Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54:877-885, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.080
© 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, R. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, R. O., III
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

Microvascular Angina and the Continuing Dilemma of Chest Pain With Normal Coronary Angiograms

Richard O. Cannon, III, MD*

Translational Medicine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Contribution of NO to Epicardial and Microvascular Coronary Tone

The effect of risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis on the change in resting coronary vascular tone with NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), an antagonist of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis. The percent change in the coronary vascular resistance, flow, and proximal and distal epicardial diameters with L-NMMA are compared in patients with ≥1 risk factor (open circles) and in patients without risk factors (solid circles). Results expressed as mean ± SEM. {dagger}p < 0.02 denotes differences in the response to L-NMMA by repeat-measures analysis of variance between patients with and patients without risk factors. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 denote differences between rest and post–L-NMMA measurements in each group. Reprinted, with permission, from Quyyumi et al. (31).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Atherosclerosis Risk Factors and Coronary Tone During Endothelial Stimulation

The impact of risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis on the vascular effects of acetylcholine before and after inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis with NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA). The percent change in the coronary vascular resistance, flow, and proximal and distal epicardial diameters with acetylcholine are compared in patients with ≥1 risk factor (open circles) and in patients without risk factors (solid circles) for atherosclerosis. Responses to the peak dose of acetylcholine are compared before and after L-NMMA in the 2 groups. Results expressed as mean ± SEM. {dagger}p < 0.03 denotes differences in the response to acetylcholine between patients with and patients without risk factors. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 denote differences between control and post–L-NMMA measurements in each group. Reprinted, with permission, from Quyyumi et al. (31).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Left Ventricular Functional Responses to Stress

Comparison of the quantitative myocardial response to the infusion of incremental doses of dobutamine in healthy control subjects (open circles) and in patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms (solid circles). Results expressed as mean ± SEM. The p value corresponds to comparison of the different responses by repeat-measures analysis of variance. Reprinted, with permission, from Panza et al. (56). NS = not significant.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Chest Pain During Cardiac Catheterization: The Sensitive Heart

Prevalence of typical chest pain experienced during cardiac catheterization in 36 patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms (CPNCA), 44 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and 10 patients with valvular heart disease (VHD) provoked by pacing from apex of right ventricle at 5 beats over resting heart rate and/or injection of contrast media into the left coronary artery. Adapted and reprinted with permission from Cannon et al. (64).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Microvascular Angina: Connecting the Dots

Future research should establish a coherent pathophysiology that links coronary microvascular dysfunction with myocardial ischemia. For the diagnosis to be clinically relevant, testing that separates those patients whose symptoms are caused by myocardial ischemia from those whose pain is nonischemic should be validated by multiple groups, and strategies for effective management must be supported by randomized clinical trials. CV = cardiovascular.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement