Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:2241-2249, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.065
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaseghi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shivkumar, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vaseghi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Shivkumar, K.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Supraventricular Tachycardia After Orthotopic Cardiac Transplantation

Marmar Vaseghi, MD*, Noel G. Boyle, MD, PhD*, Rohit Kedia, MD*, Jignesh K. Patel, MD, PhD{dagger}, David A. Cesario, MD, PhD*, Isaac Wiener, MD*, Jon A. Kobashigawa, MD{dagger} and Kalyanam Shivkumar, MD, PhD*,*

* UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
{dagger} UCLA Heart Transplant Program, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Incidence of Atrial Flutter Versus Atrial Fibrillation

In the cohort of cardiac transplant patients, the percentage of patients with any atrial flutter and fibrillation as well as the individual arrhythmias associated with the appropriate clinical setting are shown. Stable was defined as those without simultaneous severe transplant vasculopathy, sepsis, or acute rejection who are not in the immediate post-operative period while experiencing the arrhythmia as shown. Note that no atrial fibrillation was observed in stable cardiac transplant patients. In comparison, atrial flutter occurred in 4.6% of patients and, in 2.3%, required electrophysiological study and ablation. AFib = atrial fibrillation; Aflutter = atrial flutter.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Classification of SVT in Stable OHT Patients

Incidence of the different types of drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in this cohort of orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) patients who underwent electrophysiological study (EPS) is shown. Note that isthmus-dependent atrial flutter was the most commonly observed SVT, followed by scar-related macro-reentrant tachycardia. AT = atrial tachycardia; AVNRT = atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; AVRT = atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Left Atrial Macro-Reentrant Tachycardia

(A) Surface electrocardiogram demonstrates atrial tachycardia at a rate of 150 beats/min. (B) Activation maps demonstrate the tachycardia using an isthmus in the left atrium (LA), just anterior to the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV), involving the donor, but not native (gray) left atrium (LA cuff tachycardia). Red marks represent ablation lesions. (C) Fluoroscopic left anterior oblique view: this tachycardia was mapped and ablated with transseptal catheterization. ABL = ablation catheter; CS = coronary sinus; LAT = left atrial tachycardia; LIPV = left inferior pulmonary vein; RA = right atrium; SCR = native atrium tagged as "scar" and shown in gray.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Atrio-Atrial Anastomosis With Donor Isthmus Right Atrial Flutter and Dissociated Native Atrial Rhythm

(A) Fluoroscopic right anterior oblique view shows the position of the duodecapolar catheter with the distal bipoles (D1 to D3) along the tricuspid valve isthmus and the proximal electrode (D10) along the superior aspect of the interatrial septum. (B) Electroanatomic maps of atrio-atrial anastomosis (gray areas identify native atrial tissue). The flutter wave-front involves the donor atrium only and is propagating in a counterclockwise fashion along the tricuspid annulus. (C) Intracardiac activation sequence in the donor atrium confirms counterclockwise activation. A critical isthmus was located near D5 in the lateral right atrium wall. The native atrium was in a dissociated atrial rhythm (D6 to D9) and did not conduct to the donor atrium. Therefore, ablation of the native atrium was not performed. CS = coronary sinus; D1 to D10 = duodecapolar bipoles 1 to 10; DDC = duodecapolar catheter; LV = left ventricle; RV = right ventricle.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 LA (LIPV-Mitral Isthmus) Flutter

(A) Activation map: the flutter circuit begins in the inferior wall of the LA (pink) close to the CS3-4 bipole and propagates across to the RA and around the tricuspid annulus as well as around and over the mitral annulus. The ablation line, shown, successfully terminated the arrhythmia without recurrence during follow-up. (B) Fluoroscopic left anterior oblique view: an ablation catheter was placed in the LA and duodecapolar catheter in the RA for mapping. (C) Intracardiac tracings corresponding to the activation map in panel A showing the earliest activation in the LA and extending to the RA. LAA = left atrial appendage; RSPV = right superior pulmonary vein; SVC = superior vena cava; other abbreviations as in Figure 3.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement