Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:701-707, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.034
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kip, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, D. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kip, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, D. O.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

The Problem With Composite End Points in Cardiovascular Studies

The Story of Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Kevin E. Kip, PhD*,*, Kim Hollabaugh, RN, MSN{dagger}, Oscar C. Marroquin, MD, FACC{ddagger} and David O. Williams, MD, FACC§

* College of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
{dagger} School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
{ddagger} Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
§ Department of Cardiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Adjusted Hazard Ratios for Different MACE Definitions

Adjusted hazard ratios of different definitions of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) comparing acute myocardial infarction (MI) versus nonacute MI patients (top) and patients with multilesion versus single-lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (bottom). Filled center circles depict the adjusted hazard ratios, filled circles at the left and right ends depict the lower and upper 95% confidence limits. Revasc = revascularization; ST = stent thrombosis; TVR = target vessel revascularization.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement