Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:346-355, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.027
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pontone, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pepi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pontone, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pepi, M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography

A Comparison Between Prospective and Retrospective Electrocardiogram Triggering

Gianluca Pontone, MD*, Daniele Andreini, MD, Antonio L. Bartorelli, MD, Sarah Cortinovis, MD, Saima Mushtaq, MD, Erika Bertella, MD, Andrea Annoni, MD, Alberto Formenti, MD, Enrica Nobili, MD, Daniela Trabattoni, MD, Piero Montorsi, MD, Giovanni Ballerini, MD, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, MD, PhD and Mauro Pepi, MD

Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, and the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Study Flow Diagram

bpm = beats/min; CT = computed tomography; HR = heart rate; i.v. = intravenous.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Spearman Correlation and Bland-Altman Analysis Between MDCT and ICA in Group 1

Spearman correlation (upper panels) and Bland-Altman analysis (lower panels) between multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for the assessment of percent stenosis of nonstented and stented segments in Group 1. Multiple overlapping data points are presented.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Spearman Correlation and Bland-Altman Analysis Between MDCT and ICA in Group 2

Spearman correlation (upper panels) and Bland-Altman analysis (lower panels) between multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for the assessment of percent stenosis of nonstented and stented segments in Group 2. Multiple overlapping data points are presented.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Case Example

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) (voltage: 120 KVp; tube current: 650 mAs; slice thickness: 0.625 mm; padding: 0) with prospective electrocardiogram triggering of a 65-year-old man with previous stenting of the left main (LM), left anterior descending (LAD), and left circumflex (LCX) coronary arteries. (Upper panels) LM, LCx, and right coronary artery (RCA) volume rendering reconstruction. (Lower panels) Multiplanar reconstruction showing no restenosis of LM and LCx stents and multiple restenoses of RCA stent (red circles). The effective dose of MDCT was 2.5 mSv.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement