Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1787-1794, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.036
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. M.S.
Right arrow Articles by Choudhury, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. M.S.
Right arrow Articles by Choudhury, R. P.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

Effects of High-Dose Modified-Release Nicotinic Acid on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Function

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Justin M.S. Lee, MB, BCh*, Matthew D. Robson, PhD*, Ly-Mee Yu, MSc{dagger}, Cheerag C. Shirodaria, MD*, Colin Cunnington, MBBS*, Ilias Kylintireas, MD*, Janet E. Digby, PhD*, Thomas Bannister, BA*, Ashok Handa, MB, BS{ddagger}, Frank Wiesmann, MD*, Paul N. Durrington, MD§, Keith M. Channon, MD*, Stefan Neubauer, MD* and Robin P. Choudhury, DM*,*

* Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford and Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), Oxford, United Kingdom
{dagger} Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
{ddagger} Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
§ Cardiovascular Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Patient Flow Through the Trial

MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Effects of NA Treatment on Change in Mean Wall Area of the Carotid Arteries Quantified by MRI

Bars indicate mean (SD) combined change for the right and left carotid arteries at 6 months (open bars) and 12 months (solid bars). Within group, the mean change in carotid wall area at 12 months was –1.1 ± 2.6 mm2 for nicotinic acid (NA) and +1.2 ± 3.0 mm2 for placebo. For the primary end point, the NA group had significantly greater change in carotid wall area at 12 months compared with placebo (adjusted treatment difference: –1.64 mm2 [95% confidence interval: –3.12 to –0.16]; p = 0.03). MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Atheroma Regression and Progression

Magnetic resonance images of carotid arteries in cross section, obtained at baseline and at 12 months, showing atheroma progression and regression in placebo and nicotinic acid-treated patients.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Change in Carotid Wall Area Versus HDL-C and LDL-C

(A) Scatterplot of 12-month change in carotid wall area (CWA) versus 12-month change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). (B) Scatterplot of 12-month change in CWA versus 12-month change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Open circles indicate placebo group and solid circles nicotinic acid-treated group.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement