Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:660-668, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.059
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Online Videos
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sieveking, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, M. K.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sieveking, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, M. K.C.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

Strikingly Different Angiogenic Properties of Endothelial Progenitor Cell Subpopulations

Insights From a Novel Human Angiogenesis Assay

Daniel P. Sieveking, BSc*,{dagger}, Andrew Buckle, PhD*, David S. Celermajer, MBBS, PhD, DSc{dagger},{ddagger} and Martin K.C. Ng, MBBS, PhD*,{dagger},{ddagger},*

* Heart Research Institute, Sydney, Australia
{dagger} Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
{ddagger} Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.


Figure 1
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 EC–Specific Human Angiogenesis Assay

(A) Light photomicrograph (x20 original magnification) of endothelial cells (ECs) forming tubular structures (arrows) when co-cultured with MRC5 fibroblasts. (B) Immunofluorescent micrograph (x20 original magnification) of EC tubules, stained for 1,1'–dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3-tetramethyl-indocarbocyanine perchlorate labeled acetylated low-density lipoprotein (Dil-AcLDL) (red), Ulex europaeus agglutinin lectin (UEA-1) (green), and counterstained with 4ni, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue). (C) Light photomicrograph (x10 original magnification) ECs stained for CD31 (brown) (arrows) failed to form tubules when cultured on smooth muscle cells.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Angiogenic Responsiveness of Angiogenesis Assay

(A) Representative binarized photomicrographs and (B) quantification of tubulogenesis in response to treatment. Data expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 versus control. VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Late-OECs Not Early EPCs Form Tubules De Novo

Representative immunofluorescent micrographs of (A) early EPCs and (B) OECs were co-cultured with MRC5 fibroblasts and stained as in Figure 1B. EPC = endothelial progenitor cell; OEC = late-outgrowth endothelial cell.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Early EPCs Do Not Incorporate Into Vascular Networks

(A) Early EPCs were pre-tagged with CellTracker 5-(((4-Chloromethyl)benzoyl)amine)tetramethyl rhodamine (red), co-cultured with differentiated ECs, then co-cultures were stained with UEA-1, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (green), and 4ni, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (blue). (B and C) Three-dimensional z-stacking micrograph showing a tagged early EPC and differentiated EC tubule in separate focal planes (white lines above and right of the images represent position in the z axis). Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 3.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 OECs Incorporate Into Vascular Networks

Co-cultures were stained according to Figure 4. Pre-tagged OECs directly incorporated into developing vascular networks at (A) x20 magnification and (B) x40 magnification. (C) Three-dimensional z-stacking micrograph shows 2 tagged OECs directly incorporated into surrounding differentiated EC tubules in the same focal plane (white lines above and right of the images represent position in the z axis). Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 3.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6 Early EPCs Augment Angiogenesis

Early endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) augmented angiogenesis by differentiated endothelial cells (ECs) in a dose-dependent fashion. Data expressed as the mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.001 for each concentration of early EPCs versus control. CTRL = control.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7 Early EPCs and Not OECs Augment Angiogenesis in a Paracrine Fashion

(A) A transwell apparatus was used to assess the paracrine effects of different EPCs. (B) Early EPCs, still exerted a dose-dependent proangiogenic effect when placed in transwells (TW) (p = 0.01 by analysis of variance). (C) The OECs did not exert proangiogenic effects when placed in transwells (p = 0.3 by analysis of variance). Data expressed as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus control. CTRL = control; other abbreviations as in Figure 3.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement