JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:1840-1845, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.078 (Published online 17 April 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coles, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baumbach, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coles, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baumbach, A.

Comparison of Radiation Doses From Multislice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography and Conventional Diagnostic Angiography

Duncan R. Coles, BSc, MB BS*, Mary A. Smail, MSc{dagger}, Ian S. Negus, MSc{dagger}, Peter Wilde, BSc, BM BCh{ddagger}, Martin Oberhoff, MD*, Karl R. Karsch, MD, FACC*,* and Andreas Baumbach, MD*

* Cardiology
{dagger} Medical Physics and Bioengineering
{ddagger} Clinical Radiology, Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom.


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1 Effective doses from multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and conventional coronary angiography.

 




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.