Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1450-1456, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.009
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scharf, C.
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scharf, C.
Right arrow Articles by Morady, F.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using Multielectrode Catheters and Duty-Cycled Radiofrequency Energy

Christoph Scharf, MD*,*, Lucas Boersma, MD{dagger}, Wyn Davies, MD{ddagger}, Prapa Kanagaratnam, PhD{ddagger}, Nicholas S. Peters, MD{ddagger}, Vince Paul, MD§, Edward Rowland, MD§, Andrew Grace, MD||, Simon Fynn, MD||, Lam Dang, PhD*, Hakan Oral, MD and Fred Morady, MD

* Cardiovascular Center, Clinic im Park, Zurich, Switzerland
{dagger} St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
{ddagger} St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
§ St. George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
|| Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan


Figure 1
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 PVAC

The pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) is a decapolar, circular, over-the-wire mapping and ablation catheter designed for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Stability is provided by the guiding wire advanced into the pulmonary vein (PV), whereas the catheter itself is positioned at different aspects of the PV antrum for mapping and ablation. Note the noise created by the phasing of radiofrequency (RF) energy through the ablation electrodes and the marked circumferential electrogram voltage reduction after 1 min of RF ablation. CS = decapolar coronary sinus electrode with proximal and distal pairs.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 MASC

The multiarray septal catheter (MASC) has 3 arms with 4 electrodes each on the backside and is applied by pullback through the transseptal puncture to the left atrial septum. The electrodes have cooling fins to prevent heating during 1:1 unipolar/bipolar duty-cycled RF delivery. Note the noise created by the phasing of RF energy through the ablation electrodes and the marked electrogram voltage reduction after 1 min of RF ablation. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 MAAC

The multiarray atrial ablation catheter (MAAC) has 2 electrodes on each of 4 arms, which are designed to prevent perforation and to ablate complex fractionated atrial electrograms in the atrium. Cooling fins prevent overheating. Note the noise created by the phasing of RF energy through the ablation electrodes and the marked electrogram voltage reduction after 1 min of RF ablation on the chosen channels 1, 2, and 4. MAAC3 was not chosen for ablation, because electrograms were not present on this pair of electrodes due to lack of contact. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Power Output and Current Density of Multipolar Electrodes in Comparison With Standard 4-mm Tip Electrode

Technical details of multielectrodes delivering duty-cycled RF in comparison with a standard 4-mm tip unipolar electrode. Despite lower power output, the calculated current densities are comparable because of the lower surface area of the smaller electrodes. Note also the cooling fins on the backside of the smaller multielectrodes (MASC and MAAC). Abbreviations as in Figures 1, 2, and 3.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement