Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.



Figure 7 Effective refractory periods at multiple cycle lengths (standard extra-stimulus method) and the effective refractory period during AF (ERPAF). The effective refractory periods determined by the standard extra-stimulus method at multiple cycle lengths and ERPAF in the baseline condition (circles) and after pilsicainide administration (squares) are illustrated. Data are shown mean ± SD. In the baseline condition, ERPAF was shorter than the effective refractory period determined by the standard extra-stimulus method (basic cycle length 150 ms). After pilsicainide administration, the effective refractory period was increased particularly at shorter cycle lengths, which was most prominent during AF, reflecting use-dependent block property of this drug. *p < 0.01 versus baseline; {dagger}p < 0.05 versus baseline.





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement