Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:2051-2058, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.070 (Published online 5 November 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naoumova, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Camici, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Naoumova, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Camici, P. G.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Pioglitazone Improves Myocardial Blood Flow and Glucose Utilization in Nondiabetic Patients With Combined Hyperlipidemia

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Rossi P. Naoumova, MD, PhD, FAHA, MRCP*, Heiko Kindler, MD, MRCP*, Lucia Leccisotti, MD*,{dagger}, Marco Mongillo, MD, PhD*, Muhammad T. Khan, MD, FRCS*, Clare Neuwirth, RN*, Mary Seed, MA, DM, FRCPath, FREP{ddagger}, Paul Holvoet, PhD, FAHA§, John Betteridge, PhD, MD, FAHA, FRCP|| and Paolo G. Camici, MD, FESC, FACC, FAHA, FRCP*,#,*

* Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
# National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
{dagger} Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
{ddagger} Lipid Clinic, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom
§ Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
|| Department of Medicine, University College London, University College Hospitals, London, United Kingdom. Supported in part by an unrestricted grant from Takeda Europe.


Figure 1
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Diagram Depicting the Study Protocol With the Relative Timings

Thin arrows = hospital visits when blood pressure, pulse, and body weight were checked and fasting blood sample obtained; thick arrows = positron emission tomography (PET) scans; thick line = study medication (placebo/pioglitazone) with randomization at visit 2; stethoscope = physical examination.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 M and MGU in Placebo and Pioglitazone Groups at Baseline and After Treatment

After treatment, significant increases in whole body glucose disposal (M) and myocardial glucose utilization (MGU) were obtained only in the pioglitazone group. Error bars indicate SEM. *p < 0.05 for treatment differences between the placebo and pioglitazone groups.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Hyperemic MBF in Placebo and Pioglitazone Groups at Baseline and After Treatment

After treatment, a significant increase in hyperemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) was observed in the pioglitazone group. Error bars indicate SEM. *p < 0.05 within-treatment effect.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement