Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 52:767-778, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.028
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Related Cardiosource Journal Scan
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buck, T.
Right arrow Articles by Erbel, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Buck, T.
Right arrow Articles by Erbel, R.

Effect of Dynamic Flow Rate and Orifice Area on Mitral Regurgitant Stroke Volume Quantification Using the Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area Method

Thomas Buck, MD, FACC, FESC*,*, Björn Plicht, MD*, Philipp Kahlert, MD*, Ingmar M. Schenk, MD*, Peter Hunold, MD{dagger} and Raimund Erbel, MD, FACC, FESC*

* Department of Cardiology, West German Heart Center Essen, Essen, Germany
{dagger} Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Clinic Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.


Figure 1
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Principles of PISA Methods

Case example of a 17-year-old patient with severe dilated cardiomyopathy and functional MR. (A, top) The PISA-VTI method; midsystolic PISA at a Nyquist setting of –15.4 cm/s in 4-chamber view with PISA radius r for calculation of MRSV (14.9 ml) (right). (A, bottom) Continuous-wave Doppler spectrum of regurgitant flow with determination of peak velocity (Vmax) and VTI. (B) Serial PISA method. Six serial PISAs throughout systole at a frame rate of 18 frames/s, with calculated MRSV of 22.2 ml (right). Note the decrease of PISA size in midsystole. (C) M-mode PISA method. M-mode registration of PISA with typical midsystolic trough. The gray curved line indicates the leaflet level. The white box illustrates volumetry of the M-mode PISA by method of discs (using Philips EnConcert offline analysis software, Philips Medical Systems, Andover, Massachusetts) to derive r2 mean. Calculated MRSV was 27.9 ml. Length (PISA) = length of M-mode proximal isovelocity surface area in cm; MR = mitral regurgitation; MRSV = mitral regurgitant stroke volume; PISA = proximal isovelocity surface area; t (PISA) = time of mitral regurgitation duration in seconds; Vol (PISA) = M-mode proximal isovelocity surface area volume in ml; VTI = velocity–time integral.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Comparison of MRSV by the 4 PISA Approaches to Reference Values by MRI

(Left) Linear regression analysis; (right) Bland-Altman analysis of agreement. Data point symbols and regression line patterns: triangles and dash-dot line = convex dynamic MR pattern; squares and long-dashed line = flat pattern; circles and short-dashed line = concave pattern; solid line = total regression line over all 73 measurement results; thin medium-dashed line = line of identity (y = x). MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Comparison of MRSV and EROA by the 4 PISA Approaches to PISA Reference Values

For data point symbols and regression line patterns, see Figure 2. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Plots of Dynamic Variations of MRFR, Regurgitant Velocity, and EROA in 3 Different Patterns of Dynamic MR

(A) Flat pattern with constant PISA radius in a patient with degenerative MR. (B) Convex pattern with midsystolic peak of PISA radius in a patient with post-myocarditis MR. (C) Concave pattern with midsystolic trough of PISA radius in a patient with functional MR. Reference mean EROA (ref) was determined as the mean of instantaneous EROAs (triangles), those being derived from superposition of M-mode PISA and continuous-wave Doppler signal and dividing instantaneous MRFR (squares) by the simultaneous continuous-wave Doppler velocity (circles) as shown in the left top and second top panel. The MRSV by PISA reference approach is derived from reference mean EROA x VTI. Values of calculated mean EROAs by PISA-VTI, M-mode PISA, and serial PISA were obtained by dividing calculated MRSV by VTI and superimposed to PISA reference values, respectively. Because MRSV results for PISA-VTI and simplified PISA were very similar, analysis of dynamic variations is only shown for PISA-VTI. Note that only the convex M-mode PISA pattern (B) is ideal for single-point PISA applications because instantaneous EROAs are relatively constant throughout the period of regurgitation. In the flat and concave patterns (A, C) there is a strong dynamic variation of instantaneous EROAs preventing correct estimation of mean EROA by single-point PISA. The concave pattern (C) causes the greatest error of single-point PISA, particularly when the largest PISA radius (encircled peak MRFR) during systole is used instead of midsystolic PISA radius (encircled midsystole MRFR). EROA = effective regurgitant orifice area; MRFR = mitral regurgitant flow rate; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement