|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998; 32:1221-1227 © 1998 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |





* Veterans General Hospital-Taipei and National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Peoples Republic of China
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Division of Cardiology, St. Marianna University Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
Manuscript received February 25, 1998; revised manuscript received June 24, 1998, accepted July 6, 1998.
Address for correspondence: Dr. David A. Kass, Halsted 500, Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21287
dkass{at}eureka.wbme.jhu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Background. Arterial rigidity with age likely enhances blood pressure sensitivity to ventricular filling volume shifts. Tandem increases in ventricular systolic stiffness may also occur and could potentially enhance this sensitivity.
Methods. Invasive left ventricular pressure-volume relations were measured by conductance catheter in 57 adults aged 19 to 93 years. Patients had normal heart function and no cardiac hypertrophy and were referred for catheterization to evaluate chest pain. Twenty-eight subjects had normal coronary angiography and hemodynamics, and the remaining had either systolic hypertension or coronary artery disease without infarction. Data recorded at rest and during transient preload reduction by inferior vena caval obstruction yielded systolic and diastolic left ventricular chamber and effective arterial stiffness and pulse pressure.
Results. Left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction and heart rate were unaltered by age, whereas vascular load and stiffening increased (p < 0.008). Arterial stiffening (Ea) was matched by increased ventricular systolic stiffness (Ees):
, (r = 0.50, p < 0.0001), maintaining arterial-heart interaction (Ea/Ees ratio) age-independent. Ventricular systolic and diastolic stiffnesses correlated (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001) and increased with age (p < 0.03). Both ventricular and vascular stiffening significantly increased systolic pressure sensitivity to cardiac preload (p < 0.006).
Conclusions. Arterial stiffening with age is matched by ventricular systolic stiffening even without hypertrophy. The two effects contribute to elevating systolic pressure sensitivity to altered chamber filling. In addition to recognized baroreflex and autonomic dysfunction with age, combined stiffening could further enhance pressure lability with diuretics and postural shifts in the elderly.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Chronic cardiac ejection into increasingly stiff arteries has been implicated in the evolution of LV diastolic dysfunction and structural remodeling of the aging myocardium (14,15). However, important changes in systolic function may also occur, such as a rise in maximal ventricular systolic stiffening, as measured by the end systolic elastance (Ees). End systolic elastance is a key determinant of heart-arterial interaction and normally matches with vascular load to achieve near optimal mechanical and metabolic function (16,17). It is therefore possible that elderly patients with vascular stiffening may have an altered Ees to maintain matching even in the absence of ventricular hypertrophy.
Combined ventricular-vascular stiffening could potentially have important consequences on the cardiac response to varied filling volume, since a stiff heart-arterial system generates more systolic pressure change for a given change in ejected stroke volume (SV) or ventricular volume. Superimposed upon abnormalities of autonomic/baroreflex regulation associated with aging (1820), such stiffening would exacerbate blood pressure fluctuations from postural or postprandial stress and with diuretics or fluid/salt restriction (2124). The present study tested the hypothesis that aging is associated with tandem changes in vascular and ventricular systolic stiffening in the absence of cardiac hypertrophy, and that both stiffnesses contribute to greater systolic pressure lability with cardiac preload alteration.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was in a normal range in all patients (mean 64 ± 7%). Twenty-eight subjects (group 1) had no discernible coronary artery disease and were normotensive. Chronic medications in this group were a beta-blocking agent (n = 4), nifedipine (n = 1) and diltiazem (n = 1). Of these subjects,
25% had a positive stress-thallium study, mostly on the basis of perfusion defects and often without symptoms. The remaining 29 subjects (group 2) had a history of systolic hypertension or coronary artery disease without infarction and were included to reflect the high prevalence of both conditions in the aging population. Chronic medications in this group were beta-blockers (n = 7), nifedipine (n = 4), verapamil (n = 2) and diltiazem (n = 4). All medications were withheld 24 h prior to study. Table 1 provides clinical characteristics of the study subjects (40 men, 17 women, aged 19 to 93 years) in the two groups. The groups were comparable except for a greater proportion of men, slower heart rate and very slightly higher EF for group 2.
|
Pressure volume data were recorded at rest and during changes in ventricular filling induced by balloon obstruction of inferior vena caval inflow. An occlusion catheter (SP-09168; Cordis, Miami, Florida) was advanced to the right atrium and rapidly inflated with 10 to 20 ml CO2 to impede blood return for
10 s. Data recorded during this maneuver provided assessment of LV systolic and diastolic chamber elastance (e.g., stiffness) and the sensitivity of systolic pressure to varied chamber filling.
Data analysis. Data were digitized at 200 Hz and analyzed using custom software. Rest hemodynamics were determined from cardiac cycles just prior to vena caval obstruction. End systolic elastance was the slope of the end systolic PV relation (26) (Fig. 1A), with end systole defined as the point of maximal stiffness for each beat. End diastolic elastance (Ed) was assessed from the lower PV boundary using data from the mid-third of filling from the same multiple beats, and fit to a linear regression (Fig. 1A). These data also quantified the sensitivity of systolic pressure to changes in ventricular end diastolic filling volume. For each beat during preload decline, peak systolic pressure was determined and plotted against EDV for the same cycle. The linear regression slope of this relation defined the sensitivity.
|
Arterial load and stiffness were also indexed by the effective arterial elastance (Ea), which is equal to the ratio of ventricular end systolic pressure divided by SV (27,28) (Fig. 1B). Since ventricular end systolic pressure varies directly with mean aortic pressure (28), Ea is similar to the product of heart rate times the ratio of mean pressure to cardiac output (27), and reflects mean and pulsatile components of arterial load (28). The ratio of Ea/Ees indexes ventricular-arterial matching (27,29), with a normal ratio at 0.6 to 1.2 (16,17).
Statistical analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Between-group comparisons were performed using an unpaired Student t test or chi-square test. Age effects on ventricular-arterial hemodynamics and the influence of age and ventricular-vascular stiffening on systolic pressure and work-cardiac volume dependencies were performed using univariate and multivariate linear regression models. Covariance analysis revealed that patient group had no interaction effect, influencing neither slope nor offset for any of the regressions. Therefore, results are generally reported from analysis of the combined 57 patients.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Age-dependent ventricular-vascular stiffening. Aortic PP and Ea both significantly increased with age (p < 0.008; Fig. 2), supporting age-dependent pulsatile load increase. As expected from its defining equation, Ea correlated with peripheral resistance and heart rate, but also varied with arterial PP (p < 0.0001 for each contributor by multivariate analysis, r = 0.92 for total regression), supporting influences of mean and pulsatile load on this parameter.
|
|
p < 0.0001, r = 0.51), so that the Ea/Ees ratio was maintained unchanged with age (Fig. 3C, mean ratio of 0.96 ± 0.36). End systolic elastance also correlated with diastolic elastance (
r = 0.50, p < 0.0001; Fig. 3D), and each correlation was significant for individual subgroups as well. Finally, Ees and Ed both rose with age (r = 0.29, p < 0.03, for each) by separate regression analysis. Sensitivity of systolic pressure to cardiac preload. Combined ventricular-vascular stiffening had a major influence on the sensitivity of systolic pressure to altered preload volume. Figure 4A displays systolic pressure versus EDV for the same patients whose PV data are shown in Figure 3A. This relation was steeper for the elderly patient, indicating greater changes in systolic pressure for any relative change in EDV. Group data plotting the relation slope (SBPEDV) versus age is shown in Figure 4B, and shows a 2.5-fold increase in slope over a 70-year life span.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ventricular-vascular coupling with age. Although tandem elevation of Ees and Ea was statistically significant, there was considerable scatter, with only about 25% of an Ees change predicted by an altered Ea. This is not surprising given the sample size, the fact that Ees (and Ea) have multiple determinants and the heterogeneous condition represented by aging. Nonetheless, the data supported the hypothesis that patients with greater vascular stiffening were more likely to have increased ventricular stiffness. As demonstrated by univariate regression and supported by prior data (32), aging raised Ea principally by its effects on pulsatile loading, with an additional but smaller age-dependent effect from mean resistance (1,3,6). Only one prior study has reported how such changes might influence heart-arterial interaction (32); however, Ees was determined from a single-beat end systolic PV ratio, which can be unreliable in patients with normal or increased Ees values (33).
Although maintenance of the Ea/Ees ratio with age would seem beneficial, a rise in both parameters meant that systolic pressures became more sensitive to chamber volume manipulation. With increased Ees, even small blood volume shifts from heart to arteries translated to greater arterial pressure changes. Since contractile reserve is also linked to increases in Ees, basal elevation with age might limit some of this reserve and could contribute to a reported blunting of end systolic volume decline during exercise (34). Thus, "preserved" heart-artery matching does not necessarily mean cardiovascular reserve adaptability is also maintained.
The present data may be relevant to the increased prevalence of hypotension with normal physiologic stresses such as postural or postprandial fluid shifts (23,24,3537) and enhanced pressure changes with excess sodium intake or restriction (21,38) and diuretics (22,39). Interestingly, these symptoms occur more frequently in patients with resting supine systolic hypertension (35,36), suggesting a potential link with vascular stiffening. Many of these patients have normal EFs but abnormalities of diastolic filling and relaxation, and thus may have diastolic dysfunction. The present data show that ventricular/arterial stiffening also contributes to such sensitivity.
Factors other than ventricular-vascular stiffening also likely contribute to the regulation of systolic arterial pressure when cardiac filling volumes are altered. The baroreflex is blunted with aging (18,19), and this can compromise blood pressure homeostasis with postural changes or after meals (18,31). Downregulation of beta-adrenergic responsiveness (20) also may limit mechanisms of pressure control. In addition to its direct effect, ventricular-vascular stiffening would amplify such abnormal reflex pressure control.
Aging, Ees and Ed. Cardiac structural changes from aging have been reported, including increased LV mass, reduced myocyte content, apoptosis and an increased fraction and cross-linking of collagen (14,15,40). Such changes, as well as Doppler evidence of reduced early diastolic filling, have led to the notion that diastolic stiffness increases with age (15). The present study is the first to test and confirm this hypothesis directly from measured PV relations. We also found that such stiffness occurred in the absence of clinically apparent cardiac hypertrophy or LV dysfunction and without coronary artery disease or systolic hypertension (group 1 patients).
End systolic elastance depends both on active contraction and on diastolic and passive structural factors (41). End systolic elastance is traditionally considered a measure of contractility, as it directly varies in response to inotropic agents and is less influenced by volume and resistance load (42). However, a higher Ees with age may not mean greater contractility, since passive structural and geometric changes could also contribute. One would anticipate that an effect from factors reducing chamber distensibility in diastole, when muscle cells are relaxed and more easily distended, would become greater as systolic tension developed. This is consistent with the correlation observed between Ees and Ed, the former being primarily related to structural changes and remodeling.
Limitations. This study could not determine cause-and-effect relationships between ventricular-arterial stiffening, and such implications should be avoided. Thus, while ventricular stiffening may be a consequence of chronically increased pulsatile-plus-resistive vascular loads, it may equally be related to primary changes in ventricular material properties. Considerable variance in the relevant regressions supports a mutifactorial interaction.
The patient population was referred for cardiac catheterization, and despite having normal-appearing ventricles, the data may not reflect pure effects of aging. In addition, a subset of patients received medications that could have chronic effects on the heart or arterial system. However, features of the data suggest the results likely did reflect aging physiology in a general population. First, there was generally no difference in findings for the two subgroups, and both groups contributed patients with similar distributions of vascular stiffness and age. Drug therapy was varied and randomly distributed across age, making it unlikely to influence the regressions. It is always possible that group 1 subjects had some coronary flow limitations despite normal epicardial vessels. There was no evidence for limited diastolic flow, however, as the diastolic period was near 50% of the cardiac cycle in these subjects. Finally, aging influences on the arterial vasculature have been well established by many general aging population studies (13,32) and were similarly observed in the present investigation. In particular, the per-decade rate of systolic and PP increase in the ascending aorta was similar to that previously reported (2,30). The gradual rise in both parameters even in patients younger than 50 years distinguishes these data from those derived from brachial arterial pressure, where values plateau below age 50 (6).
Conclusions. The recognition that changes in both vascular load and ventricular systolic stiffness contribute to an enhanced sensitivity of arterial systolic pressures and cardiac work to ventricular volume changes may have important therapeutic significance. Combining negative inotropic agents to reduce systolic stiffness with vasodilators to lower vascular stiffness would be expected to substantially diminish these sensitivities of blood pressure and cardiac work to volume change. Thus, in elderly patients in whom volume management is problematic, or arterial pressures display marked lability with salt loading, diuretics, fluid intake or exertional stress, the combination vasodilator/negative inotropic therapy might prove beneficial. Larger-scale prospective studies will be needed to directly test this hypothesis in elderly patients.
| Appendix |
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. V. Ennezat, N. Lamblin, F. Mouquet, O. Tricot, P. Quandalle, V. Aumegeat, O. Equine, O. Nugue, B. Segrestin, P. de Groote, et al. The effect of ageing on cardiac remodelling and hospitalization for heart failure after an inaugural anterior myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., June 20, 2008; (2008) ehn267v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Shibata, J. L. Hastings, A. Prasad, Q. Fu, K. Okazaki, M. D. Palmer, R. Zhang, and B. D. Levine 'Dynamic' Starling mechanism: effects of ageing and physical fitness on ventricular-arterial coupling J. Physiol., April 1, 2008; 586(7): 1951 - 1962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Shapiro, T. E. Owan, S. Mohammed, M. Kruger, W. A. Linke, J. C. Burnett Jr, and M. M. Redfield Mineralocorticoid Signaling in Transition to Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 289 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Osranek, J. H. Eisenach, B. K. Khandheria, K. Chandrasekaran, J. B. Seward, and M. Belohlavek Arterioventricular Coupling and Ventricular Efficiency After Antihypertensive Therapy: A Noninvasive Prospective Study Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 275 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Van den Bergh, A. Vanderper, P. Vangheluwe, F. Desjardins, I. Nevelsteen, W. Verreth, F. Wuytack, P. Holvoet, W. Flameng, J.-L. Balligand, et al. Dyslipidaemia in type II diabetic mice does not aggravate contractile impairment but increases ventricular stiffness Cardiovasc Res, January 15, 2008; 77(2): 371 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.-H. Pan, H.-M. Tsao, N.-C. Chang, Y.-J. Chen, and S.-A. Chen Aging Dilates Atrium and Pulmonary Veins: Implications for the Genesis of Atrial Fibrillation Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 190 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Borlaug, V. Melenovsky, M. M. Redfield, K. Kessler, H.-J. Chang, T. P. Abraham, and D. A. Kass Impact of Arterial Load and Loading Sequence on Left Ventricular Tissue Velocities in Humans J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 16, 2007; 50(16): 1570 - 1577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Shapiro, C. S.P. Lam, J. B. Patel, S. F. Mohammed, M. Kruger, D. M. Meyer, W. A. Linke, and M. M. Redfield Acute and Chronic Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Systole and Diastole: Insights From an Elderly Hypertensive Model Hypertension, September 1, 2007; 50(3): 503 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Melenovsky, B. A. Borlaug, B. Rosen, I. Hay, L. Ferruci, C. H. Morell, E. G. Lakatta, S. S. Najjar, and D. A. Kass Cardiovascular Features of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Versus Nonfailing Hypertensive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in the Urban Baltimore Community: The Role of Atrial Remodeling/Dysfunction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2007; 49(2): 198 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Shapiro, M. D. McGoon, and M. M. Redfield Unexplained Pulmonary Hypertension in Elderly Patients Chest, January 1, 2007; 131(1): 94 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Chung, A. Strunc, R. Oliver, and S. J. Kovacs Diastolic ventricular-vascular stiffness and relaxation relation: elucidation of coupling via pressure phase plane-derived indexes Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2415 - H2423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Brassard, A. Ferland, V. Gaudreault, N. Bonneville, J. Jobin, and P. Poirier Elevated peak exercise systolic blood pressure is not associated with reduced exercise capacity in subjects with Type 2 diabetes J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2006; 101(3): 893 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Redfield, S. J. Jacobsen, B. A. Borlaug, R. J. Rodeheffer, and D. A. Kass Age- and Gender-Related Ventricular-Vascular Stiffening: A Community-Based Study Circulation, October 11, 2005; 112(15): 2254 - 2262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Kass Ventricular Arterial Stiffening: Integrating the Pathophysiology Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 185 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Perez-David, M. A. Garcia-Fernandez, M. J. Ledesma, N. Malpica, T. L. Fernandez, A. Santos, M. Moreno, J. C. Antoranz, J. Bermejo, and M. Desco Age-related intramyocardial patterns in healthy subjects evaluated with Doppler tissue imaging Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2005; 6(3): 175 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Segers, D. Georgakopoulos, M. Afanasyeva, H. C. Champion, D. P. Judge, H. D. Millar, P. Verdonck, D. A. Kass, N. Stergiopulos, and N. Westerhof Conductance catheter-based assessment of arterial input impedance, arterial function, and ventricular-vascular interaction in mice Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1157 - H1164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. B. Popovic, U. N. Khot, G. M. Novaro, F. Casas, N. L. Greenberg, M. J. Garcia, G. S. Francis, and J. D. Thomas Effects of sodium nitroprusside in aortic stenosis associated with severe heart failure: pressure-volume loop analysis using a numerical model Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): H416 - H423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Najjar, S. P. Schulman, G. Gerstenblith, J. L. Fleg, D. A. Kass, F. O'Connor, L. C. Becker, and E. G. Lakatta Age and gender affect ventricular-vascular coupling during aerobic exercise J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 4, 2004; 44(3): 611 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Chen, Y.-P. Lin, W.-C. Yu, W.-C. Yang, and Y.-A. Ding Volume Status and Blood Pressure During Long-Term Hemodialysis: Role of Ventricular Stiffness Hypertension, September 1, 2003; 42(3): 257 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bonapace, A. Rossi, M. Cicoira, L. Franceschini, G. Golia, L. Zanolla, P. Marino, and P. Zardini Aortic Distensibility Independently Affects Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy Circulation, April 1, 2003; 107(12): 1603 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kawaguchi, I. Hay, B. Fetics, and D. A. Kass Combined Ventricular Systolic and Arterial Stiffening in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Implications for Systolic and Diastolic Reserve Limitations Circulation, February 11, 2003; 107(5): 714 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Myers, W. B. Farquhar, D. E. Forman, T. D. Williams, D. L. Dierks, and J. A. Taylor Carotid distensibility characterized via the isometric exercise pressor response Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): H2592 - H2598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Kitzman, W. C. Little, P. H. Brubaker, R. T. Anderson, W. G. Hundley, C. T. Marburger, B. Brosnihan, T. M. Morgan, and K. P. Stewart Pathophysiological Characterization of Isolated Diastolic Heart Failure in Comparison to Systolic Heart Failure JAMA, November 6, 2002; 288(17): 2144 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||