Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:2028-2033, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.002
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antman, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Braunwald, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antman, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Braunwald, E.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Early and Late Benefits of Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

A TRITON–TIMI 38 (TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) Analysis

Elliott M. Antman, MD, FACC*,*, Stephen D. Wiviott, MD*, Sabina A. Murphy, MPH*, Juri Voitk, MD, FACC{dagger}, Yonathan Hasin, MD{ddagger}, Petr Widimsky, MD, DrSc§, Harish Chandna, MBBS, FACC, William Macias, MD, PhD||, Carolyn H. McCabe, BS* and Eugene Braunwald, MD, MACC*

* Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
{dagger} North Estonian Regional Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia
{ddagger} The Kittner and Davidai Institute of Cardiology Center, Poriya, Israel
§ Cardiocenter, Charles University and University Hospital Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
Detar Hospital, Victoria, Texas
|| Eli Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana.


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Landmark Analyses of Efficacy

Landmark analyses (survival method) of the Kaplan-Meier estimates of myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and urgent target vessel revascularization (uTVR) during the first 3 days after randomization (left side of each panel) and from 3 days to the end of the study (right side of each panel) are shown for the prasugrel and clopidogrel groups. There were significant reductions in the hazard ratio (HR) for each end point both during the first 3 days and from 3 days to the end of the study that were consistent with independent superiority of the loading and maintenance doses of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Landmark Analyses of Safety and Net Clinical Benefit

Landmark analyses (survival method) of the Kaplan-Meier estimates of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major noncoronary artery bypass grafting bleeding and net clinical benefit during the first 3 days after randomization (left side of each panel) and from 3 days to the end of the study (right side of each panel) are shown for the prasugrel and clopidogrel groups. There was no significant increase in major bleeding with prasugrel during the first 3 days, but there was a significant increase from 3 days to the end of the study. Net clinical benefit favored prasugrel during both the early and late phases of the study. HR = hazard ratio.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement