JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 34:70-82
© 1999 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, S.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Long-term (three-year) prognosis of patients treated with reperfusion or conservatively after acute myocardial infarction

Shmuel Gottlieb, MD* {dagger}, Valentina Boyko, MSc*, David Harpaz, MD*, Hanoch Hod, MD, FACC*, Miriam Cohen, BSc*, Lori Mandelzweig, MPH*, Zahi Khoury, MD{dagger}, Shlomo Stern, MD, FACC{dagger}, Solomon Behar, MD* for the Israeli Thrombolytic Survey Group

* Neufeld Cardiac Research Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
{dagger} Heiden Department of Cardiology, Bikur Cholim Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. A complete list of the study participants appears in J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1506–13

Manuscript received February 11, 1999; accepted March 19, 1999.

Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Shmuel Gottlieb, Neufeld Cardiac Research Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 52621 Israel
SGOTT{at}MD2.HUJI.AC.IL


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OBJECTIVES

This survey sought to assess the frequency of the use of thrombolytic therapy, invasive coronary procedures (ICP) (angiography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]), variables associated with their use, and their impact on early (30-day) and long-term (3-year) mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Few data are available regarding the implementation in daily practice of the results of clinical trials of treatments for AMI and their impact on early and long-term prognosis in unselected patients after AMI.

METHODS

A prospective community-based national survey was conducted during January–February 1994 in all 25 coronary care units operating in Israel.

RESULTS

Among 999 consecutive patients with an AMI (72% men; mean age 63 ± 12 years) acute reperfusion therapy (ART) was used in 455 patients (46%; thrombolysis in 435 patients [44%] and primary angioplasty in 20 [2%]). Its use was independently associated with anterior AMI location and hospitals with on-site angioplasty facilities, whereas advancing age, prior myocardial infarction (MI) and prior angioplasty or CABG were independently associated with its lower use. The three-year mortality of patients treated with ART was lower than in counterpart patients (22.0% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.0008), mainly as the result of 30-day to 3-year outcome (12.4% vs. 21.1%; hazard ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52 to 1.03). Independent predictors of long-term mortality were: age, heart failure on admission or during the hospitalization, ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation and diabetes. The outcome of patients not treated with ART differed according to the reason for the exclusion, where patients with contraindications experienced the highest three-year (50%) mortality rate. After ART, coronary angiography, angioplasty and CABG were performed in-hospital in 28%, 12% and 5% of patients, respectively. Their use was independently associated with recurrent infarction or ischemia, on-site catheterization or CABG facilities, non–Q-wave AMI and anterior infarct location. In the entire study population, and in patients with a non–Q-wave AMI, performance of ICP was associated with lower 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.53, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.98, and OR = 0.21, 0.03 to 0.84, respectively), but not thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey demonstrates the extent of implementation in daily practice of ART and ICP and their impact on early and long-term prognosis in an unselected population after AMI.

Abbreviations and Acronyms
  AMI = acute myocardial infarction
  ART = acute reperfusion therapy
  CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting
  CCU = coronary care unit
  CI = confidence interval
  ECG = electrocardiogram
  HR = hazard ratio
  ICP = invasive coronary procedures
  MI = myocardial infarction
  NQWMI = non–Q-wave myocardial infarction
  OR = odds ratio
  TIMI = Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction
  tPA = tissue-type plasminogen activator

Several large-scale randomized clinical trials in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have demonstrated that thrombolytic therapy reduces mortality early after AMI (1). However, these studies failed to demonstrate an extra benefit after hospital discharge (2). Other randomized studies evaluating the physiologic effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy demonstrated extended long-term mortality benefit of early successful complete reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 3 flow) (3,4), which may be related to improved left ventricular function at the time of hospital discharge (3–5). Recently, several moderate-sized randomized studies have reported that primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy may improve prognosis after AMI (6).

Although randomized trials are the preferred method for assessing therapeutic modalities, useful information can also be gained from prospective registry data which demonstrate to what extent therapeutic measures like acute reperfusion therapy (ART) (thrombolysis or primary angioplasty) and invasive coronary procedures (ICP) (angiography, nonprimary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) were implemented in daily practice in unselected AMI patients hospitalized in coronary care units (CCUs). Such an assessment on a national basis has seldomly been conducted (7–10).

The purpose of the present study was to determine the clinical practice pattern of the use of thrombolysis, ICP and medical management of unselected patients with AMI, in a prospective, observational national survey conducted in all CCUs in Israel, in 1994, and their impact on in-hospital complications and short- (30-day) and long-term (three-year) prognosis.


   Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient population.   A nationwide prospective survey was performed during a two-month period (January and February 1994) in all 25 CCUs operating in Israel, as described elsewhere (11). In brief, demographic, historical and clinical data including in-hospital complications, medical management and procedures performed were collected on specific forms for all participants by dedicated study physicians in the CCUs. The diagnosis of AMI was based on clinical, electrocardiographic and enzymatic findings. Eligibility for inclusion in the survey was validated before discharge from the CCU. Thrombolytic therapy was used at the discretion of each center. Reasons for not utilizing thrombolytic therapy were recorded. In patients with more than one reason for exclusion from thrombolytic therapy, one reason was selected after completion of the survey on the basis of the following scale of priority: 1) contraindication to thrombolysis; 2) unqualifying electrocardiogram (ECG); 3) late arrival; and 4) other reasons (i.e., advanced age, nonspecific symptoms, death before decision was taken and spontaneous reperfusion). There were no uniform guidelines for the use of coronary arteriography, angioplasty or CABG, but most of the centers used a "conservative strategy" of "watchful waiting" with coronary arteriography followed by coronary mechanical reperfusion (12). On-site catheterization and CABG facilities were available in 19 and 11 of the centers, respectively.

Thirty-day and three-year mortality rates were assessed for all patients participating in the survey from hospital charts and by matching the identification numbers of the patients with the Israeli National Population Register.

Statistical analysis.   All analyses were performed using SAS (Cary, North Carolina) statistical software. Chi-square and t tests were used to determine the significance of the differences between proportions and mean values, respectively. Results of continuous variables are reported as mean ± 1 SD. The nonparametric Wilcoxon test was used to compare the time from pain onset to thrombolytic therapy in the different groups. Two-sided p values are reported.

Stepwise logistic regression analyses (SAS LOGISTIC Procedure) were performed to assess potential variables associated with the use of ART (thrombolysis or primary angioplasty) and ICP (angiography, nonprimary angioplasty and CABG) during the hospitalization period.

Survival curves were estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method. The significance of the difference between the survival curves was assessed by the log-rank test (SAS LIFETEST Procedure).

Primary risk models were constructed to determine variables independently associated with mortality. Gender and ART were added to the best model selected if they were not significant, in order to determine their prognostic significance. For 30-day mortality a stepwise logistic regression analysis (SAS LOGISTIC Procedure) was used, and for three-year mortality in 30-day survivors and cumulative three-year mortality, Cox proportional-hazard regression models (SAS PHREG Procedure) were used. In all stepwise procedures, a variable was allowed to entered into the model if it made a significant contribution at the 0.15 level, and was removed if after subsequent addition of other variables, it no longer made a contribution at the 0.10 level.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Patients’ characteristics.   During the survey period, 999 patients (721 men, 72%, mean age 63.4 ± 12.2 years) were hospitalized for AMI. Of them 455 patients (46%) received ART (thrombolysis 435 patients [44%] and primary angioplasty 20 patients [2%]) and 544 patients did not. The baseline characteristics of both groups are presented in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of Patients Treated or Not Treated by Acute Reperfusion (Thrombolysis or Primary Angioplasty)

 
Acute reperfusion therapy.   Thrombolysis
Thrombolytic therapy was used in 435 patients. Streptokinase was the most common thrombolytic agent used (85%); tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) or other thrombolytic agents were used in 4% and 11%, respectively. In-hospital thrombolytic therapy was started in the CCU setting in 79% of the cases, in the emergency room in 16% and in other departments in 4%. In only 1.5% of the cases prehospital thrombolytic therapy was initiated in the mobile CCU setting. The median time from pain onset to thrombolysis (reported for 83% of thrombolysed patients [n = 361]) was 2.5 h (mean 3.1 ± 2.2 h). This time distribution was <1.5 h: 22% of the patients; 1.5 to 3 h: 46%; 3.5 to 6 h: 27%; and >6 h: 5% of the patients. This time interval was slightly longer in women than in men (median time 3.0 vs. 2.5 h, respectively, p = 0.17), and with advancing age (median time for age <55 years: 2 h; 55 to 64 years: 2.5 h; 65 to 74 years: 3 h; and for age >75 years: 3 h; p = 0.14).

Primary angioplasty
Primary angioplasty was performed in 20 patients (2%), in 10 of the 19 centers with catheterization facilities; 12 cases were performed in three centers, and the other eight cases in seven centers. The main reason for performing primary angioplasty was contraindication to thrombolysis (eight patients, 40%). The patients’ baseline characteristics, including Killip class on admission (class I, 14 patients [70%]), were similar to those of patients who underwent thrombolysis. None of these patients had a subsequent angioplasty or CABG during the hospitalization course.

During the survey period, 544 patients (54%; 52% of men and 61% of women, p = 0.008) were excluded from ART. Of them, 474 patients (87%) had only one reason for exclusion, and 70 patients (13%) had ≥2 reasons. The main reason for exclusion from ART was unqualifying ECG (234 patients [23%]). Other reasons were: late arrival (129 patients [13%]), contraindication (114 patients [11%]) and other reasons (67 patients [7%]). There was no difference in the proportion of these reasons between men and women.

Variables associated with acute reperfusion therapy use.   The proportion of patients treated with ART declined significantly with advancing age (age <55 years: 54%; 55 to 64: 53%; 65 to 74: 39%, and ≥75 years old: 34%; p for trend <0.0001; Table 2). Women were treated with ART less frequently than men (39% vs. 48%, respectively, p = 0.008). However, the difference was of borderline statistical significance after multivariate adjustment (Table 2). Prior angioplasty or CABG were independently associated with lower use of ART, whereas anterior infarct location and hospitalization in a center with on-site catheterization facilities were associated with its increased use (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2 Variables Associated With the Use of Acute Reperfusion, Coronary Angiography, Angioplasty and CABG

 
Invasive coronary procedures during the index hospitalization.   Coronary angiography
After ART, subsequent in-hospital coronary angiography (not including 20 patients with primary angioplasty) was performed in 271/979 patients (28%). Of them 164 patients (61%) underwent angioplasty or CABG during the index hospitalization (Table 3). Coronary arteriography use was irrespective of whether the patients received thrombolysis or not (Tables 2 and 3). Its use significantly declined with advancing age (age <55 years: 38%; 55 to 64: 27%; 65 to 74: 25%, and ≥75 years old: 11%; p for trend <0.0001; Table 2), and was lower in women than in men (21% vs. 28%, respectively, p < 0.0001). However, after multivariate adjustment the lower use of coronary angiography in women was not of statistical significance (Table 2). Recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) or recurrent ischemia, hospitalization in centers with catheterization facilities, anterior infarct location and non–Q-wave MI (NQWMI) were independently associated with the use of coronary arteriography, whereas Killip class ≥II on admission, a history of cerebrovascular event and diabetes were associated with its lower use (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3 In-Hospital Invasive Coronary Procedures, Medications, Complications and Mortality of Patients Treated or Not Treated by Acute Reperfusion

 
Angioplasty
After ART, subsequent angioplasty (not including 20 patients with primary angioplasty) was performed in 118/979 patients (12%). It was performed more frequently in patients initially treated with thrombolysis (15% vs. 9%, p = 0.004; Table 3). However, after adjustment, performance of angioplasty during the index hospitalization was not associated with thrombolysis use (Table 2). Other variables associated with the use of angioplasty are presented in Table 2.

Coronary artery bypass grafting
The use of CABG during the index hospitalization was low in this survey (46 patients, 5%). Its use was similar in patients treated with ART and in their counterparts (Table 3). On-site CABG operation facilities, recurrent MI or recurrent ischemia and NQWMI were independently associated with increased use of CABG operation (Table 2).

In-hospital medications.   Patients treated with ART more frequently received heparin, aspirin and beta-adrenergic blocking agents, and less frequently received diuretics and digitalis, as compared with their counterparts (Table 3). The use of other medication was similar in both groups.

In-hospital complications.   Patients treated with ART more frequently experienced ventricular tachycardia (all types) or fibrillation, bleeding complications and recurrent infarction, and less frequently experienced paroxysmal atrial flutter/fibrillation and congestive heart failure than their counterparts (Table 3).

Mortality.   The 30-day, 30-day to 3-year and 3-year cumulative mortality rates for the patients who participated in the survey were: 12.1%, 17.1% and 27.1%, respectively. Mortality increased significantly with advancing age (Fig. 1, Table 4). Women fared worse than men, with higher 30-day (23.7% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.009) and 30-day to 3-year crude mortality rates (36.0% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.015). However, after adjustment, the odds ratio for death in women as compared with men was of borderline significance at 30 days, but not thereafter (Table 4). Other variables independently associated with increased mortality are presented in Table 4. Use of ICP was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.53), but not thereafter. Hospitalization in centers with on-site catheterization facilities was not associated with lower mortality.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1 Thirty-day and three-year crude mortality rates by age subgroups (p for trend <0.0001, for both 30-day mortality and incremental three-year mortality rates).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4 Multivariate Stepwise Logistic Regression Analyses to Predict 30-Day, 30-Day to Three-Year and Three-Year Cumulative Mortality

 
The 30-day, 30-day to three-year and three-year crude mortality rates were lower in patients treated with ART as compared with counterpart patients, but reached statistical significance only after 30 days (Table 3, Fig. 2). After multivariate adjustment (Table 4), patients receiving ART had a similar 30-day mortality as their counterparts (OR 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 1.54), but a lower mortality thereafter with a difference that amplified after 30 days through 3 years (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.03).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2 Three-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival curves for patients who underwent acute reperfusion and those who did not; differences were assessed by log-rank test; p = 0.0007.

 
The outcome of patients excluded from ART (i.e., contraindication, unqualifying ECG, late arrival and other reasons) differed according to the reason for exclusion (Table 5, Fig. 3). Patients excluded from ART (mainly thrombolysis) because of contraindications (n = 114) had the highest 30-day (OR 1.78) and three-year mortality rates (HR 1.71). In patients excluded from ART because of late arrival (n = 129) or other reasons (n = 67), the 30-day and the three-year mortality rates did not differ significantly from patients treated with ART. On the other hand, patients with an unqualifying ECG (n = 234) had a lower 30-day mortality rate (OR 0.47), but an increased 30-day to three-year mortality (HR 1.50) as compared with patients who underwent ART. In this latter group, 153/234 patients (65%) had a NQWMI.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 5 Crude and Adjusted Mortality Rates of Patients Treated or Not Treated by Acute Reperfusion by Reason for Exclusion

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3 Three-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival curves for patients who underwent acute reperfusion and those who did not by reason of exclusion (contraindication, unqualifying electrocardiogram [ECG], late arrival and other reasons).

 
Non–Q-Wave infarction.   A NQWMI was noted in 356 patients. The baseline characteristics, management and in-hospital complications of NQWMI patients treated with an early ICP (n = 124) or conservatively (n = 232) are presented in Table 6. Patients treated with ICP were younger, and had anterior infarct location more often and a better Killip class on admission. Other baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. The ICP group patients were treated with thrombolysis, heparin, aspirin, nitrates and beta-blockers more often, and with digitalis and diuretics less often. The ICP group experienced recurrent AMI or ischemia more often (fourfold) than their counterpart group. The prognosis of NQWMI patients treated or not with ICP differed (Table 6, Fig. 4). The 30-day (1.6% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.004), 30-day to 3-year (15.6% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.07) and cumulative three-year crude mortality rates (16.9% vs. 31.5%, p = 0.003) were lower in the former. However, after adjustment for age, gender, history of diabetes, angina, prior MI, anterior infarct location, congestive heart failure on admission (Killip class ≥II) or during the hospitalization course, ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, ART and hospitalization in a center with on-site coronary catheterization facilities, performance of early ICP in patients with NQWMI was associated with lower 30-day mortality (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.84), but not thereafter from 30 days to 3 years (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.15). Hospitalization in a center with on-site coronary catheterization facilities was not associated with early (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.37 to 2.94) or long-term outcome (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.15).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 6 Baseline Characteristics, Management, Complications and Mortality of 356 Patients with Non–Q-wave MI Treated or Not Treated by Invasive Coronary Procedures

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4 Three-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival curves for patients with non–Q-wave acute myocardial infarction who underwent invasive coronary procedures (angiography, angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting, not including primary angioplasty) and those who did not; p = 0.002, by log-rank test.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
In the present survey, reflecting the clinical practice of the medical community at large in an unselected AMI population hospitalized in all CCUs operating in Israel, in 1994, half of the patients received ART (mainly thrombolysis). Acute reperfusion therapy was associated with decreased three-year mortality (22.0% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.0008), mainly as the result of 30-day to three-year outcome (12.4% vs. 21.1%; HR 0.73). Patients excluded from ART because of contraindication carried the worst prognosis (twofold risk as compared with patients treated with ART). After ART, subsequent use of ICP during the index hospitalization course was relatively low (28%), reflecting the "conservative strategy" of "watchful waiting" with coronary arteriography (12). Variables independently associated with ICP use were recurrent infarction or ischemia, on-site catheterization or CABG facilities, NQWMI and anterior infarct location. Performance of ICP was associated with lower 30-day mortality in the entire study population (OR 0.53) and in patients with a NQWMI (OR 0.21), but not thereafter.

Thrombolytic therapy.   In this community-based nationwide survey 44% of patients received thrombolytic therapy according to the discretion of each center. Similar rates of thrombolysis use were reported from Canada (13) and New Zealand (14). Higher rates were reported in Germany (52%) (9), in the United Kingdom (72%) among patients with final diagnosis of definite AMI (15) and in selected patients eligible for participation in randomized trials, such as those studied in the GISSI-3 (16) and the ISIS-4 (17) trials ({approx}70%) carried out in Europe. A lower rate of thrombolysis use (32%) was recently reported by the French AMI Survey in 1995 (10) and from 11 countries in Europe, in 1993–1994 (36%; ranging from 13% to 52%) (18). In the U.S. as compared with Europe, lower figures (23% to 35%) have been recorded (7,8,19–22).

In the current survey streptokinase was the most common thrombolytic agent used (85%), similar to other places in Europe (9,17,18) and dissimilar to the U.S. practice, where the most common thrombolytic agent used is tPA ({approx}70%) (7,21). This practice relates to the lower cost of streptokinase as compared with tPA, and the use of the latter in selected cases where its benefit was proven, that is, nonelderly patients presenting within 3 h from symptoms onset with anterior AMI (23).

The median time from symptom onset to thrombolysis was 2.5 h in this survey, slightly shorter than in other reports (7,9,12). Elderly and female patients received thrombolytic therapy later than their counterparts, similar to other reports (7,12,24). Thrombolysis was initiated in most cases in the hospital CCU (79%), in 16% in the emergency room and prehospital (mobile CCU) in only 1.5%. This low prehospital thrombolysis utilization rate is in accordance with reports from Europe (2.5%) (18), and in discordance with reports from the U.S. (7,21), and may be explained, in part, by the fact that most urban places in Israel are located at a reasonable distance from the nearby hospital and have a mobile CCU service. Thus, because of the rapidity of transportation, the direct transfer of many patients from the mobile CCU to in-hospital CCU, and the preference of cardiologists to initiate thrombolytic therapy in a hospital CCU setting, in most of the cases thrombolytic therapy was initiated in a hospital CCU.

Primary angioplasty.   Primary angioplasty represents an alternative method for myocardial reperfusion (6). However, its use requires special facilities and a trained, experienced team of medical personnel. Fewer than 20% of hospitals in the U.S. and less than 10% of hospitals in Europe are able to meet these requirements (25). A similar situation exists in Israel, and despite the fact that 19 of the 25 CCUs have on-site catheterization facilities, primary angioplasty was rarely used (20 patients, 2%). A low rate of primary angioplasty use was also noted in a survey in Germany (1.4%) (9) and in the NRMI-1 (3.1%) (7) and NRMI-2 surveys (3.9%) (8) in the U.S., whereas a higher rate of use was noted in the MITI Registry (8.5%) (21) and the French AMI Survey (13%) (10).

Factors associated with the use of acute reperfusion.   In this survey, factors independently associated with the use of ART were anterior infarct location and on-site catheterization facilities. In patients with anterior infarction the risk of developing large infarction is greater than in counterpart AMI patients, hence there is a greater potential for myocardial salvage by either thrombolysis or primary angioplasty. This concurs with previous studies showing the greatest survival benefit with thrombolysis (1) or with primary angioplasty (6) in high risk patients, that is, anterior AMI. The independent association between use of ART and hospitalization in centers with on-site catheterization facilities (OR 1.75) indicates that in these centers as compared with centers without such facilities, a more aggressive reperfusion strategy with either thrombolysis (47% vs. 34%, respectively, p < 0.001) or primary angioplasty (2.6% vs. 0.4%, respectively, p = 0.03) is in use. This finding is in accordance with the GISSI-3 trial (26) and in discordance with the MITI Registry (20).

On the other hand, advanced age, prior infarction and prior angioplasty or CABG were independently associated with lower use of ART, whereas female gender had a borderline association. The independent association between advanced age and lower use of ART (mainly thrombolysis) is in accordance with other studies (7,8,19,20,26,27). The progressive rise in the incidence of major hemorrhagic complications with increasing age formed the rationale for excluding patients aged ≥75 years from early thrombolytic trials (28). However, since ART by either primary angioplasty or thrombolysis is more efficacious in the elderly (1,29–31), its use should be advocated in elderly patients with AMI as well, unless specific contraindications are present.

The independent association between prior infarction and the lower use of ART may be explained, by the fact that in these patients the recognition of new infarction is more difficult. They often present with a non–ST-elevation AMI, and in about half of them the diagnosis of AMI is missed on admission (15). Among patients with prior CABG as compared with counterparts who did not undergo CABG, the lesion that produces infarction is more likely to be situated in a distal or branch vessel, and as a consequence infarct size determined by enzymatic assessment and ECG changes tends to be smaller, and may culminate in a NQWMI or even be obscured (32).

Women were treated with ART less frequently than men (39% vs. 48%, p = 0.008). This seemingly lower use of ART in women is related to their older age, other comorbid conditions and longer time interval from symptom onset to therapy, since after adjustment for age and other confounding variables this difference was of borderline statistical significance (OR 0.77, p = 0.11). Similar findings were noted in our earlier national AMI survey in 1992 (33), and in other studies (34,35), whereas in other studies the use of thrombolysis in women remained lower than in men even after adjustment (8,18,26,36).

Killip class ≥II on admission was not associated with the use of ART in this survey. In hemodynamically compromised patients, those with Killip class III on admission or with cardiogenic shock, emergent mechanical reperfusion by either angioplasty or CABG may be a more promising mode of reperfusion than thrombolysis (37). However, their use in our survey was low, and they were not exclusively performed in patients with shock. Among the 20 patients who underwent primary angioplasty, only one patient was in Killip class III on admission and two patients were in class IV. Two of these three patients (one in class III and one in class IV) died during the index hospitalization.

Determinants of the use of coronary angiography, angioplasty and CABG after acute reperfusion.   After ART, subsequent use of ICP during the index hospitalization was relatively low (coronary angiography was performed in 28%, angioplasty in 12% and CABG in 5% of the patients), reflecting the "conservative strategy" of "watchful waiting" with coronary arteriography (7). Markedly higher rates were reported in the U.S., where more "invasive strategy" is in use (7,20,22,38–41). Interestingly, the variables independently associated with the use of ICP in both strategies were quite similar, and included recurrent ischemia or reinfarction (20,40), presence of NQWMI and anterior infarct location (40) and hospitalization in centers with on-site catheterization or CABG facilities (20,22,40,42). This finding indicates the heterogeneity of the use of these procedures, which in some centers were used more liberally. On the other hand, in this survey and in other studies, advancing age (20,40), Killip class ≥II on admission (20) and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (40) were independently associated with lower use of ICP. In these patients, performance of ICP carries an increased procedural risk, even though potentially elderly patients and patients with heart failure may benefit more from such procedures as compared with low risk patients. Diabetes was associated with lower use of ICP in this survey but not in others (40,43). In contrast to other studies that noted an independent high use of ICP in patients treated with thrombolysis (7,20,44), this difference was not noted. Also we did not observe a lower use of ICP in women in the current survey, as well as in our previous survey in 1992 (32), in accordance with some (45) but discordant with others (8,20,36,46).

Mortality.   In accordance with previous reports, powerful independent predictors of early and long-term mortality after AMI were age (8,9,12,13,20,47,48), heart failure on admission or during the hospitalization course (8,9,12,13,47,48) and diabetes (8,47,49). Women fared worse than men, with higher early and long-term crude mortality rates. However, after adjustment for pertinent variables, the odds ratio for dying in women as compared with men was of borderline statistical significance at 30 days (OR 1.39; p = 0.15), but not thereafter, in accordance with other studies (47,50).

Acute reperfusion therapy was associated with a borderline early favorable prognosis (Fig. 2, Tables 3 and 4). Similar findings were noted in other AMI surveys as well (10,51) and in one randomized thrombolytic trial of streptokinase (52). In the French AMI Survey (10), five-day mortality was lower in patients reperfused by thrombolysis or primary angioplasty than in counterpart patients (8.2% vs. 5.6%); however, after multivariate adjustment this benefit disappeared. In the MITI Registry (51) in-hospital mortality was lower in patients treated with thrombolysis (6.7% vs. 10.7%), a difference that was no longer evident after age adjustment. In the ISAM study (52) 21-day mortality was similar in streptokinase-treated patients and in control subjects (5.2% vs. 6.5%, respectively). On the other hand, most thrombolytic-controlled trials found early survival benefit with thrombolytic therapy (1). This discrepancy may be related to the selection bias of favoring patients with low risk characteristics in thrombolytic randomized trials. This view is also supported by the fact that in the current survey the overall 30-day mortality rate of patients treated with ART was higher (11.0%) than that reported in placebo-controlled thrombolytic trials by the Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialist Collaborative Study Group for thrombolysed patients at 35 days (9.6%) (1). Another explanation for this early borderline beneficial effect may be related to the small sample size of our population, which lacked the power to detect small differences between patients treated or not with ART. In fact, in the current study, the relative reduction in 30-day mortality between patients treated or not with ART was 16% (11.0% vs. 13.1%, respectively). This reduction was similar to that observed by the Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialist Collaborative Study Group of 17% in thrombolysed versus nonthrombolysed patients (9.6% vs. 11.5%, respectively), which reached statistical significance because of a much larger sample size (n = 58,600). Indeed, it is claimed that in estimating the effect of treatment, power calculation suggests, that the thrombolysis effect in reducing overall mortality will not be detected until the population with AMI includes at least 20,000 patients (51).

Of interest is the fact that patients treated with ART had an extended mortality benefit as compared with counterpart patients that amplified after 30 days through 3 years (12.4% vs. 21.1%, respectively; HR 0.73; Tables 3 and 4, Fig. 4). Similar findings were recently published by the GUSTO angiographic substudy investigators (3). Patients who achieved normal (TIMI grade 3) flow in the infarct-related artery and early preservation of the left ventricular function had a significant survival advantage well beyond the 30 days through two years (3). On the other hand, our findings are in discordance with earlier placebo-controlled thrombolytic trials demonstrating no extra benefit after hospital discharge in thrombolysis-treated patients (2). This long-term survival benefit in our study may be related to the greater reduction of infarct size by earlier administration of thrombolytic therapy (53), the wider use in recent years of new therapeutic modalities including aspirin, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, better prevention of reocclusion and reinfarction, and revascularization procedures in selected cases, as compared with earlier placebo-controlled thrombolytic trials. Our data are not complete concerning all medical and mechanical therapies over the three-year period, but we have data concerning therapies during the index hospitalization. Patients treated with ART more often received aspirin, heparin and beta-blockers, medications associated with improved outcome, and less often received digitalis and diuretics, medications associated with worse outcome, as is also evident in a lower rate of the in-hospital complication of congestive heart failure. These findings suggest a better preserved left ventricular function in patients treated with ART, which culminated in a long-term survival benefit.

Patients not treated with ART (mainly thrombolysis) had a worse early and long-term outcome. However, the prognosis of these patients differed according to the reason for exclusion. Patients not treated with ART because of contraindication had the highest crude and adjusted early and long-term mortality rates (Table 5, Fig. 3). A similar finding was noted in our survey in 1992, among patients excluded from the GUSTO protocol because of contraindication (54). These patients may benefit from primary angioplasty (55).

Patients with unqualifying ECG had small infarctions of NQWMI type (67% of the patients), with a low early mortality rate (OR 0.47) increasing thereafter (HR 1.50) (Table 5), in accordance with cohorts in the prethrombolytic era (56,57). No survival advantage was noted in NQWMI patients when treated with ART (58). However, despite their smaller infarct size, they may experience higher rates of postinfarction ischemic events. Therefore, these patients may benefit from ICP when performed during the hospitalization course (59). This explains the higher (twofold) use of ICP in these patients as compared with counterparts with a Q-wave AMI (35% [124/356] vs. 23% [147/643], p = 0.003, Table 2). Moreover, the prognosis of NQWMI patients treated or not with ICP differed, and the early and 3-year crude mortality rates were lower in the former (Table 6, Fig. 4). However, after adjustment, performance of early ICP in patients with NQWMI was associated with lower 30-day mortality (OR 0.21), but not thereafter from 30 days to 3 years (HR 1.01). These results are in accordance with the VANQWISH study (60) and the TIMI IIIB (61) trial showing no benefit from an early routine "invasive approach" after NQWMI. Nevertheless, the early benefit of ICP indicates that when a "conservative strategy" guided by ischemia approach is adopted, early ICP in NQWMI patients is beneficial.

The outcome of patients excluded from ART because of late arrival or other reasons did not differ significantly from patients treated with ART. The former are older, and more likely to be women (54) with other unfavorable characteristics that may influence their outcome. In these patients the use of ART 12 to 24 h after symptom onset is of limited benefit (58).

In this survey the "conservative strategy" of "watchful waiting" with coronary arteriography followed by mechanical reperfusion was associated with a decrease in early mortality (OR 0.53), but not thereafter, indicating a greater benefit with ICP when performed early. On the other hand, the higher use of ICP in hospitals with on-site catheterization facilities was not translated into a better outcome, and mortality rates in hospitals with and without such facilities were similar, in accordance with reports from other registries (20,38,62,63) and randomized trials (39,40). These findings may be explained by the fact that in Israel high risk patients can be transferred within a reasonable time to a tertiary center for coronary arteriography and revascularization. However, rapid availability, timing of intervention and other logistic problems should be considered. Also, we assume that some patients, especially those who were hospitalized in centers without on-site catheterization facilities, underwent such procedures after discharge as was noted in a more recent survey of our group (64), thus minimizing the early advantage obtained with the use of ICP during the index hospitalization.

Study limitations.   The patients in this cohort were derived from a prospective nationwide survey performed during a two-month period in 1994. The decision whether to treat patients with ART and/or ICP was left to the discretion of the treating physician in each center, was not randomized and thus may have been influenced by differences in patients’ baseline characteristics and physician bias, thus resulting in the selection of less severely ill patients. Despite multiple adjustment, we cannot conclude firmly that differences in prognosis in this study were due mainly to different treatment strategies, although their impact on prognosis seems very plausible. Despite these limitations, this study is based on an unselected population, and provides information on how the recommendations assessed from large randomized trials are implemented in daily clinical practice and their impact on early and long-term prognosis.

The present study includes data on in-hospital complications and long-term (3-year) mortality, but not morbidity data such as recurrent infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure and need for angioplasty or CABG after discharge. We cannot exclude the possibility that even though the mortality was lower in patients treated with ART, their postdischarge morbidity may not have differed from those who were not reperfused. It is also possible that some patients underwent ICP after discharge, especially in centers without such facilities, which may influence their subsequent outcome.

Conclusions and clinical implications.   This nationwide survey in unselected AMI patients hospitalized in CCUs demonstrates the extent of implementation in daily practice of ART and ICP proven to be effective in clinical trials, and their impact on short- and long-term prognosis after AMI. Acute reperfusion therapy (mainly thrombolysis), used in half of the patients, was associated with a trend for lower early mortality, but with significantly decreased long-term mortality, with a difference that amplified beyond the early postinfarction period, with an extended mortality benefit after 30 days through three years. The prognosis of patients not treated with ART differed according to the reason for exclusion, where patients with contraindication to ART carried the worst prognosis. Since the frequency of the use of thrombolytic therapy in this survey was quite high (44%), and could not be increased significantly, it seems reasonable that increase in the use of primary angioplasty, especially in patients with a contraindication to thrombolysis, may further reduce mortality of AMI patients. After ART, subsequent in-hospital use of ICP was relatively low as the result of the "conservative strategy" of "watchful waiting" with coronary arteriography followed by mechanical reperfusion, which was independently associated with a favorable early prognosis. Larger surveys and studies from different countries are needed to evaluate the outcome of patients treated with "conservative" or "invasive" strategy after AMI.


   Acknowledgments
 
We are indebted to all physicians and nurses who participated in the Israeli Thrombolytic Survey in 1994. We are grateful to Ms. Dalia Ben-David for the data collection, and to Mr. Mark Goldberg, for programming the database.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialist (FTT) Collaborative Study Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomized trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet. 1994;343:311–322[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Van de Werf F. Thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: why is there no extra benefit after hospital discharge? Circulation. 1995;91:2862–2864[Free Full Text]
  3. GUSTO-I Angiographic InvestigatorsRoss AM, Coyne KS, Moreyra E, et al. Extended mortality benefit of early postinfarction reperfusion. Circulation. 1998;97:1549–1556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. European Cooperative Study GroupLendernik T, Simoons ML, Van Es GA, Van de Werf F, Verstreate M, Arnold AER. Benefit of thrombolytic therapy is sustained throughout five years and is related to TIMI perfusion grade 3 but not grade 2 flow at discharge. Circulation. 1995;92:1110–1116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Simoons ML, Vos J, Tijssen JGP, et al. Long-term benefit of early thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: 5 year follow-up of trial conducted by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:1609–1615[Abstract]
  6. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study GroupGrines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:673–679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Participants in the National Registry of Myocardial InfarctionRogers WJ, Bowlby LJ, Chandra NC, et al. Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993). Observations from national registry of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1994;90:2103–2114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 InvestigatorsBarron HV, Bowlby LJ, Breen T, et al. Use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the United States. Data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Circulation. 1998;97:1150–1156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausarzte (ALKK)Rustige J, Schiele R, Burczyk U, et al. The 60 minutes myocardial infarction project. Treatment and clinical outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Germany. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:1438–1446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Danchin N, Vaur L, Genès N, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in the intensive care units in 1995: a national French survey of practice and early hospital results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1598–1605[Abstract]
  11. Israeli Thrombolytic Survey GroupGottlieb S, Boyko V, Zahger D, et al. Smoking and prognosis after acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era (Israeli thrombolytic national survey). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:106–113[Abstract]
  12. TIMI Study Group. Comparison of invasive and conservative strategies after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) phase II trial. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:618–627[Abstract]
  13. Rouleau JL, Talajic M, Sussex B, et al. Myocardial infarction patients in the 1990s—their risk factors, stratification and survival in Canada: the Canadian Assessment of Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1119–1127[Abstract]
  14. French JK, Williams BF, Hart HH, et al. Prospective evaluation of eligibility for thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Br Med J. 1996;312:1637–1641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Myocardial Infarction Audit GroupBirkhead JS. Thrombolytic treatment for myocardial infarction: an examination of practice in 39 United Kingdom hospitals. Heart. 1997;78:28–33[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio Della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto Miocardico. GISSI-3: effects of lisinopril and transdermal glyceryl trinitrate singly and together on 6-week mortality and ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1994;343:1115–1122[Medline]
  17. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. ISIS-4: a randomized factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1995;345:669–685[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. European Secondary Prevention Study Group. Translation of clinical trials into practice: a European population-based study of the use of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1996;437:1203–1207
  19. National Registry of Myocardial InfarctionGurwitz JH, Gore J, Goldberg RJ, Rubinson M, Chandra N, Rogers WJ. Recent age-related trends in the use of thrombolytic therapy in patients who have had acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:283–291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project InvestigatorsEvery NR, Larson EB, Litwin PE, et al. The association between on-site cardiac catheterization facilities and the use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:546–551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project InvestigatorsEvery NR, Parsons LS, Hlatky M, Martin JS, Weaver WD. A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1253–1260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Selby JV, Fireman BH, Lundstrom RJ, et al. Variation among hospitals in coronary-angiography practices and outcomes after myocardial infarction in a large health maintenance organization. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1888–1896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. GUSTO Investigators. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:673–682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. GUSTO-I InvestigatorsNewby LK, Rutsch WR, Callif RM, et al. Time from symptom onset to treatment and outcomes after thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1646–1655[Abstract]
  25. Lange RA, Hillis LD. Should thrombolysis or primary angioplasty be the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1311–1317[Free Full Text]
  26. GISSI-3 InvestigatorsMaggioni AP, Bobbio M, Malacrida R, Franzosi MG, Barlera S, Tognoni G. Factors influencing the non-administration of thrombolytic therapy in 17944 patients randomized to GISSI-3 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27(Suppl A):246A
  27. TIMI Project GroupWeaver WD, Litwin PE, Martin JS, et al. Effect of age on use of thrombolytic therapy and mortality in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:657–662[Abstract]
  28. Lew AS, Hod H, Cercek B, Shah PK, Ganz W. Mortality and morbidity rates of patients older and younger than 75 years with acute myocardial infarction treated with intravenous streptokinase. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:1–5[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Stone GW, Grines CL, Browne KF, et al. Predictors of in-hospital and 6-month outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:370–377[Abstract]
  30. SPRINT and the Israeli Thrombolytic Survey GroupGottlieb S, Goldbourt U, Boyko V, et al. Improved outcome of elderly patients (≥75 years of age) with acute myocardial infarction from 1981–1983 to 1992–1994 in Israel. Circulation. 1997;95:342–350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. SPRINT and the Israeli Thrombolytic Survey GroupGottlieb S, Goldbourt U, Barbash G, Behar S. Improvement in the prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction in the 1990s compared with the prethrombolytic era: an analysis by age subgroups. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 1995;4:17–31[Medline]
  32. Cream PA, Waters DD, Bosch X, Pelletier GB, Roy D, Theroux P. Angiographic findings after myocardial infarction in patients with previous bypass surgery: explanations for smaller infarcts in this group compared with control patients. Circulation. 1985;71:693–698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Israeli Thrombolytic Survey GroupBehar S, Gottlieb S, Hod H, et al. Influence of gender in the therapeutic management of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Israel. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:438–443[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Hannaford PHC, Kay CR, Ferry S. Agism as explanation for sexism in provision of thrombolysis. Br Med J. 1994;309:573[Free Full Text]
  35. Pagley PR, Yarzebski J, Goldberg R, et al. Gender differences in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A multihospital, community-based perspective. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:625–629[Abstract]
  36. Maynard C, Litwin PE, Martin JS, Weaver WD. Gender differences in the treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Results from the Myocardial Infarction and Intervention Registry. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:972–976[Abstract]
  37. SHOCK Registry InvestigatorsHochman JS, Boland J, Sleeper LA, et al. Current spectrum of cardiogenic shock and effect of early revascularization on mortality. Results of an international registry. Circulation. 1995;91:873–881[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Tu JV, Pashos CL, Naylor CD, et al. Use of cardiac procedures and outcomes in elderly patients with myocardial infarction in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1500–1505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. GUSTO InvestigatorsVan deWerf F, Topol EJ, Lee KL, et al. Variations in patients management and outcomes for acute myocardial infarction in the United States and other countries. Results from the GUSTO trial. JAMA. 1995;273:1586–1591[Abstract]
  40. Pilote L, Miller DP, Califf RM, Rau S, Weaver WD, Topol EJ. Determinants of the use of coronary angiography after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1198–1205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. SAVE InvestigatorsRouleau JL, Moye LA, Pfeffer MA, et al. A comparison of management patterns after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and United States. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:779–784[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Israeli Thrombolytic Survey GroupBehar S, Hod H, Benari B, et al. On-site catheterization laboratory and prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:813–817[Abstract]
  43. GUSTO-I InvestigatorsMak KH, Moliterno DJ, Granger CB, et al. Influence of diabetes mellitus on clinical outcome in the thrombolytic era of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:171–179[Abstract]
  44. SAVE InvestigatorsPfeffer MA, Moye LA, Braunwald E, et al. Selection bias in the use of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1991;266:528–532[Abstract]
  45. Krumholz HM, Douglas PS, Lauer MS, Pasternak RC. Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for gender bias? Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:785–790[Medline]
  46. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:221–225[Abstract]
  47. GUSTO-I InvestigatorsLee KL, Woodlief LH, Topol EJ, et al. Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. Results from an international trial of 41021 patients. Circulation. 1995;91:1659–1668[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio Della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI-2)Maggioni AP, Maseri A, Fresco C, et al. Age related increase in mortality among patients with first myocardial infarctions related with thrombolysis. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1442–1448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. MILIS Study GroupStone PH, Muller JE, Hartwell T, et al. The effect of diabetes mellitus on prognosis and serial left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction: contribution of both coronary disease and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction to the adverse prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:49–57[Abstract]
  50. Vaccarino V, Krumholz HM, Berkman LF, Horwitz RI. Sex differences in mortality after myocardial infarction. Is there evidence for an increased risk for women. Circulation. 1995;91:1861–1871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. MITI Project InvestigatorsMaynard C, Weaver WD, Litwin PE, et al. Hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction in the era of reperfusion therapy (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project). Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:877–882[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. ISAM Study Group. A prospective trial of intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (ISAM): mortality, morbidity, and infarct size at 21 days. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1465–1471[Abstract]
  53. GISSI InvestigatorsFranzosi MG, Santoro E, De Vita, et al. Ten-year follow-up of the first megatrial testing thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Results of the GISSI-1 study. Circulation. 1998;98:2659–2665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Israeli Thrombolytic Survey GroupBehar S, Gottlieb S, Hod H, et al. The outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction ineligible for thrombolytic therapy. Am J Med. 1996;101:184–191[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Himbert D, Juliard JM, Steg G, et al. Primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction with contraindication to thrombolysis. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:377–381[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Berger CJ, Murabito JM, Evans JC, Anderson KM, Levy D. Prognosis after first myocardial infarction. Comparison of Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction in the Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 1992;268:1545–1551[Abstract]
  57. Behar S, Haim M, Hod H, et al. Long-term prognosis of patients after a Q wave versus non-Q wave first acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:1532–1537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Ryan TJ, Anderson JL, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 1996;94:2341–2350[Free Full Text]
  59. Antman EM, Braunwald E. Acute myocardial infarction. Braunwald E. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1997. p. 1259
  60. Veterans Affairs Non-Q Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH)Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Crawford MH, et al. Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1785–1792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. TIMI IIIB InvestigatorsAnderson HV, Cannon CP, Stone PH, et al. One-year results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) IIIB clinical trail: a randomized comparison of tissue-type plasminogen activator versus placebo and early invasive versus early conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;89:1643–1650
  62. MITI InvestigatorsEvery N, Parsons LS, Fihn SD, et al. Long-term outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients admitted to hospitals with and without on-site cardiac catheterization facilities. Circulation. 1997;96:1770–1775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. RESCATE InvestigatorsMarrugat J, Sanz G, Masia R, et al. Six-month outcome in patients with myocardial infarction initially admitted to tertiary and nontertiary hospitals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1187–1192[Abstract]
  64. Israeli Thrombolytic Survey GroupBlondheim D, Gottlieb S, Behar S, Marmor A. Outcome of patients with post-infarction ischemia in hospitals with and without on-site cath labs (abstr). Eur Heart J. 1998;19(Suppl):600



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cardiovasc ResHome page
N. van Royen, J. J. Piek, I. Buschmann, I. Hoefer, M. Voskuil, and W. Schaper
Stimulation of arteriogenesis; a new concept for the treatment of arterial occlusive disease
Cardiovasc Res, February 16, 2001; 49(3): 543 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
J. M. Edelberg, S. H. Lee, M. Kaur, L. Tang, N. M. Feirt, S. McCabe, O. Bramwell, S. C. Wong, and M. K. Hong
Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-AB Limits the Extent of Myocardial Infarction in a Rat Model: Feasibility of Restoring Impaired Angiogenic Capacity in the Aging Heart
Circulation, February 5, 2002; 105(5): 608 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation