Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article

Please click here to obtain permission to reproduce this image.

Click on image to view larger version.



Figure 5 The effects of dobutamine on position and slope of the ESPVR, dP/dtMAX – VED and PRSW relations, in control (open bars) and with stenosis (shaded bars). The position of the ESPVR was characterized by calculating the end-systolic volume intercept at a fixed systolic pressure, the position of the dP/dtMAX – VED and PRSW relations by calculating the intercept at a fixed end-diastolic volume (see text for details). A and B show, respectively, the position (VESIND) and the slope (EES) of the ESPVR. C and D show the position (dP/dtMAXIND) and the slope of the dP/dtMAX – VED relation. E and F show the position (SWIND) and the slope of the PRSW relation. Statistical significance vs. baseline (dobutamine = 0) within each group (control or stenosis) is indicated by: # = p < 0.05; ## = p < 0.01. Significant differences between control and stenosis at a each dobutamine level are indicated by: * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01. For details see text and Table 1.





Right arrow Return to article

 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement