Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1872-1882, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.071
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahmarian, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahmarian, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

The Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Provide Independent and Complementary Prediction of Cardiac Risk

Su Min Chang, MD, Faisal Nabi, MD, Jiaqiong Xu, PhD, Leif E. Peterson, PhD, Arup Achari, MD, Craig M. Pratt, MD and John J. Mahmarian, MD*

Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center and The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Relation Between CACS and SPECT Results

Relation between coronary artery calcium score (CACS) severity and stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) results in 717 subjects who underwent both tests within 6 months. The percentage of subjects with an abnormal SPECT result (p < 0.001) and those with a large stress-induced total (≥15%) and ischemic (≥10%) left ventricular (LV) perfusion defect size (PDS) (p < 0.001) significantly increased with increasing CACS severity.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Event Rates Based on CACS Severity

Total cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and coronary revascularization (A) and all-cause death/MI (B) event rates based on CACS severity. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Event Rates Based on SPECT Results: Total Perfusion Defect Size

Total cardiac death, MI, and coronary revascularization (A) and all-cause death/MI (B) event rates based on stress SPECT results of normal, abnormal with an LV PDS <15%, and abnormal with an LV PDS ≥15%. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Event Rates Based on SPECT Results: Ischemic Perfusion Defect Size

Total cardiac death, MI, and coronary revascularization (A) and all-cause death/MI (B) event rates based on stress SPECT results of normal, abnormal with a <10% ischemic PDS, and abnormal with a ≥10% ischemic PDS. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Adjusted Annualized Event Rates Based on CACS and SPECT Results

Adjusted annualized total cardiac death, MI, and coronary revascularization (A) and all-cause death/MI (B) event rates based on CACS and SPECT results. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6 Event Rates in Subjects With a Normal SPECT Result Based on CACS Severity

Total cardiac death, MI, and coronary revascularization (A) and all-cause death/MI (B) event rates based on CACS severity in subjects with a normal stress SPECT result. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7 Incremental Prognostic Value of Clinical, SPECT, and CACS Results

Incremental predictive value of CACS and stress SPECT results over clinical information by global chi-square analysis. (A and B) Total PDS was used as the SPECT variable. (C and D) Ischemic perfusion defect size (IPDS) was used as the SPECT variable. Clinical model: age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking history, family history of coronary artery disease, chest pain, abnormal resting electrocardiogram, and inability to exercise. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement