A. J. Moss, E. Schulze-Bahr, T. Noda, and A. A. M. Wilde
Genotype-Specific Onset of Arrhythmias in Congenital Long-QT Syndrome: Possible Therapy Implications
Circulation, November 14, 2006; 114(20): 2096 - 2103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. Stengl, C. Ramakers, D. W. Donker, A. Nabar, A. V. Rybin, R. L.H.M.G. Spatjens, T. van der Nagel, W. K.W.H. Wodzig, K. R. Sipido, G. Antoons, et al.
Temporal patterns of electrical remodeling in canine ventricular hypertrophy: Focus on IKs downregulation and blunted {beta}-adrenergic activation
Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2006; 72(1): 90 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Viitasalo, L. Oikarinen, H. Swan, H. Vaananen, J. Jarvenpaa, H. Hietanen, J. Karjalainen, and L. Toivonen
Effects of Beta-Blocker Therapy on Ventricular Repolarization Documented by 24-h Electrocardiography in Patients With Type 1 Long-QT Syndrome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): 747 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
W. Shimizu
The long QT syndrome: Therapeutic implications of a genetic diagnosis
Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2005; 67(3): 347 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G.-B. Nam, A. Burashnikov, and C. Antzelevitch
Cellular Mechanisms Underlying the Development of Catecholaminergic Ventricular Tachycardia
Circulation, May 31, 2005; 111(21): 2727 - 2733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. P. Katra and K. R. Laurita
Cellular Mechanism of Calcium-Mediated Triggered Activity in the Heart
Circ. Res., March 18, 2005; 96(5): 535 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. D.J. Ten Harkel, M. Witsenburg, P. L. de Jong, L. Jordaens, M. Wijman, and A. A.M. Wilde
Efficacy of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a neonate with LQT3 associated arrhythmias
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(1): 77 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. Antzelevitch
Cardiac repolarization. The long and short of it
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(s2): S3 - S9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. D. Whyte, P. D. Booker, and D. G. Buckley
The Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane on the QT Interval and Transmural Dispersion of Repolarization in Children
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 71 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
Y. Oginosawa, T. Nagatomo, H. Abe, N. Makita, J. C. Makielski, and Y. Nakashima
Intrinsic mechanism of the enhanced rate-dependent QT shortening in the R1623Q mutant of the LQT3 syndrome
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2005; 65(1): 138 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
C.-C. Chang, S. Acharfi, M.-H. Wu, F.-T. Chiang, J.-K. Wang, T.-C. Sung, and M. Chahine
A novel SCN5A mutation manifests as a malignant form of long QT syndrome with perinatal onset of tachycardia/bradycardia
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2004; 64(2): 268 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
N. Ueda, D. P Zipes, and J. Wu
Prior ischemia enhances arrhythmogenicity in isolated canine ventricular wedge model of long QT 3
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2004; 63(1): 69 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. M. Fish, J. M. Di Diego, V. Nesterenko, and C. Antzelevitch
Epicardial Activation of Left Ventricular Wall Prolongs QT Interval and Transmural Dispersion of Repolarization: Implications for Biventricular Pacing
Circulation, May 4, 2004; 109(17): 2136 - 2142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]