Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:1617-1626, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.028 (Published online 6 October 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dauerman, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dauerman, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. J.

Vascular Closure Devices

The Second Decade

Harold L. Dauerman, MD, FACC*,*, Robert J. Applegate, MD, FACC{dagger} and David J. Cohen, MD, MSc{ddagger}

* Division of Cardiology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
{dagger} Division of Cardiology, Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
{ddagger} Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 The First Decade of Vascular Closure Devices

The first decade of vascular closure devices according to their year of Food and Drug Administration approval. During this transition from bare-metal to drug-eluting stent eras, other factors may have influenced vascular complication rates (i.e., percutaneous coronary intervention pharmacology). GP = glycoprotein.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Overview of Vascular Closure Device Types

Vascular closure methods are: 1) passive and delayed—manual compression with assistance (Femostop) or enhancement (patches); and 2) active and immediate—collagen-based with or without anchor and suture, suture-based, and staple/clip-mediated.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 The Declining Rate of Vascular Complications

Over the past 5 years, major vascular complications have decreased among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. *Arterial injury and/or arterial injury-related bleeding (n = 36,631 patients undergoing PCI).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 High-Risk Femoral Anatomy

Nonideal femoral anatomy includes patients with femoral arterial disease and sheath insertion outside the common femoral artery. Utilization of vascular closure devices in these situations warrants further study.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Intravascular Versus Extravascular Closure Devices

New staple- and clip-mediated (StarClose or Angiolink) vascular closure devices have a potential advantage of being "extravascular" with no anchor (Angio-Seal) or suture (Perclose). This may be especially significant in situations where minor femoral artery lumen compromise would be clinically consequential (i.e., mild-moderate femoral arterial disease).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement