|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 34:618-620 © 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |




* George M. and Linda H. Kaufman Center for Heart Failure, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Department of Cardiology, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Epidemiology, and Biostatistics, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Manuscript received March 19, 1999; accepted May 10, 1999.
Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Michael S. Lauer, Department of Cardiology, Desk F25, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195.
lauerm{at}cesmtp.ccf.org
The use of "cardiac death" instead of all-cause death as an end point in clinical investigation is, we believe, hazardous for many reasons. In reality, data obtained from death certificates or from medical records are haphazard, biased and often grossly inaccurate. Notwithstanding these concerns, determination of cause of death is inherently difficult owing to the presence of concurrent comorbid illnesses, a low autopsy rate and an inadequate understanding of complex disease processes. Coronary heart disease may, in fact, be present and significant at the time of death, and yet not be the primary reason a patient may die. The ultimate result of using specific causes of death as an end point is that "softness" is introduced into a study that otherwise would be based on the strength of the "hardest" end point of all: all-cause mortality.
Data that are typically obtained as part of high-quality prospective clinical investigations or trials are carefully and systematically obtained, with great efforts made to maintain consistent prespecified definitions, to reduce risk for errors, to minimize missing data elements and to avoid potential biases of ascertainment (2). This cannot be said for data obtained from death certificates or medical records (3), even when incorporated into formalized "classification committees" (4). Clinically important data may be missing because of clerical errors and because they are recorded by busy, harried practitioners who are not vested in high-quality epidemiologic outcomes research. Physicians recording death notes or death certificates often are unfamiliar with patients long-term medical issues and may be confused by changing medical terminology (5). From the clinical investigators point of view, there is no way that data quality and data definitions can be adequately assessed and controlled.
Most physicians do not receive any kind of formal training in filling out death certificates properly; it is very common for physicians to confuse underlying cause of death with mechanisms of death (6). The underlying cause of death is "the disease or injury that initiated the train of morbid events resulting in death;" this can be thought of as, "In the absence of the underlying cause, the patient would be alive today" (6). Conversely, a mechanism of death is "a physiologic or biochemical disturbance produced by a cause of death" (6). A study of 384 death certificates at a university teaching hospital showed that 59% were incorrectly filled out (3). Indeed, a very common error included recording a mechanism of death (such as multiple organ system failure) without providing an underlying cause (such as metastatic lung cancer). Some death certificates simply stated that patients died of "cardiac arrest" without any other information added. Ultimately, everyone dies of cardiac arrest (3)!
Death certificate and death note data may suffer from serious biases of ascertainment. Physicians who record these data may well be aware of prior test results or treatment; this knowledge may color their interpretations of cause of death, particularly among patients with multiple complex illnesses. Simply knowing that a patient had a stress nuclear study or was enrolled in an unstable angina trial, for example, may bias a physician into categorizing a death as cardiac when it may not have been. A recent study, for example, demonstrated a strong relationship between persistent minor electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities and cardiac death as assessed by death certificates (7). It is quite possible that the physicians who filled out the death certificates knew that the patients had abnormal ECGs and this might have biased their assessments.
Assessment of the accuracy of death certificates is inherently problematic because there is no standard for cause of death, except perhaps for the autopsy, which is now infrequently performed. Nonetheless, a number of careful studies have raised serious questions about the validity of death certificates and clinical determinations of cause of death (810). A study of 257 autopsied cases in Atlanta, Georgia found improper recording on the original death certificate of the underlying cause of death in 42% of cases, with underreporting of malignancies and overreporting of vascular deaths (9). Another study (10) of 272 randomly chosen autopsies found a major disagreement between the death certificate and autopsy in 29% of cases, leading to a change of cause of death to an entirely different etiologic category. The proportion of patients designated by the death certificate as dying of "circulatory" causes who had this confirmed by autopsy was only 75%; conversely, among patients found by autopsy to have died of circulatory causes, only 82% of death certificates noted this.
A very recent report from the Framingham Heart Study (11,12) compared causes of death among 2,683 decedents as identified by death certificates and by a physician panel. Of 942 patients listed by the death certificate of dying from coronary heart disease, only 645 (67%) had this confirmed by the physician panel. The situation was even worse for stroke, where the corresponding positive predictive value of the death certificate was only 59%. Inaccurate reporting of coronary heart disease death was strongly related to increasing age: among patients with ages of 65 to 74, 75 to 84 and
85, differential rates of reported versus confirmed coronary heart disease deaths were 18%, 31% and 109%, respectively. Another noteworthy finding was that the physician panel could not confidently state a cause of death in 9% of patients; among these the death certificate listed coronary heart disease as the cause of death in 51%. The investigators cite this finding as suggesting that physicians may use the diagnosis of coronary heart disease as a "default" (11).
Even when a cause of death seems obvious, careful study may reveal gross inaccuracies. For example, a study of 109 deaths among patients with implantable defibrillators found that 17 were identified on clinical grounds as being due to "sudden cardiac death" (13). On the basis of autopsy and interrogation of the defibrillators, sudden death could only be confirmed in seven patients (42%). Furthermore, six patients died of noncardiac causes, including pulmonary embolism, cerebral infarction and ruptured aortic aneurysm.
Even if cardiac death could be accurately distinguished from noncardiac deaths, failure to use all-cause death as the primary end point may lead to inappropriate interpretations of data (4). If a particular type of observation or treatment is in fact associated with a lower likelihood of cardiac death, but is also associated with higher rates of noncardiac death, neither patients nor investigators should be comforted. In contrast, if there is no difference in noncardiac deaths among different patient groups, the use of all-cause mortality would only bias results toward the null hypothesis, much like nondifferential misclassification bias. Thus, any observed differences in all-cause mortality reflect at least as great a difference in cardiac mortality. This is indeed what was observed in the recent study of minor ECG changes and death: minor ECG changes strongly predicted all-cause death, but to a somewhat less degree than "cardiac death" (7). Indeed, focus on cause-specific, rather than all-cause mortality, as an end point can lead to serious confusion, as in, for example, the controversy regarding cholesterol lowering and violent death or suicide (14,15) before the publication of the 4S Study (16). Another example would be the question of whether amiodarone should be used as a prophylactic agent, because a large trial demonstrated no effects on all-cause mortality, although a reduction in "arrhythmic deaths" was noted (4,17).
As Miss Buttercup in Gilbert and Sullivans HMS Pinafore said when revealing a case of mistaken identity, "Things are seldom what they seem; skim milk masquerades as cream." Careful clinical investigators require high-quality data for analyses; therefore, they should not accept inherently inaccurate, unsystematic and biased data derived from death certificates and medical records. Even when records are properly filled out, determination of cause of death can be very difficult, particularly among elderly patients with multiple diseases. Rather, clinical investigators should rely on all-cause death as an objective, unbiased end point that is of primary interest to everyone in the general public and, similarly, should be of primary interest to medical professionals as well.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Raggi, M. C. Gongora, A. Gopal, T. Q. Callister, M. Budoff, and L. J. Shaw Coronary artery calcium to predict all-cause mortality in elderly men and women. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2008; 52(1): 17 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Kertai, C. M. Westerhout, K. S. Varga, G. Acsady, and J. Gal Dihydropiridine calcium-channel blockers and perioperative mortality in aortic aneurysm surgery Br. J. Anaesth., June 12, 2008; (2008) aen173v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hachamovitch and M. F. Di Carli Methods and Limitations of Assessing New Noninvasive Tests: Part II: Outcomes-Based Validation and Reliability Assessment of Noninvasive Testing Circulation, May 27, 2008; 117(21): 2793 - 2801. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kohsaka, S. Mohan, S. Virani, V.-V. Lee, A. Contreras, G. J. Reul, and S. A. Coulter Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects long-term survival after mechanical valve replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2008; 135(5): 1076 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S M Holloway, D E Wilcox, A Wilcox, J C S Dean, J N Berg, D R Goudie, M A Denvir, and M E M Porteous Life expectancy and death from cardiomyopathy amongst carriers of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy in Scotland Heart, May 1, 2008; 94(5): 633 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-W. Park, S.-C. Yun, S.-W. Lee, Y.-H. Kim, C. W. Lee, M.-K. Hong, J.-J. Kim, S. J. Choo, H. Song, C. H. Chung, et al. Long-Term Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, April 22, 2008; 117(16): 2079 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Kamdar, T. A. Meadows, E. E. Roselli, E. Z. Gorodeski, R. J. Curtin, J. F. Sabik, P. Schoenhagen, R. D. White, B. W. Lytle, S. D. Flamm, et al. Multidetector Computed Tomographic Angiography in Planning of Reoperative Cardiothoracic Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 85(4): 1239 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Nelson, P. C. Lambert, I. B. Squire, and D. R. Jones Relative survival: what can cardiovascular disease learn from cancer? Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2008; 29(7): 941 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Rigo, R. Sicari, S. Gherardi, A. Djordjevic-Dikic, L. Cortigiani, and E. Picano The additive prognostic value of wall motion abnormalities and coronary flow reserve during dipyridamole stress echo Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2008; 29(1): 79 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Lauer, C. E. Pothier, D. J. Magid, S. S. Smith, and M. W. Kattan An Externally Validated Model for Predicting Long-Term Survival after Exercise Treadmill Testing in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease and a Normal Electrocardiogram Ann Intern Med, December 18, 2007; 147(12): 821 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S.H. Kim, H. Ishwaran, E. Blackstone, and M. S. Lauer External Prognostic Validations and Comparisons of Age- and Gender-Adjusted Exercise Capacity Predictions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 6, 2007; 50(19): 1867 - 1875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bangalore, S. Sawhney, and F. H. Messerli Siesta, All-Cause Mortality, and Cardiovascular Mortality: Is there a "Siesta" at Adjudicating Cardiovascular Mortality? Arch Intern Med, October 22, 2007; 167(19): 2143 - 2143. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Cortigiani, F. Rigo, S. Gherardi, R. Sicari, M. Galderisi, F. Bovenzi, and E. Picano Additional Prognostic Value of Coronary Flow Reserve in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients With Negative Dipyridamole Stress Echocardiography by Wall Motion Criteria J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2007; 50(14): 1354 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Colivicchi, A. Bassi, M. Santini, and C. Caltagirone Discontinuation of Statin Therapy and Clinical Outcome After Ischemic Stroke Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): 2652 - 2657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Min, L. J. Shaw, R. B. Devereux, P. M. Okin, J. W. Weinsaft, D. J. Russo, N. J. Lippolis, D. S. Berman, and T. Q. Callister Prognostic Value of Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Prediction of All-Cause Mortality J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2007; 50(12): 1161 - 1170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nasir, L. J. Shaw, S. T. Liu, S. R. Weinstein, T. R. Mosler, P. R. Flores, F. R. Flores, P. Raggi, D. S. Berman, R. S. Blumenthal, et al. Ethnic Differences in the Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcification for All-Cause Mortality J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2007; 50(10): 953 - 960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W.A. van Geldorp, W.R. E. Jamieson, A. P. Kappetein, J. P.A. Puvimanasinghe, M. J.C. Eijkemans, G. L. Grunkemeier, J. J.M. Takkenberg, and A. J.J.C. Bogers Usefulness of microsimulation to translate valve performance into patient outcome: Patient prognosis after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier Edwards supra-annular valve J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2007; 134(3): 702 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Lauer, D. Martino, H. Ishwaran, and E. H. Blackstone Quantitative Measures of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass, Conduction, and Repolarization, and Long-Term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Circulation, August 21, 2007; 116(8): 888 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Murthy, A. C. Arroliga, P. A. Walts, J. Feng, J.-P. Yared, B. W. Lytle, and E. H. Blackstone Ventilatory dependency after cardiovascular surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 484 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Budoff, L. J. Shaw, S. T. Liu, S. R. Weinstein, T. P. Mosler, P. H. Tseng, F. R. Flores, T. Q. Callister, P. Raggi, and D. S. Berman Long-Term Prognosis Associated With Coronary Calcification: Observations From a Registry of 25,253 Patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 8, 2007; 49(18): 1860 - 1870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rudolf COPD and death: what exactly is the relationship? Thorax, May 1, 2007; 62(5): 378 - 379. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. P McGarvey, M. John, J. A Anderson, M. Zvarich, and R. A Wise Ascertainment of cause-specific mortality in COPD: operations of the TORCH Clinical Endpoint Committee Thorax, May 1, 2007; 62(5): 411 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. Tleyjeh, H. M.K. Ghomrawi, J. M. Steckelberg, T. L. Hoskin, Z. Mirzoyev, N. S. Anavekar, F. Enders, S. Moustafa, F. Mookadam, W. C. Huskins, et al. The Impact of Valve Surgery on 6-Month Mortality in Left-Sided Infective Endocarditis Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): 1721 - 1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Magne, P. Mathieu, J. G. Dumesnil, D. Tanne, F. Dagenais, D. Doyle, and P. Pibarot Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Survival After Mitral Valve Replacement Circulation, March 20, 2007; 115(11): 1417 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Ingul, E. Rozis, S. A. Slordahl, and T. H. Marwick Incremental Value of Strain Rate Imaging to Wall Motion Analysis for Prediction of Outcome in Patients Undergoing Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1252 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Lauer, S. C. Murthy, E. H. Blackstone, I. C. Okereke, and T. W. Rice [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake by Positron Emission Tomography for Diagnosis of Suspected Lung Cancer: Impact of Verification Bias Arch Intern Med, January 22, 2007; 167(2): 161 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Croal, G. S. Hillis, P. H. Gibson, M. T. Fazal, H. El-Shafei, G. Gibson, R. R. Jeffrey, K. G. Buchan, D. West, and B. H. Cuthbertson Relationship Between Postoperative Cardiac Troponin I Levels and Outcome of Cardiac Surgery Circulation, October 3, 2006; 114(14): 1468 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Elesber, C. A. Conover, A. E. Denktas, R. J. Lennon, D. R. Holmes Jr, M. T. Overgaard, M. Christiansen, C. Oxvig, L. O. Lerman, and A. Lerman Prognostic value of circulating pregnancy-associated plasma protein levels in patients with chronic stable angina Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2006; 27(14): 1678 - 1684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Shaw, P. Raggi, T. Q. Callister, and D. S. Berman Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in asymptomatic smokers and non-smokers Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2006; 27(8): 968 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Nilsson, P. Hedberg, T. Jonasson, I. Lonnberg, and J. Ohrvik QTc interval and survival in 75-year-old men and women from the general population. Europace, April 1, 2006; 8(4): 233 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Chaowalit, A. L. Arruda, R. B. McCully, K. R. Bailey, and P. A. Pellikka Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Enhanced Prognostic Prediction Using a Simple Risk Score J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 7, 2006; 47(5): 1029 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Hillis, B. L. Croal, K. G. Buchan, H. El-Shafei, G. Gibson, R. R. Jeffrey, C. G.M. Millar, G. J. Prescott, and B. H. Cuthbertson Renal Function and Outcome From Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Impact on Mortality After a 2.3-Year Follow-Up Circulation, February 28, 2006; 113(8): 1056 - 1062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Shishehbor, D. Litaker, C. E. Pothier, and M. S. Lauer Association of Socioeconomic Status With Functional Capacity, Heart Rate Recovery, and All-Cause Mortality JAMA, February 15, 2006; 295(7): 784 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Cortigiani, R. Bigi, R. Sicari, P. Landi, F. Bovenzi, and E. Picano Prognostic Value of Pharmacological Stress Echocardiography in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3): 605 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Brener, B. W. Lytle, I. P. Casserly, S. G. Ellis, E. J. Topol, and M. S. Lauer Predictors of revascularization method and long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention or repeat coronary bypass surgery in patients with multivessel coronary disease and previous coronary bypass surgery Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2006; 27(4): 413 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mohty-Echahidi, J. F. Malouf, S. E. Girard, H. V. Schaff, D. E. Grill, M. E. Enriquez-Sarano, and F. A. Miller Jr Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Long-Term Survival in Patients With Small St Jude Medical Mechanical Prostheses in the Aortic Position Circulation, January 24, 2006; 113(3): 420 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Tarakji, R. Brunken, P. M. McCarthy, M. O. Al-Chekakie, A. Abdel-Latif, C. E. Pothier, E. H. Blackstone, and M. S. Lauer Myocardial Viability Testing and the Effect of Early Intervention in Patients With Advanced Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Circulation, January 17, 2006; 113(2): 230 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Elhendy, A. Huurman, A. F.L. Schinkel, J. J. Bax, R. T. van Domburg, R. Valkema, E. Biagini, and D. Poldermans Association of Ischemia on Stress99mTc-Tetrofosmin Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 1589 - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Colivicchi, A. Bassi, M. Santini, and C. Caltagirone Prognostic Implications of Right-Sided Insular Damage, Cardiac Autonomic Derangement, and Arrhythmias After Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, August 1, 2005; 36(8): 1710 - 1715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. O. O'Neill, J. B. Young, C. E. Pothier, and M. S. Lauer Peak Oxygen Consumption as a Predictor of Death in Patients With Heart Failure Receiving {beta}-Blockers Circulation, May 10, 2005; 111(18): 2313 - 2318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Kertai, E. Boersma, J. Klein, H. van Urk, and D. Poldermans Optimizing the Prediction of Perioperative Mortality in Vascular Surgery by Using a Customized Probability Model Arch Intern Med, April 25, 2005; 165(8): 898 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Heckbert, C. Kooperberg, M. M. Safford, B. M. Psaty, J. Hsia, A. McTiernan, J. M. Gaziano, W. H. Frishman, and J. D. Curb Comparison of Self-Report, Hospital Discharge Codes, and Adjudication of Cardiovascular Events in the Women's Health Initiative Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2004; 160(12): 1152 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Horne, N. J. Camp, J. B. Muhlestein, and L. A. Cannon-Albright Evidence for a Heritable Component in Death Resulting From Aortic and Mitral Valve Diseases Circulation, November 9, 2004; 110(19): 3143 - 3148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Aktas, V. Ozduran, C. E. Pothier, R. Lang, and M. S. Lauer Global Risk Scores and Exercise Testing for Predicting All-Cause Mortality in a Preventive Medicine Program JAMA, September 22, 2004; 292(12): 1462 - 1468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. O. O'Neill, J. B. Young, C. E. Pothier, and M. S. Lauer Severe frequent ventricular ectopy after exercise as a predictor of death in patients with heart failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 18, 2004; 44(4): 820 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Brener, B. W. Lytle, I. P. Casserly, J. P. Schneider, E. J. Topol, and M. S. Lauer Propensity Analysis of Long-Term Survival After Surgical or Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease and High-Risk Features Circulation, May 18, 2004; 109(19): 2290 - 2295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Raggi, L. J. Shaw, D. S. Berman, and T. Q. Callister Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in subjects with and without diabetes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2004; 43(9): 1663 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Quader, P. M. McCarthy, A. M. Gillinov, J. M. Alster, D. M. Cosgrove III, B. W. Lytle, and E. H. Blackstone Does preoperative atrial fibrillation reduce survival after coronary artery bypass grafting? Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2004; 77(5): 1514 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yamazaki, J. Myers, and V. F. Froelicher Effect of Age and End Point on the Prognostic Value of the Exercise Test Chest, May 1, 2004; 125(5): 1920 - 1928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|