|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 34:1452-1460 © 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |








* Unita di Malattie Metaboliche, Cattedra di Medicina Interna, Divisione di Medicina, Milano, Italy
Cattedra di Clinica Medica Generale e Terapia Medica, Università Vita-Salute, Milano, Italy
Divisione di Statistica e Epidemiologia, Milano, Italy
Divisione di Cardiologia, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
Manuscript received July 7, 1998; revised manuscript received May 27, 1999, accepted June 29, 1999.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. PierMarco Piatti, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milano, Italy
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study was performed to characterize the endothelial and metabolic alterations of patients with angina and angiographically normal coronary arteries ("cardiac" syndrome X [CSX]) compared with subjects with insulin resistance syndrome ("metabolic" syndrome X [MSX]) and normal controls.
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have found high endothelin-1 levels, impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation and insulin resistance in patients with angina pectoris and angiographically normal coronary arteries. On the other hand, subjects with insulin resistance syndrome have shown high endothelin-1 levels.
METHODS
Thirty-five subjects were studied: 13 patients with angina pectoris and angiographically normal coronary arteries (CSX group); 9 subjects with insulin resistance syndrome (MSX group) and 13 normal controls. All subjects received an acute intravenous bolus of insulin (0.1 U/kg) combined with a euglycemic clamp and forearm indirect calorimetry. Endothelin-1 levels, nitrite/nitrate (NOx) levels, end products of nitric oxide metabolism, glucose infusion rates (index of insulin sensitivity) and their incremental areas (
AUCs [area under curves]) were measured during this period.
RESULTS
Basal endothelin-1 levels were higher in CSX and MSX groups than in normal controls (8.19 ± 0.46 and 6.97 ± 0.88 vs. 3.67 ± 0.99 pg/ml; p < 0.01), while basal NOx levels were significantly higher in MSX group than in CSX and normal controls (36.5 ± 4.0 vs. 24.2 ± 3.3 and 26.8 ± 3.2 mol/liter, p < 0.05). After insulin administration, the
AUCs of NOx (p < 0.05) were lower in CSX group than in MSX and normal controls, and the
AUCs of endothelin-1 were lower in group CSX than in normal controls. Glucose infusion rate was significantly lower in CSX and MSx groups than in normal controls (p < 0.01), suggesting that in both CSX and MSX groups insulin resistance is present. A positive correlation was found between the
AUCs of nitric oxide and the AUCs of glucose infusion rate.
CONCLUSIONS
Blunted nitric oxide and endothelin responsiveness to intravenously infused insulin is a typical feature of patients with angina pectoris and angiographically normal coronary arteries and may contribute to the microvascular dysfunction observed in these subjects.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recently, increased levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1) have been found in these patients (9), suggesting that this powerful vasoactive peptide (10) may play a role in this syndrome. Furthermore, other studies (1113) suggested that CSX patients are insulin resistant and exhibit decreased insulin-induced glucose disposal, impaired total body glucose oxidation and reduced nonoxidative glucose metabolism. Conversely, their liver glucose output and lipid oxidation are similar to those of normal controls (11). On the other hand, increased ET-1 levels have been also found in insulin resistance syndrome ("metabolic" syndrome X [MSX]), characterized by the association in the same subject of insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, impaired glucose tolerance, hypertriglyceridemia, visceral obesity and hypertension (14). Until now, it has been impossible to define whether the endothelial and metabolic abnormalities previously shown in CSX patients have any association with coronary microvascular dysfunction.
The purpose of our study was to characterize the endothelial and metabolic alterations of CSX patients compared with MSX subjects and normal controls. In particular, our interest was extended in evaluating whether altered nitric oxide (nitrite/nitrate [NOx]) and ET-1 responsiveness to intravenously infused insulin is a typical feature of CSX patients or is a common feature when insulin resistance is present. Therefore, an intravenous insulin bolus combined with a euglycemic clamp (14) was performed in CSX patients, in MSX subjects without cardiovascular symptoms and in normal controls. This approach allowed us to evaluate simultaneously insulin sensitivity and dynamic effects of insulin on ET-1 and NOx release. In order to evaluate intracellular glucose metabolism, forearm muscle indirect calorimetry was also performed.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Table 1 clinical, hormonal and metabolic data of the three groups are represented. Body weight, BMI, waist/hip ratio, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, basal glucose, insulin, triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and free fatty acid levels were similar in CSX group and in normal controls. In contrast, all these variables were higher in MSX group, as expected. Lactate (557.7 ± 68.8, 643.3 ± 124.6 and 553.5 ± 153.7 µmol/liter), pyruvate (61.7 ± 8.9, 78.2 ± 26.1 and 61.6 ± 14.8 µmol/liter) and alanine levels (242 ± 26.3, 246.5 ± 21.5 and 195.4 ± 12.2 µmol/l) were similar in the three groups.
|
After a 30-min period of equilibration, all subjects received an intravenous bolus of 0.1 U/kg insulin diluted in 1 ml saline (14) combined with the euglycemic clamp technique (15). The intravenous bolus of insulin, or insulin tolerance test (ITT), used since 1971 (16) and more recently revised by Bonora et al. (17), is a well-known and simple method to evaluate insulin sensitivity. The only modification carried out in the present study was the addition of a euglycemic clamp to avoid the influence of counterregulatory hormones on endothelial factor release. The euglycemic clamp technique (15) is a widely used method by which blood glucose levels are maintained at baseline values by means of a variable 20% glucose infusion according to the blood glucose measurements obtained every 5 min. By using this method, the amount of glucose infused during the test corresponds to the degree of insulin sensitivity of the subjects.
To validate our method, we assessed the relationship between insulin sensitivity measured with our insulin bolus test and the insulin sensitivity index measured with the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT), according to Bergman et al. (18)another test that is considered a reference test for the measurement of insulin sensitivity. We found that there was a highly significant correlation between the two insulin sensitivity indices (r = 0.80, p < 0.01). The choice to use the FSIGT as a reference method for our test was related to the fact that in both cases, during the first 60 min of the test, insulin levels are not in steady state.
Because, during the euglycemic clamp studies, arterialized instead of arterial samples were performed, in a previous study, we evaluated whether arterialized ET-1 levels are a reliable index of forearm arterial levels (14). In the preparatory study, we found that there was a highly significant correlation between arterial and arterialized ET-1 levels in 30 subjects (r = 0.96; p < 0.001) with a slope not different from 1 (0.93 ± 0.51; p < 0.5) and an intercept not different from 0 (0.140 ± 0.05; p < 0.6). In the present study, we evaluated whether arterialized NOx levels are a reliable index of forearm arterial levels. Arterial and arterialized samplings were obtained simultaneously in 20 subjects (5 CSX patients, 7 MSX subjects and 8 normal controls). There was a highly significant correlation between arterial and arterialized NOx levels (r = 0.90; p < 0.001), with a slope not different from 1 (0.93 ± 0.11; p < 0.16) and an intercept not different from 0 (1.32 ± 2.86; p < 0.11). Therefore, arterialized ET-1 and NOx levels are a reliable index of forearm arterial levels.
Arterialized samples for ET-1, NOx and insulin were withdrawn at time 30, 20, 10, 0, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 and 60 min after the insulin bolus. Arterialized and deep venous samples for glucose and intermediate metabolite (lactate, pyruvate, alanine) measurements were withdrawn at 30, 15, 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 and 60 min. Arterialized samples for triglyceride and free fatty acid measurements were drawn at 5 and 0 min. This test thus permits simultaneous evaluation of insulin sensitivity, forearm indirect calorimetry, ET-1 and NOx response to insulin.
Blood flow and blood pressure measurements. Blood flow of the proximal forearm was measured immediately after each blood sample by venous occlusion plethysmography at time 30, 15, 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 and 60 min. Two cuffs were inflated simultaneously to obtain a collecting pressure of 60 mm Hg and a wrist occlusion pressure of 220 mm Hg. Changes in forearm volume were measured by means of a temperature-compensated mercury rubber strain gauge placed distally to the tip of the cannula, as previously reported (19). Blood flow was expressed in ml/min/100 ml forearm tissue volume. In addition, at least three determinations of arterial blood pressure were performed at 10-min intervals after the start of the test.
Forearm metabolite balance and forearm indirect calorimetry studies. Forearm balances of glucose, lactate, pyruvate and alanine were calculated by using the Fick principle: (arterialized blood concentration) (deep venous blood concentration) x forearm blood flow. Forearm glucose oxidation (FGOx) rates were estimated by forearm indirect calorimetry using arterialized and deep venous blood samples obtained at 30, 15, 0 min and every 15 min after the start of the test, for the measurements of O2 and CO2 as previously published in nonsteady-state conditions (19,20). In addition, in order to evaluate the degree of blood CO2 variability in the same subject in the absence of external stimulation, eight subjects were studied in the fasting state, and arterialized and deep venous CO2 content was measured every 15 min for 1 h. The coefficients of variation (CV) of the arterialized and deep venous CO2 were 2.0 ± 0.3% and 3.34 ± 0.26%, respectively.
Three sets of arteriovenous measurements were performed at each time point. Forearm O2 consumption (VO2) and CO2 production (VCO2) were calculated as the product of the arterialized-venous difference and forearm blood flow. FGOx was derived according to Natali et al. (21), and nonoxidative glycolysis was derived as the net balance of lactate, pyruvate and alanine, in glucose equivalents. In addition, forearm glucose storage (glycogen formation [FGSt]) was calculated as the difference between glucose uptake and the sum of glucose oxidation and nonoxidative glycolysis (22).
Assays. Blood glucose was measured with a glucose-oxidase based analyzer (YSI, Yellow Springs, Ohio). Samples for intermediate metabolite measurements were collected into weighted tubes containing chilled 0.5M perchloric acid. All samples were assayed for metabolites and insulin in a single assay. Alanine (intraassay CV 3%, interassay CV 3%), lactate (intraassay CV 4.0%, interassay CV 7.5%) and pyruvate (intraassay CV 8.0%, interassay CV 9.5%) were assayed using automated enzymatic spectrofluorimetric methods adapted to COBAS FARA II (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) (23). Plasma-free fatty acid (intraassay CV 3%, interassay CV 3%) and serum triglyceride levels were measured using automated enzymatic spectrophotometric techniques adapted to COBAS FARA II (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Serum insulin levels (intraassay CV 3.0%, interassay CV 5.0%) were measured by radioimmunoassay using commercial kits (Insulin I125 Ria kit; Incstar Corporation, Stillwater, Minnesota).
ET-1 samples were measured with a commercial radioimmunoassay (RIA) kit (Biomedica Gruppe, Wien, Germany). In particular, in order to enrich the peptide from the plasma sample to measurable values, ET-1 was extracted on SepPack C18, and the eluate was evaporated in a Speedvac concentrator (Speed Vac SC110, Savant, Roma, Italy). The samples were then reconstituted in 250 µl of RIA buffer and assayed. In the RIA kit, the antiserum was a rabbit-anti-ET-1 antibody, and the tracer was I125-labeled ET-1. An intraassay CV of 3.0%, and an interassay CV of 11.9% were reported.
Nitrite/nitrate levels were evaluated through the measurement of metabolic end products, that is, nitrite and nitrate, using enzymatic catalysis coupled with Griess reaction, as previously reported (24).
Forearm arterialized and venous blood gas samples were analyzed at the patients bedside (Corning Medical and Scientific, Medfield, Massachusetts). Plasma CO2 content was calculated from measured CO2 tension and pH, and adjusted to whole CO2 blood content using an empirically derived regression equation (25). O2 content was calculated from the hemoglobin content and percent of saturation, using a constant of 1.34. The CV was calculated for each individual, and the mean of intrasubject CVs were 0.1% for pH, 0.6% for arterialized CO2, 1.3% for forearm venous CO2 and 1.5% for arterialized O2, while mean intrasubject CV was 4.6% for venous O2 content.
Statistical analysis.
All values are expressed as mean ± standard error at each time interval. Areas under the curves (
AUCs) were calculated for each parameter by the trapezoidal rule. Comparisons within groups were performed by means of Student t test for paired data. Comparisons among groups were performed by means of analysis of variance followed by the Scheffe F test when indicated. Linear regression analyses or Spearman test were used as appropriate. A two-tailed probability level of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Forearm glucose uptake (FGU), FGOx, nonoxidative glycolysis, FGSt and lipid oxidation (data not shown) were similar in the three groups (Fig. 2).
|
In Figure 1, ET-1, NOx, blood pressure and forearm blood flow levels after insulin bolus are reported. Endothelin-1 response was flat in CSX group, while a significant increase in ET-1 levels was elicited in MSX group, similar to that observed in normal controls. This determined a significantly lower
AUC of ET-1 in CSX group than in normal controls, while there were no significant differences between MSX group and normal controls. Nitrite/nitrate levels did not significantly increase in CSX group, while they increased significantly, with a similar pattern, in MSX group and in normal controls. Nitrite/nitrate levels remained significantly higher in MSX group than in CSX group, while no differences were found between MSX group and normal controls. The
AUCs of NOx were significantly lower in CSX group than in MSX group and in normal controls (p < 0.01), while no differences were found between MSX group and normal controls.
After insulin bolus, arterial systolic and diastolic blood pressure slightly decreased in all groups, however, blood pressure remained significantly higher in MSX group than in CSX group and in normal controls.
Forearm blood flow remained unchanged in CSX group, while it significantly decreased during the first 15 min in MSX group, returning at basal levels in the second half of the test. On the contrary, forearm blood flow was significantly higher during the last 30 min of the test in normal controls.
Insulin effects on glucose utilization and forearm indirect calorimetry. In Figure 2, the patterns of glucose utilization and forearm glucose metabolism after insulin bolus are reported.
Glucose infusion rates (GIRs) were significantly lower in CSX and MSX groups than in normal controls throughout the test. The AUCs for GIR were significantly lower in CSX and MSX groups than in normal controls (1,242.2 ± 126.7 and 651.4 ± 66.1 vs. 2,143.6 ± 178.7 µM/kg/min; p < 0.05).
It is interesting that the
AUC of GIR was significantly higher in CSX than MSX group (p < 0.05). A similar pattern was observed in FGU.
AUCs of FGOx were significantly lower in CSX and MSX groups than in normal controls without differences between the two groups.
Nonoxidative glycolysis tended to be greater in CSX group, while it remained similar to baseline in MSX group and slightly decreased in normal controls. The
AUC of FGSt was lower in MSX group than in normal controls (44.1 ± 20.3 vs. 116.3 ± 23.3 µmol/100 ml forearm/min; p < 0.05). In CSX group, the
AUC of FGSt was 106.4 ± 48.7 µmol/100 ml forearm/min (NS vs. normal controls). The profiles and the
AUC of lipid oxidation were similar in all groups (data not shown).
By pooling all the subjects of the three groups, a negative correlation was found between basal ET-1 levels and the
AUC of NOx levels (r = 0.34, p < 0.05; data not shown). In addition, a negative correlation between basal ET-1 levels and FGU was observed (r = 0.47; p < 0.01; data not shown) and a positive correlation was found between the AUCs of GIR and NOx levels (r = 0.38; p < 0.05; Fig. 3).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we found that there are some similarities between "cardiac" and "metabolic" syndrome X concerning the presence of high basal ET-1 levels and insulin resistance in both groups. On the other hand, the evaluation of the dynamic response after insulin stimulation demonstrated that there are some important differences between the two syndromes, such as the presence of different basal NOx levels and insulin-stimulated ET-1 and NOx releases. In addition, MSX subjects were more insulin resistant, and insulin-mediated FGSt was compromised only in these subjects. Similarities and differences between "cardiac" and "metabolic" syndrome X related to endothelial-factor release and insulin sensitivity are reported in Table 2.
|
Insulin-mediated glucose metabolism. In our study, similar to MSX subjects, the presence of supraphysiological insulin levels did not overcome the defect in insulin sensitivity in CSX patients. However, even if CSX patients and MSX subjects are less sensitive to insulin than normal controls, the degree of insulin resistance is different in the two groups, and, in particular, MSX subjects are significantly more insulin-resistant than CSX patients.
The presence of insulin resistance in CSX patients has already been described by Botker et al. (11), who found a reduction in total body glucose disposal and oxidation at physiological insulin levels (about 770 pM). Taking the results of both studies together, it is tempting to speculate that in CSX patients the metabolic action of insulin is defective and involves aerobic glycolysis and that such a defect might involve the skeletal muscle as well as the heart (32). In Figure 2, an uncoupling of glycolysis and glucose oxidation in response to insulin in CSX patients can be observed. Similar data, but relative to myocardial metabolism, have been reported in these patients by Egashira et al. (6) and Camici et al. (32). In the first study, an increase in myocardial lactate production was found after papaverine infusion (6), while in the second study, carbohydrate oxidation was not stimulated by pacing, and net pyruvate release was observed at maximal pacing and during recovery (32). In the present study, an increase in skeletal muscle nonoxidative glycolysis was also found in MSX subjects. From our data, it is impossible to draw any conclusion about the effect of insulin on myocardial metabolism in these subjects, although a normal insulin-induced myocardial glucose uptake has been found in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus despite a severe decrease in insulin-induced skeletal glucose uptake (33). Although evaluation of myocardial lactate production in subjects with insulin resistance syndrome was beyond the scope of the present study, we believe that this issue requires further investigation.
Another important difference between "cardiac" and "metabolic" syndrome X was related to glucose storage measured during the test, which was correctly efficient in CSX patients while severely impaired in MSX subjects. These findings suggest that MSX subjects show a more severe impairment in the intracellular partitioning of muscle glucose metabolism.
Relationship between endothelial factors and glucose metabolism.
One interesting finding of the present study was the existence of a relationship linking endothelial factors and insulin action to glucose metabolism, as demonstrated by the positive correlations between the AUCs of GIR and the
AUCs of NOx levels. However, our data do not allow us to clarify whether insulin resistance in these subjects was mediated by a blunted response of NOx to insulin or by ET-1 overproduction, or both. Further studies are required to answer this question, although a negative correlation between basal ET-1 levels and FGU could suggest that ET-1 might directly influence glucose metabolism.
Clinical implications. Whereas previous studies have shown a strict correlation between the increment in triglyceride and insulin levels and the presence of high ET-1 levels in MSX subjects without myocardial complications (14), the mechanism responsible for the increase in basal ET-1 levels in CSX patients remains unknown. In fact, the latter group of subjects did not show hypertension (34), hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia and diabetes (14) or other diseases, such as ischemic heart disease (35) and atherosclerosis (36), that could determine or be determined by a sustained stimulation of ET-1 release. In a previous study, the chronic administration of L-arginine decreased ET-1 levels and angina episodes in CSX patients (37), suggesting that there is a defect of nitric oxide activity (possibly synthesis) in these subjects. The findings of the present study may confirm this hypothesisbut only because of the supraphysiological insulin levels.
Study limitations.
In the present study, we used the forearm balance technique to measure FGU before and after insulin administration. Although, from the existing literature, it frequently appears that the forearm technique is used to measure FGU during a perturbation (19,20,3841), this approach does have limitations. In fact, the assessment of glucose uptake across the forearm hinges upon the Fick principle, which is valid only at steady-state conditions when blood flow is constant and arterial and venous glucose concentrations are stable. Under nonsteady-state conditions, when blood flow or glucose concentrations change in time, the Fick principle does not hold, and systematic errors may affect the estimated fluxes. Therefore, the FGU results obtained in the present study during the insulin perturbation provide only qualitative insights into insulin-stimulated FGU in the two groups. On the other hand, even though there were systematic errors, they were likely to affect all groups to a similar extent. As a result, the time course of the difference among the FGUs in CSX patients, MSX subjects and normal controls was probably more reliable than the individual FGU profiles, suggesting an impairment of FGU in CSX patients and MSX subjects. As a matter of fact, the difference between the profiles of FGU at the regional level parallels the difference between the profiles of GIRs measuring glucose metabolism (glucose uptake, plus production) at the whole-body level. This is confirmed by a direct, significant correlation between the
AUCs of FGU and the AUCs of GIR (r = 0.43; p < 0.01). All in all, we are confident that our results suggesting a defect of insulin activity on glucose uptake in CSX patients are correct.
Conclusions. In summary, similar to MSX subjects, CSX patients show high basal ET-1 levels and insulin resistance. On the other hand, CSX patients exhibit a decrease of NOx and ET-1 release after insulin stimulation, while MSX subjects show high basal NOx levels, normal NOx release after insulin stimulation and a severe impairment of glucose storage.
In conclusion, blunted nitric oxide and endothelin responsiveness to intravenously infused insulin is a typical feature of CSX patients and may contribute to the microvascular dysfunction observed in these subjects.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Muniyappa, M. Montagnani, K. K. Koh, and M. J. Quon Cardiovascular Actions of Insulin Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2007; 28(5): 463 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lteif, P. Vaishnava, A. D. Baron, and K. J. Mather Endothelin Limits Insulin Action in Obese/Insulin-Resistant Humans Diabetes, March 1, 2007; 56(3): 728 - 734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jadhav, W. Ferrell, I. A. Greer, J. R. Petrie, S. M. Cobbe, and N. Sattar Effects of Metformin on Microvascular Function and Exercise Tolerance in Women With Angina and Normal Coronary Arteries: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): 956 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Jadhav, J Petrie, W Ferrell, S Cobbe, and N Sattar Insulin resistance as a contributor to myocardial ischaemia independent of obstructive coronary atheroma: a role for insulin sensitisation? Heart, December 1, 2004; 90(12): 1379 - 1383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Monti, C. Landoni, E. Setola, E. Galluccio, P. Lucotti, E. P. Sandoli, A. Origgi, G. Lucignani, P. Piatti, and F. Fazio Myocardial insulin resistance associated with chronic hypertriglyceridemia and increased FFA levels in Type 2 diabetic patients Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): H1225 - H1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Piatti, C. Di Mario, L. D. Monti, G. Fragasso, F. Sgura, A. Caumo, E. Setola, P. Lucotti, E. Galluccio, C. Ronchi, et al. Association of Insulin Resistance, Hyperleptinemia, and Impaired Nitric Oxide Release With In-Stent Restenosis in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stenting Circulation, October 28, 2003; 108(17): 2074 - 2081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Wilkes, A. Hevener, and J. Olefsky Chronic Endothelin-1 Treatment Leads to Insulin Resistance In Vivo Diabetes, August 1, 2003; 52(8): 1904 - 1909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Kidawa, M Krzeminska-Pakula, J Z Peruga, and J D Kasprzak Arterial dysfunction in syndrome X: results of arterial reactivity and pulse wave propagation tests Heart, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 422 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Piatti, G. Fragasso, L. D. Monti, E. Setola, P. Lucotti, I. Fermo, R. Paroni, E. Galluccio, G. Pozza, S. Chierchia, et al. Acute Intravenous l-Arginine Infusion Decreases Endothelin-1 Levels and Improves Endothelial Function in Patients With Angina Pectoris and Normal Coronary Arteriograms: Correlation With Asymmetric Dimethylarginine Levels Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107(3): 429 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Fernandez-Real, G. Penarroja, C. Richart, A. Castro, J. Vendrell, M. Broch, A. Lopez-Bermejo, and W. Ricart G Protein {beta}3 Gene Variant, Vascular Function, and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 124 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gulli, R. Cemin, P. Pancera, G. Menegatti, C. Vassanelli, and A. Cevese Evidence of parasympathetic impairment in some patients with cardiac syndrome X Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2001; 52(2): 208 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rodriguez-Porcel, A. Lerman, P. J. M. Best, J. D. Krier, C. Napoli, and L. O. Lerman Hypercholesterolemia impairs myocardial perfusion and permeability: role of oxidative stress and endogenous scavenging activity J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2001; 37(2): 608 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Desideri, A. Gaspardone, M. Gentile, A. Santucci, P. A. Gioffre, and C. Ferri Endothelial Activation in Patients With Cardiac Syndrome X Circulation, November 7, 2000; 102(19): 2359 - 2364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. PIATTI, L. D. MONTI, I. ZAVARONI, G. VALSECCHI, C. VAN PHAN, S. COSTA, M. CONTI, E. P. SANDOLI, B. SOLERTE, G. POZZA, et al. Alterations in Nitric Oxide/Cyclic-GMP Pathway in Nondiabetic Siblings of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2000; 85(7): 2416 - 2420. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Fernandez-Real, B. Lainez, J. Vendrell, M. Rigla, A. Castro, G. Penarroja, M. Broch, A. Perez, C. Richart, P. Engel, et al. Shedding of TNF-alpha receptors, blood pressure, and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes mellitus Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2002; 282(4): E952 - E959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||