The Role of Risk Stratification in the Decision to Provide Upstream Versus Selective Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors for Acute Coronary Syndromes
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Ruchira Glaser, MD*,*,
Henry A. Glick, PhD
,
Howard C. Herrmann, MD, FACC* and
Stephen E. Kimmel, MD, MSCE, FACC*,
* Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Decision tree comparing upstream early use of tirofiban or eptifibatide in all patients versus selective use of abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Squares = decision; circles = chance events; triangles = outcomes. ACS = acute coronary syndrome; CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; MI = myocardial infarction.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Cost effectiveness of upstream glycoprotein IIb/IIIa use according to Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score of patient.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3 Benefits of upstream versus selective glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa use by rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CE = cost effectiveness.
|
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.