Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:2057-2062, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.061 (Published online 24 April 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Losay, J.
Right arrow Articles by Serraf, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Losay, J.
Right arrow Articles by Serraf, A.

Aortic Valve Regurgitation After Arterial Switch Operation for Transposition of the Great Arteries

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome

Jean Losay, MD*, Anita Touchot, MD, Andre Capderou, MD, PhD, Jean-Dominique Piot, MD, Emre Belli, MD, Claude Planché, MD, PhD and Alain Serraf, MD, PhD

Centre Chirurgical Marie-Lannelongue, Le Plessis-Robinson, France


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Median follow-up duration according to the year of surgery showed in abscissa; the numbers below indicate the number of patients operated on during this year. Ordinate is the time from surgery in years. Squares = median value of the follow-up, tips = minimum and maximum.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (A) Actuarial estimate of freedom from aortic regurgitation (AR) (grade ≥I) in the 1,156 hospital survivors after the arterial switch operation. Numbers indicate number of patients observed at the beginning of an interval. (B) Hazard function for AR in 1,156 survivors after the arterial switch operation. Dotted lines = 95% confidence interval.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (6K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Evolution of the aortic regurgitation at the end of the follow-up according to the aortic regurgitation grade at discharge. 0 = absence, I = trivial, II = mild, III = moderate, IV = severe.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 (A) Actuarial survival free of reoperation for aortic regurgitation for the 1,156 survivors. Numbers indicate number of patients observed at the beginning of interval. (B) Hazard function for reoperation for aortic regurgitation in the 1,156 survivors. Dotted lines = 95% confidence interval. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (7K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Actuarial survival according to the presence or absence of aortic regurgitation. Lines and numbers related to subjects without aortic regurgitation are in bold. Numbers indicate the number of patients observed at the beginning of an interval. Dotted lines = 95% confidence interval.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement