cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35:258-259
© 2000 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barillà, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barillà, F.

CORRESPONDENCE

Reply

Francesco Barillà, MDa

a Second Section of Cardiology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161 Rome, Italy


We are grateful to Dr. Barletta for his comments. Obviously, the findings we have reported constitute an intermediate step of a biphasic response phenomenon, as stated by Dr. Barletta. However, a 5-min step protocol for low dose dobutamine echocardiography is common (1,2), and a biphasic response (i.e., wall motion improvement followed by worsening) is rarely observed at low doses of 5 to 10 µg/kg body weight per min (3). Nevertheless, no change in wall motion and thickening occurred during the 3 min after tracer injection, even when we used 10 µg/kg per min of dobutamine.

We also wish to emphasize that our study was not intended to describe the behavior of inotropic contractile reserve during low dose dobutamine infusion, but it was aimed at investigating the pathophysiologic and clinical implications of the presumed mismatch between perfusion and contractility in areas with severely hypoperfused viable myocardium.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Barillà F, Gheorghiade M, Alam M, Khaja F, Goldstein S. Low-dose dobutamine in patients with acute myocardial infarction identifies viable but not contractile myocardium and predicts the magnitude of improvement in wall motion abnormalities in response to coronary revascularization. Am Heart J. 1991;122:1522–1531[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Panza JA, Dilsizian V, Laurienzo JM, Curiel RV, Katsiyiannis PT. Relation between thallium uptake and contractile response to dobutamine: implications regarding myocardial viability in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Ciculation. 1995;91:990–998
  3. Afridi I, Kleiman NS, Raizner AE, Zoghbi WA. Dobutamine echocardiography in myocardial hibernation: optimal dose and accuracy in predicting recovery of ventricular function after coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1995;91:663–670[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barillà, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barillà, F.

 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home