The Problem With Composite End Points in Cardiovascular StudiesThe Story of Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Kevin E. Kip, PhD*,*,
Kim Hollabaugh, RN, MSN ,
Oscar C. Marroquin, MD, FACC and
David O. Williams, MD, FACC
* College of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Department of Cardiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 1 Adjusted Hazard Ratios for Different MACE Definitions
Adjusted hazard ratios of different definitions of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) comparing acute myocardial infarction (MI) versus nonacute MI patients (top) and patients with multilesion versus single-lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (bottom). Filled center circles depict the adjusted hazard ratios, filled circles at the left and right ends depict the lower and upper 95% confidence limits. Revasc = revascularization; ST = stent thrombosis; TVR = target vessel revascularization.
|
|
|