Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 52:1450-1455, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.048
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshizumi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshizumi, T.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

Radiation Dose Reduction and Coronary Assessability of Prospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography

Comparison With Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Helical Scan

Takao Maruyama, MD, PhD*,*, Masanori Takada, MD*, Toshiaki Hasuike, MD*, Atsushi Yoshikawa, MD*, Eiji Namimatsu, RT{dagger} and Tohru Yoshizumi, RT*,{ddagger}

Department of Cardiology, Kawasaki Hospital, Kobe, Japan
{dagger} Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Hospital, Kobe, Japan
{ddagger} Department of Internal Medicine and Molecular Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Study Protocol

CT = computed tomography; Recon. = reconstruction.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Schematic Illustration of Radiation Exposure in Helical Scan and Prospective Gating

(A) Helical scan; (B) prospective gating. ECG = electrocardiogram.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Reconstructed Coronary Images of Helical Scan and Prospective Gating

(A) Curved multiplanar reformatted and cross-sectional images by helical scan. Left anterior descending artery of 58-year-old man who was suspected of exhibiting effort angina is shown, and a partially calcified plaque was observed (arrow). Estimated effective dose: 22.8 mSv. (B) Selective angiography of the same patient. Moderate coronary stenosis is observed in the same position as in panel A as detected by multidetector (row) computed tomography coronary angiography. A myocardial perfusion test revealed no ischemia (not shown); therefore, this patient was treated medically. (C) Multidetector (row) computed tomography coronary angiography follow-up by prospective gating 6 months after angiography in the same patient. Similar image quality was obtained. Estimated effective dose: 4.0 mSv.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Patient-Based Coronary Assessability

Prevalence of patients in whom all coronary artery segments were assessable is shown.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement