Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 52:181-189, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.006
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nijveldt, R.
Right arrow Articles by van Rossum, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nijveldt, R.
Right arrow Articles by van Rossum, A. C.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Functional Recovery After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Comparison Between Angiography, Electrocardiography, and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Measures of Microvascular Injury

Robin Nijveldt, MD*,§,*, Aernout M. Beek, MD*, Alexander Hirsch, MD§,||, Martin G. Stoel, MD, Mark B.M. Hofman, PhD{dagger}, Victor A.W.M. Umans, MD, PhD#, Paul R. Algra, MD, PhD**, Jos W.R. Twisk, PhD{ddagger} and Albert C. van Rossum, MD, PhD*,§

* Department of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
{dagger} Department of Physics and Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
{ddagger} Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
§ Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands
|| Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Department of Cardiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
# Department of Cardiology, Medical Center Alkmaar, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
** Department of Radiology, Medical Center Alkmaar, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Changes in Global Left Ventricular Volumes and Function According to Late MVO Status

Changes in global left ventricular volumes and function from baseline to follow-up in patients without microvascular obstruction (MVO) (open squares) and with MVO (solid squares). Base = baseline; FU = follow-up.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Changes in Regional Wall Thickness and Function in Dysfunctional Segments According to Infarct Transmurality and Presence of Late MVO

Change of end-diastolic and end-systolic regional wall thickness (A and B) and of wall thickening (C) in dysfunctional segments between baseline and follow-up according to transmural extent of infarction. (D) Complete recovery at follow-up of dysfunctional segments according to baseline transmural extent of infarction in patients without microvascular obstruction (MVO) (open squares) and with MVO (solid squares).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Example of Gadolinium-Enhanced Images of the Same Patient With MVO at Different Time Points After Contrast Administration, Showing the Decline of the MVO Region

(A) Short-axis first-pass perfusion image 1.5 min after contrast bolus injection, with transmural hypoenhancement in the inferolateral region (arrows). (B to F) Corresponding 3-chamber LGE images which transect A at the dotted line, acquired 10 min (B), 15 min (C), 20 min (D), 30 min (E), and 40 min (F) after contrast administration.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement