Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:618-624, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.061
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, G.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Oh, D.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cho, G.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Oh, D.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

Global 2-Dimensional Strain as a New Prognosticator in Patients With Heart Failure

Goo-Yeong Cho, MD, PhD*,*, Thomas H. Marwick, MD, PhD{dagger}, Hyun-Sook Kim, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Min-Kyu Kim, MD{ddagger}, Kyung-Soon Hong, MD, PhD{ddagger} and Dong-Jin Oh, MD, PhD{ddagger}

* Department of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
{dagger} Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
{ddagger} Department of Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

ACS = acute coronary syndromes; CHF = congestive heart failure; LV = left ventricular.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Incidence of Cardiac Events According to Etiology of Heart Failure

The cutoff values of global circumferential strain (GCS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were achieved by the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Prognostic Value of Echocardiographic Parameters

Incremental prognostic value of the risk factors (ratio of early transmitral flow to early diastolic annular velocity [E/e'], left ventricular ejection fraction, GLS, and GCS) by Cox proportional hazards model presented as a global chi-square value. The addition of GCS resulted in significant incremental improvement in the predictive value on the E/e', ejection fraction (EF), and GLS. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Receiver-Operating Characteristic Curves to Predict Cardiac Events

Black line = GCS; green line = GLS; red line = left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). AUC = area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve; CI = confidence interval; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Kaplan-Meier Analysis According to GCS

The cutoff value (–10.7%) was defined as the point with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity. GCS = global circumferential strain.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement