Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1619-1626, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.097
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Terrovitis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Marbán, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Terrovitis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Marbán, E.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

Noninvasive Quantification and Optimization of Acute Cell Retention by In Vivo Positron Emission Tomography After Intramyocardial Cardiac-Derived Stem Cell Delivery

John Terrovitis, MD*, Riikka Lautamäki, MD, PhD§, Michael Bonios, MD{dagger}, James Fox, BS||, James M. Engles, MS, MBA§, Jianhua Yu, BS||, Michelle K. Leppo, BS{dagger}, Martin G. Pomper, MD, PhD||, Richard L. Wahl, MD§, Jurgen Seidel, PhD{ddagger}, Benjamin M. Tsui, PhD||, Frank M. Bengel, MD§, M. Roselle Abraham, MD{dagger} and Eduardo Marbán, MD, PhD*,*

* The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
{dagger} Department of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
{ddagger} Department of Diagnostic Imaging Physics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
§ Department of Nuclear Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
|| Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland


Figure 1
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Detection of 18FDG Labeled Cells Injected in the Myocardium by Micro-PET

(A) Transverse, (B) coronal, (C) sagittal image orientation. In a different experiment, fusion of computed tomography (CT) and micro-positron computed tomography (PET) images provides more detailed anatomical information. (D) Transverse, (E) coronal, (F) sagittal image orientation. 13NH3 = 13N-ammonia; 18FDG = [18F]-fluoro-deoxy-glucose.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Retention of Intramyocardially Injected Cells at 60 min After Cell Injection, in the Different Experimental Groups

The p values correspond to comparisons between the cells in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and the intervention groups. Values are reported as mean ± SD. Aden = adenosine; BDM = 2,3-butanedione-2-monoxime; FG = fibrin glue.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Retention of Intramyocardially Injected Cells 60 min After Cell Injection Measured by In Vivo PET and Real-Time Quantitative PCR

Cells in phosphate buffered saline group-values are reported as mean ± SD. PCR = polymerase chain reaction; PET = positron computed tomography.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Comparison of Engraftment at 3 Weeks Between the Cells in PBS and FG Groups

Assessment by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, values are reported as mean ± SD. FG = fibrin glue; PBS = phosphate-buffered saline.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Immunocytochemistry of Frozen Cardiac Sections at 3 Weeks After Cell Injection

The presence of enhanced green fluorescent protein positive cells (green) at the infarct border zone (red: troponin I), in an animal of the fibrin glue group, was revealed.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6 Percent Change in FAC Between Days 2 and 21 After Myocardial Infarction, in Animals Treated With Cells in PBS, Cells and FG, PBS Only, and FG Only

One-way analysis of variance, p = 0.002. The p values on the figure correspond to post hoc comparisons between the PBS only and the intervention groups. Values are reported as mean ± SEM. FAC = fractional area change; other abbreviations as in Figures 2 and 3.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement