Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.



Figure 4 Effect of nicorandil on QT intervals. (Open circles) Eight patients with nicorandil-sensitive VT. (Crosses) Four patients with nicorandil-insensitive VT. In all 12 patients the RR intervals did not change after nicorandil (p = NS), although both the QT and QTc intervals were significantly reduced. A similar trend was also seen in the patients in whom nicorandil was effective (control vs. nicorandil: RR—515 ± 73 vs. 511 ± 67 ms, p = NS; QT—359 ± 50 vs. 339 ± 50 ms, p < 0.05; QTc—500 ± 46 vs. 474 ± 51, p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was seen in the three indexes in patients in whom nicorandil was not effective (control vs. nicorandil: RR—511 ± 76 vs. 545 ± 125 ms, p = NS; QT—328 ± 27 vs. 320 ± 52 ms, p = NS; QTc—460 ± 15 vs. 434 ± 38, p = NS).





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement