This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Otto, C. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Otto, C. M.

Valvular Aortic Stenosis

Disease Severity and Timing of Intervention

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

View larger version (150K): [in a new window]   Figure 1 Standard evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) severity is based on measurement of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter (D) in a parasternal long-axis view for calculation of a circular cross-sectional area (CSA), outflow tract velocity (V) from an apical approach using pulsed Doppler, and the maximum aortic jet (AS-Jet, Vmax) from the continuous-wave Doppler recording. Either velocity-time integrals (VTIs) or maximum velocities can be used in the continuity equation for aortic valve area (AVA).

View larger version (19K): [in a new window]   Figure 2 Schematic representation of the flow and static pressure across the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract, aortic valve, and ascending aorta during systole. AA = aortic cross-sectional area; AVA = effective aortic valve area (i.e., the cross-sectional area of the vena contracta); LVSP = left ventricular systolic pressure; MGnet = transvalvular pressure gradient after pressure recovery (i.e., net MG); MGvc = transvalvular pressure gradient at the vena contracta; SAP = systolic aortic pressure; SAPvc = systolic aortic pressure at the vena contracta; SV = stroke volume; SVi = stroke volume index; ZVA = valvulo-arterial impedance. From Briand et al. (12), with permission.

View larger version (10K): [in a new window]   Figure 3 Hemodynamic data in a model of aortic stenosis were obtained using a dual micromanometer catheter and a transit time flow probe. (A) The simultaneous instantaneous electrocardiogram, aortic and left ventricular (LV) pressures, transaortic volume flow (Q), and aortic pressure gradient (P) are shown. During late ejection P is negative. (B) The phase diagram of P-Q for this cardiac cycle demonstrates the nonlinearity and time dependence of the P-Q relationship. EKG = electrocardiogram. From Bermejo et al. (15), with permission.

View larger version (16K): [in a new window]   Figure 4 Suggested approach to evaluation of adults with severe aortic stenosis. Additional considerations include comorbidities and patient preferences. AVA = aortic valve area; AVR = aortic valve replacement; BNP = brain natriuretic peptide; BP = blood pressure; CRF = cardiac risk factors; f/u = follow-up; LV = left ventricular; Vmax = maximum velocity.

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Figure 5 Suggested approach to evaluation of adults with moderate aortic stenosis (AS). *Additional evaluation of AS severity may include measurement of newer parameters discussed in the text, evaluation of the extent of leaflet calcification, cardiac catheterization, and/or dobutamine stress echocardiography. Dx = diagnosis; Rx = therapy; other abbreviations as in Figure 4.

View larger version (101K): [in a new window]   Figure 6 Example of decision making with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic regurgitation (AR). This 59-year-old man has a markedly calcified aortic valve, but aortic velocity is only 3.7 m/s, mean gradient 34 mm Hg, and valve area is 1.3 cm2. Moderate regurgitation also is present with a vena contract of 5 mm, and holodiastolic flow reversal in the descending aorta. However, significant left ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction are present, so that aortic valve replacement is appropriate. EF = ejection fraction; ESD = end-systolic dimension.

View larger version (114K): [in a new window]   Figure 7 This 82-year-old woman underwent echocardiography for evaluation of a systolic murmur. The valve was heavily calcified as seen the short-axis view (top) with reduced systolic opening in the long-axis view (bottom), with Doppler data consistent with severe stenosis. At cardiac catheterization several days later, a lower pressure gradient and lower stroke volume were recorded. The apparent discrepancy in the catheterization data most likely is related to pressure recovery and severe hypertension (blood pressure [BP] 194 systolic during catheterization). AoV = aortic valve; AVA = aortic valve area; Grad = gradient; Mn = mean; Pk = peak; SV = stroke volume; Vmax = maximum velocity; VTI = velocity time integral.

View larger version (129K): [in a new window]   Figure 8 Dobutamine stress echocardiography was requested in this 52-year-old man with a history of radiation therapy with heart failure symptoms, left ventricular dysfunction, and a calcified aortic valve. With dobutamine, ejection fraction (EF) and stroke volume (SV) increased, indicating contractile reserve. Outflow tract peak velocity increased from 0.9 to 1.0 cm/s (left ventricular outflow tract [LVOT] diameter 2.2 cm), so calculated aortic valve area was unchanged at 1.0 cm2 at rest and at peak dose dobutamine consistent with stiff inflexible leaflets. AS-Jet = aortic jet.