Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1730-1734, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.070
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roman, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, B. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roman, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Howard, B. V.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

High Central Pulse Pressure Is Independently Associated With Adverse Cardiovascular Outcome

The Strong Heart Study

Mary J. Roman, MD*,*, Richard B. Devereux, MD*, Jorge R. Kizer, MD, MSc*, Peter M. Okin, MD*, Elisa T. Lee, PhD{dagger}, Wenyu Wang, PhD{dagger}, Jason G. Umans, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Darren Calhoun, PhD{ddagger} and Barbara V. Howard, PhD{ddagger}

* Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
{dagger} Center for American Indian Health Research, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
{ddagger} Medstar Research Institute, Washington, DC


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Hazards Ratios for Incident Cardiovascular Event

Hazards ratios for incident cardiovascular events in 2,405 individuals initially free of clinical cardiovascular disease are stratified by quartiles of brachial (hatched bars) and central aortic (solid bars) pulse pressures (PPs). Quartiles of central PP (p < 0.001) predicted outcome more strongly than quartiles of brachial PP (p = 0.052). Only the event rate in the fourth central PP quartile (PP ≥50 mm Hg) was significantly higher than in the first quartile (p = 0.003).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Box Plots of Brachial PP per Quartile of Central Aortic PP

Box plots (median, quartiles, and range) of brachial pulse pressure (PP) stratified by quartile of central aortic PP demonstrate substantial overlap of brachial PP values across quartiles and highlight the inability to accurately estimate central pressure from brachial pressure.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement