Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 48:747-753, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.084 (Published online 24 July 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viitasalo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Toivonen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viitasalo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Toivonen, L.

Effects of Beta-Blocker Therapy on Ventricular Repolarization Documented by 24-h Electrocardiography in Patients With Type 1 Long-QT Syndrome

Matti Viitasalo, MD*,*, Lasse Oikarinen, MD*, Heikki Swan, MD*, Heikki Väänänen, MSc{dagger}, Jere Järvenpää, MD*, Harri Hietanen, MD*, Jouko Karjalainen, MD* and Lauri Toivonen, MD, FACC*

* Department of Cardiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
{dagger} Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland


Figure 1
View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The measurement of QT end and T-wave peak to T-wave end (TPE) intervals as well as the T2/T1-wave amplitude ratio in cases with bifid T waves. Vertical lines show the peak and the end of the T wave; see text for details. In the top panel, with an interpeak difference of 0.08 s, the second peak is a part of the T-wave. In the middle panel, with an interpeak difference of 0.2 s, the second peak is a U wave. In the bottom panel the interpeak difference is 0.18 s, but because the second peak is higher it is interpreted as a T2-wave with a T2/T1-wave amplitude ratio of 3.7.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Maximal QT end intervals (higher two lines) and QT end intervals at stable heart rates (lower two lines) at specified heart rates before the treatment with beta-blockers (broken lines) and during the treatment with beta-blockers (solid lines) in 24 long-QT syndrome type 1 (LQT1) patients. **p < 0.01 before the treatment versus during the treatment with beta-blockers at RR intervals from 600 to 700 ms.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Maximal T-wave peak to T-wave end (TPE) intervals (higher two lines) and median TPE intervals, calculated from all beats (lower two lines), at specified heart rates before the treatment with beta-blockers (broken lines) and during the treatment with beta-blockers (solid lines) in 24 long-QT syndrome type 1 (LQT1) patients. *p < 0.05 before the treatment versus during the treatment with beta-blockers at RR intervals from 600 to 700 ms.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Maximal T2/T1-wave amplitude ratios during 24-h before (pre-BB) and during (post-BB) the treatment with beta-blockers in 24 long-QT syndrome type 1 (LQT1) patients. The broken line shows the average values.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement