Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:1271-1279, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.060
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Appendix
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marcoff, L.
Right arrow Articles by Weintraub, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marcoff, L.
Right arrow Articles by Weintraub, W. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Cost Effectiveness of Enoxaparin in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

The ExTRACT–TIMI 25 (Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 25) Study

Leo Marcoff, MD*, Zugui Zhang, PhD*, Wei Zhang, MS*, Edward Ewen, MD*, Claudine Jurkovitz, MD, MPH*, Prisca Leguet, PharmD{dagger}, Paul Kolm, PhD* and William S. Weintraub, MD*,*

* Christiana Care Center for Outcomes Research, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware
{dagger} Sanofi-Aventis, Paris, France


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Cost-Effectiveness Plane for the 30-Day Analysis

Scatterplot of the joint distribution of cost and effectiveness differences in the cost-effectiveness plane for the 30-day analysis. UFH = unfractionated heparin.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Cost-Effectiveness Plane and Acceptability Curve for the Lifetime Analysis

Scatterplot of the joint distribution of cost and effectiveness differences in the (A) cost-effectiveness plane and (B) acceptability curve for the lifetime analysis. ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; UFH = unfractionated heparin.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Sensitivity Analysis

Sensitivity analysis showing the effect of the additional 10% to 40% increase or decrease of life-years gained (LYG) for enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The black line indicates ICER in LYG; the fuschia line indicates ICER in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis

Contour plot of simulated distribution of mean differences in cost and effectiveness on the basis of (A) the probabilistic sensitivity analysis over a lifetime and (B) the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; QALY = quality-adjusted life-years; UFH = unfractionated heparin.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement