Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:2277-2286, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.055
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Appendix
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hare, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hare, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, W.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Study of Intravenous Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (Prochymal) After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Joshua M. Hare, MD*,*, Jay H. Traverse, MD{dagger}, Timothy D. Henry, MD{dagger}, Nabil Dib, MD{ddagger}, Robert K. Strumpf, MD{ddagger}, Steven P. Schulman, MD§, Gary Gerstenblith, MD§, Anthony N. DeMaria, MD||, Ali E. Denktas, MD, Roger S. Gammon, MD#, James B. Hermiller, Jr, MD**, Mark A. Reisman, MD{dagger}{dagger}, Gary L. Schaer, MD{ddagger}{ddagger} and Warren Sherman, MD§§

* Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division and the Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
{dagger} Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
{ddagger} Arizona Heart Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
§ The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
|| University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
University of Texas Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas
# Heart Hospital of Austin, Austin, Texas
** The Care Group, LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana
{dagger}{dagger} Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
{ddagger}{ddagger} Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
§§ New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Time After MI to Infusion of Study Agent

Human mesenchymal stem cells = solid bars; placebo = open bars. MI = myocardial infarction.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Percentage of Patients With >10 PVCs per Hour

Human mesenchymal stem cells = green line (n = 32 at 3 months, n = 33 at 6 months); placebo = red line (n = 19 at 3 months, n = 16 at 6 months). *p = 0.001 by repeated measure analysis of variance; {dagger}p < 0.05 versus days 1 and 90; {ddagger}p = 0.017 versus placebo. PVC = premature ventricular contraction.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Increase From Baseline Values in Percent LVEF at 3 and 6 Months Post-Treatment in Patients With Anterior MI

Human mesenchymal stem cells = solid bars (n = 17 at 3 months, n = 15 at 6 months); placebo = open bars (n = 10 at 3 months, n = 9 at 6 months). *p = 0.0436 at 6 months for human mesenchymal stem cell-treated patients versus baseline, analysis of variance. LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; MI = myocardial infarction.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Impact of hMSC Treatment on LVEF Evaluated by Cardiac MRI

Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) = green line (n = 21 at 3 months, n = 18 at 6 and 12 months); placebo = red line (n = 13 at 3 months, n = 11 at 6 and 12 months). *p = 0.003 by repeated measure analysis of variance; {dagger}p = 0.005 versus baseline. Abbreviations as in Figure 3.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Impact of hMSC Treatment on LV Remodeling

Changes in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) are plotted against the changes in LV end-systolic volume (ESV) (A) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) (B) during follow-up. Human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) patients (n = 21 at 3 months, n = 18 at 6 and 12 months) exhibit evidence of reverse remodeling with no increase in LV EDV and a decline in LV ESV, whereas placebo patients (n = 13 at 3 months, n = 11 at 6 and 12 months) demonstrate evidence of LV chamber enlargement. *p = 0.005 versus baseline.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6 Difference From Baseline in FEV1 % Predicted

Human mesenchymal stem cells = green line (n = 31); placebo = red line (n = 18). Error bars represent standard error of the mean. *p = 0.003 by repeated measure analysis of variance; {dagger}p = 0.01 versus placebo. FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 s.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7 Percentage of Patients With Improved Global Assessment

Human mesenchymal stem cells = green line; placebo = red line. *p = 0.027 between groups, Fisher exact test; {dagger}p = 0.016 versus day 10, Fisher exact test.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement