Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:899-905, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.047
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View CVN News Brief
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelbæk, H.
Right arrow Articles by Thuesen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kelbæk, H.
Right arrow Articles by Thuesen, L.

Randomized Comparison of Distal Protection Versus Conventional Treatment in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The Drug Elution and Distal Protection in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEDICATION) Trial

Henning Kelbæk, MD*, Christian J. Terkelsen, MD{dagger}, Steffen Helqvist, MD*, Jens F. Lassen, MD{dagger}, Peter Clemmensen, MD*, Lene Kløvgaard, RN*, Anne Kaltoft, MD{dagger}, Thomas Engstrøm, MD*, Hans E. Bøtker, MD{dagger}, Kari Saunamäki, MD*, Lars R. Krusell, MD{dagger}, Erik Jørgensen, MD*, Hans-Henrik T. Hansen, MD*, Evald H. Christiansen, MD{dagger}, Jan Ravkilde, MD{dagger}, Lars Køber, MD*, Klaus F. Kofoed, MD* and Leif Thuesen, MD{dagger},*

* Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
{dagger} Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Complete ST-Segment Resolution

Cumulative frequency curves of patients achieving ≥70% resolution of the ST-segment 90 min after primary percutaneous coronary intervention show a small, insignificant difference in the 2 groups receiving distal protection and conventional treatment.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Cardiac Biomarkers and WMI

Maximal levels of cardiac biomarkers and echocardiographic determination of left ventricular wall motion index (WMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the 2 groups receiving distal protection and conventional treatment. CK-MB = creatine kinase-MB.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 MACCE After 30 Days

Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) 30 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. TLR = target lesion revascularization.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Subgroup Analyses for the Primary End Point

Subgroup analyses with regard to complete ST-segment resolution. BMS = bare-metal stent; CX = circumflex coronary artery; DES = drug-eluting stent; DM = diabetes mellitus; LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery; RCA = right coronary artery; TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement