cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006; 47:1507-1517, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.077 (Published online 23 March 2006).
© 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cesario, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dec, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cesario, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dec, G. W.

Implantable Cardioverter- Defibrillator Therapy in Clinical Practice

David A. Cesario, MD, PhD* and G. William Dec, MD{dagger},*

* University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California
{dagger} Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Heart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Boston, Massachusetts


Figure 1
View larger version (46K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Ejection fraction (EF) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indications. It is well established that reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a predictor of increased sudden cardiac death risk and may be useful as an indication for ICD implantation. A number of clinical trials have shown that ICD therapy confers a significant survival benefit when implanted in certain subpopulations with a reduced LVEF, including survivors of cardiac arrest, ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, and possibly dilated cardiomyopathy patients. The final row in this figure lists the clinical trials that support ICD implantation in each of these groups. *The Defibrillators in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) trial showed a trend toward improved overall survival in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and ejection fraction <36%, but failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). AVID = Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators; CABG = coronary artery bypass graft surgery; CASH = Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg; CIDS = Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study; MADIT = Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trials (MADIT I and II); MI = myocardial infarction; MUSTT = Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial; SCD-HeFT = Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home