Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 52:1160-1167, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.059
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Related Cardiosource Journal Scan
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Katus, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Steen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Katus, H. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

Prevalence of Different Gadolinium Enhancement Patterns in Patients After Heart Transplantation

Henning Steen, MD, Constanze Merten, MD, Sonja Refle, MD, Roland Klingenberg, MD, Thomas Dengler, MD, Evangelos Giannitsis, MD* and Hugo A. Katus, MD

Abteilung Innere Medizin III, Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Distribution and Percentage of Murality of Myocardial Infarctions in Transplant Coronary Artery Disease I to III

Infarct-typical (A, B) and -atypical (C to F) contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging patterns. The red arrows point to the contrast-enhanced lesions.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Distribution and Percentage of Typical and Atypical Late Enhancement in TCAD I to III

(A) Comparison of the percentage of patients with infarct-typical contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) and their distribution and murality of myocardial infarction in all 3 transplant coronary artery disease (TCAD) groups. Note the significant increase of infarct-typical lesions from TCAD I to III. The transmurality index was at least 25% to 50%. (B) Comparison of the percentage of patients with infarct-atypical CE-MRI and their distribution in all 3 TCAD groups. For infarct-atypical CE-MRI the presence of CE-MRI was evenly distributed among the groups. LE = late enhancement.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Distribution Patterns of Infarct-Typical and -Atypical CE-MRI

Distribution of all affected infarct-typical (A) and -atypical (B) contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) segments related to the American Heart Association 17-segment model. Of infarct-typical lesions, 81% were accentuated in the mid-ventricular (segments VII to XII) and apical (XIII to XVII) segments. In contrast, 60% of infarct-atypical areas were accentuated at basal slices, predominantly lateral and inferior. *Segment XVII.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement