Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46:508-515, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.070 (Published online 14 July 2005).
© 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohkubo, T.
Right arrow Articles by Imai, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohkubo, T.
Right arrow Articles by Imai, Y.

Prognosis of "Masked" Hypertension and "White-Coat" Hypertension Detected by 24-h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

10-Year Follow-Up From the Ohasama Study

Takayoshi Ohkubo, MD, PhD*,§,||,*, Masahiro Kikuya, MD, PhD*,§, Hirohito Metoki, MD{dagger},§,||, Kei Asayama, MD{dagger},§,||, Taku Obara, MS{dagger},§, Junichiro Hashimoto, MD, PhD*,§,||, Kazuhito Totsune, MD, PhD{dagger},§,||, Haruhisa Hoshi, MD, PhD, Hiroshi Satoh, MD, PhD{ddagger},§,|| and Yutaka Imai, MD, PhD{dagger},§,||

* Departments of Planning for Drug Development and Clinical Evaluation
{dagger} Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
{ddagger} Environmental Health Science
§ Tohoku University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science and Medicine
|| Tohoku University 21st Century COE Program "Comprehensive Research and Education Center for Planning of Drug Development and Clinical Evaluation," Sendai
Ohasama Hospital, Iwate, Japan



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Relative hazards (RH) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of sustained normal blood pressure (SNBP), white-coat hypertension (WCHT), masked hypertension (MHT), and sustained hypertension (SHT) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, stroke morbidity, and the composite of CVD mortality/stroke morbidity. Numbers inside bars indicate 95% CI. The SNBP group was treated as the reference category.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Relative hazards (RH) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of sustained normal blood pressure (SNBP), white-coat hypertension (WCHT), masked hypertension (MHT), and sustained hypertension (SHT) for risk of the composite of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality/stroke morbidity by gender. Numbers inside bars indicate 95% CI. The SNBP group was treated as the reference category.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Relative hazards (RH) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of sustained normal blood pressure (SNBP), white-coat hypertension (WCHT), masked hypertension (MHT), and sustained hypertension (SHT) for risk of the composite of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality/stroke morbidity by use of antihypertensive treatment. Treated subjects, subjects treated using antihypertensive medication; Untreated subjects, subjects not treated using antihypertensive medication. Numbers inside bars indicate 95% CI. The SNBP group was treated as the reference category.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Relative hazards (RH) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of sustained normal blood pressure (SNBP), white-coat hypertension (WCHT), masked hypertension (MHT), and sustained hypertension (SHT) for risk of the composite of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality/stroke morbidity by CVD risk profile. Low-risk group, patients without history of CVD or diabetes and with no risk factors; Middle-risk group, patients without history of CVD or diabetes but with one to two risk factors; High-risk group, patients with history of CVD or diabetes or with three risk factors. Numbers inside bars indicate 95% CI. The SNBP group was treated as the reference category.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement