Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:1324-1331, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.069 (Published online 14 September 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Appendix and Videos
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lellouche, N.
Right arrow Articles by Shivkumar, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lellouche, N.
Right arrow Articles by Shivkumar, K.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Functional Characterization of Atrial Electrograms in Sinus Rhythm Delineates Sites of Parasympathetic Innervation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Nicolas Lellouche, MD, Eric Buch, MD, Andrew Celigoj, BS, Carin Siegerman, PhD, David Cesario, MD, PhD, Carlos De Diego, MD, Aman Mahajan, MD, PhD, Noel G. Boyle, MD, PhD, Isaac Wiener, MD, Alan Garfinkel, PhD and Kalyanam Shivkumar, MD, PhD*

UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Classification and Regression Tree Model

Likelihood of parasympathetic response (PR) according to pre-ablation electrogram characteristics. The total number of ablation sites (n = 1,662) is represented by the pie diagram at the top. The shaded area of each pie diagram is proportional to the number of sites in that group showing a parasympathetic response to ablation. According to this tree analysis, we defined 3 electrogram patterns: normal, low-amplitude fractionated electrogram (LAFE), and high-amplitude fractionated electrogram (HAFE).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Three EGM Patterns Seen in the LA and Typical Responses to Ablation

A = atrial deflection; EGM = electrogram; H = His bundle deflection; LA = left atrium; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Incidence of PR to Ablation According to Pre-Ablation EGM Pattern

Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Atrial EGM Recording During Adenosine Infusion

(A) Fluoroscopic image in the left anterior oblique view of typical intracardiac catheter locations during adenosine infusion. (B) Superimposition of the surface electrocardiogram P-wave in lead V1 and atrial EGM. CS = coronary sinus catheter; ICE = intracardiac echocardiography catheter; LA = left atrial catheter; RA = right atrial catheter; RV = right ventricular catheter; other abbreviations as in Figure 2.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Effect of Adenosine on Left Atrial EGM Morphology

Recordings from the same site just before (A) and after (B) adenosine infusion. EGM = electrogram.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6 Adenosine-Induced Changes in Atrial EGMs

(A) Average number of deflections by patient. (B) Change in deflections from baseline. (C) Effects of adenosine on atrial electrograms. EGM = electrogram; LA = left atrial; RA = right atrial.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7 Mathematical Modeling

(Left) (A) Electrograms from normal tissue; (B) fibrotic tissue showing low-amplitude fractionation; (C) tissue exposed to acetylcholine, showing high-amplitude fractionation. (Right) Tissue pattern followed by snapshots of the advancing wavefront. In normal tissue (A), the pattern is homogeneous. In fibrosis (B), gray areas represent inexcitable scar tissue. In tissue exposed to acetylcholine (C), darker shaded areas indicate patches of IKACh and lowered diffusion.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement