Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:765-771, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.041 (Published online 21 July 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebeling Barbier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ahlström, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ebeling Barbier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ahlström, H.

Myocardial Scars More Frequent Than Expected

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detects Potential Risk Group

Charlotte Ebeling Barbier, MD*,*, Tomas Bjerner, MD, PhD*, Lars Johansson, PhD*,{dagger}, Lars Lind, MD, PhD{dagger},{ddagger} and Håkan Ahlström, MD, PhD*

* Department of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
{dagger} AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
{ddagger} Department of Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Groups were formed from the population-based sample of 70-year-old subjects. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; No MI = no myocardial infarction scar; RMI = recognized myocardial infarction (i.e., MI scar in combination with MI diagnosis in medical records); UMI = unrecognized myocardial infarction.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (79K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Short-axis magnetic resonance images from 10 consecutive subjects displaying previously unrecognized myocardial infarctions. Note that these myocardial infarction scars were visible in the same location in both short and long axis and that some involve the subendocardial layer in another slice than the one displayed.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 The distribution of unrecognized (A) and recognized (B) myocardial infarction scars between the 17 segments of the American Heart Association segmentation.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Differences in ejection fraction (EF) and in left ventricular (LV) mass adjusted for body surface area (BSA) and gender between the subjects without myocardial infarction scars (No MI), those with unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI), and those with recognized myocardial infarction (RMI). *p < 0.0167 (i.e., 0.05 with Bonferroni correction).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement