Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:956-964, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.062 (Published online 7 February 2008).
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abbate, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vetrovec, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Abbate, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vetrovec, G. W.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Survival and Cardiac Remodeling Benefits in Patients Undergoing Late Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of the Infarct-Related Artery

Evidence From a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Antonio Abbate, MD*,*, Giuseppe G.L. Biondi-Zoccai, MD{dagger}, Darryn L. Appleton, MBChB*, Paul Erne, MD{ddagger}, Andreas W. Schoenenberger, MD§, Michael J. Lipinski, MD||, Pierfrancesco Agostoni, MD, Imad Sheiban, MD{dagger} and George W. Vetrovec, MD, FACC*

* Virginia Commonwealth University–VCU Pauley Heart Center, Richmond, Virginia
{dagger} Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
{ddagger} Division of Cardiology, Kantonsspital Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland
§ Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
|| Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium.


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Individual and Pooled Risks of Adverse Outcomes

Forest plots showing individual and pooled risks of death (A), death, and nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction (B), death, nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction, or rehospitalization for angina/heart failure (C), and nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction (D) comparing late percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus best medical therapy (Rx) only for infarct-related artery occlusion late (>12 h) in the course of acute myocardial infarction. ALKK = Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte; BRAVE-2 = Beyond 12 Hours Reperfusion Alternative Evaluation Trial; CI = confidence interval; DEPOCI = Randomized Trial of Occluded Artery Angioplasty After Acute Myocardial Infarction; OAT = Occluded Artery Trial; OR = odds ratio; SWISSI II = Swiss Interventional Study on Silent Ischemia Type II; TOAT = The Occluded Artery Trial; TOMIIS = Total Occlusion Post-Myocardial Infarction Intervention Study; TOPS = Treatment of Post-thrombolytic Stenoses.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Individual and Pooled Group Differences in Changes in Cardiac Function and Remodeling

Forest plot showing individual and pooled changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume index, and end-systolic volume index at follow-up comparing late PCI versus best medical therapy only for infarct-related artery occlusion late (>12 h) in the course of acute myocardial infarction. (A) Shows a +4% change in left ventricular ejection fraction favoring PCI. (B and C) Show a significant greater decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index and left ventricular end-systolic volume index in the PCI, showing a more favorable remodeling pattern with PCI. TOSCA-2 = Total Occlusion Study of Canada; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Lack of Small Study Bias

Funnel plot of study effect (odds ratio) versus precision (standard error of log-transformed odds ratio) suggests the lack of small study bias (p = 0.896 at Peters’ test).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Correlation Between Length of Follow-Up and Changes in Cardiac Function

Meta-regression represents interaction between lengths of follow-up and observed changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), showing greater benefits of late percutaneous coronary intervention with increasing duration of follow-up (p = 0.001).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement