Patent Foramen Ovale: Innocent or Guilty?
Evidence From a Prospective Population-Based Study
Irene Meissner, MD*,||,*,
Bijoy K. Khandheria, MD ,
John A. Heit, MD*,
George W. Petty, MD*,
Sheldon G. Sheps, MD ,
Gary L. Schwartz, MD ,
Jack P. Whisnant, MD ,
David O. Wiebers, MD*,||,
Jody L. Covalt¶,
Tanya M. Petterson||,
Teresa J.H. Christianson|| and
Yoram Agmon, MD*
* Department of Neurology
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension
Department of Health Sciences Research
|| Division of Epidemiology
¶ Stroke Research Center
|| Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

View larger version (7K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival free of cerebrovascular events in 577 subjects according to presence of patent foramen ovale (PFO).
|
|

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival free of cerebrovascular events in 585 subjects according to presence of atrial septal aneurysm (ASA).
|
|

View larger version (7K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival free of cerebrovascular events in 585 subjects according to presence of venous thromboembolism (VTE).
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4 Detection of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in different populations. Pop Cntrl = population-based randomly selected controls; Pop Crypto = population-based cryptogenic stroke; Ref Cntrl = referred control subjects/patients; Ref Crypto = referred cryptogenic stroke patients.
|
|
|