Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 53:919-928, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.029 (Published online 23 December 2008).
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View CVN News Brief
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brilakis, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brilakis, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

A Randomized-Controlled Trial of a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Versus a Similar Bare-Metal Stent in Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions

The SOS (Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts) Trial

Emmanouil S. Brilakis, MD, PhD, FACC*,{dagger},*, Christopher Lichtenwalter, MD*,{dagger}, James A. de Lemos, MD, FACC*,{dagger}, Michele Roesle, RN*, Owen Obel, MD*,{dagger}, Donald Haagen, RCIS*, Bilal Saeed, MD{ddagger}, Chiranjeevi Gadiparthi, MD*,{dagger}, Joseph K. Bissett, MD, FACC§, Rajesh Sachdeva, MD, FACC§, Vassilios V. Voudris, MD, PhD, FACC||, Panagiotis Karyofillis, MD||, Biswajit Kar, MD, FACC, James Rossen, MD, FACC#, Panayotis Fasseas, MD, FACC**, Peter Berger, MD, FACC{dagger}{dagger} and Subhash Banerjee, MD, FACC*,{dagger}

* Veterans Affairs North Texas Healthcare System, Dallas, Texas
{dagger} University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
{ddagger} Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio
§ Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
|| Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
# Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa
** Wheaton Franciscan Medical Group, Racine, Wisconsin
{dagger}{dagger} Geisinger Clinic, Danville, Pennsylvania


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Flowchart of the Patients Enrolled in the SOS Trial

BMS = bare-metal stent(s); CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; FU = follow-up; PES = paclitaxel-eluting stent(s); SOS = Stenting Of Saphenous Vein Grafts.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 In-Stent MLD Cumulative Frequency Distributions in the 2 Study Groups

Cumulative frequency distribution curves for minimal luminal diameter (MLD) in the group that received a bare-metal stent (BMS) and in the group that received a paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). (A) The cumulative frequency distribution curves before and immediately after the intervention. (B) The curves immediately after intervention and at 12-month follow-up angiography.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier Curves of the Study's Clinical End Points

No difference in overall mortality was found between the study groups (A). A trend for lower incidence of myocardial infarctions was seen in the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) group (B). The incidence of target lesion revascularization (C) and of target vessel failure (D), composite end point of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, was significantly lower in the PES group than the bare-metal stent (BMS) group.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement