Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:1967-1974, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.058
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guzman, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Qin, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Guzman, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Qin, X.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Tibial Artery Calcification as a Marker of Amputation Risk in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease

Raul J. Guzman, MD*,*, D. Marshal Brinkley, MD*, Paul M. Schumacher, MD*, Rafe M.J. Donahue, PhD{dagger}, Holly Beavers, RN* and Xiao Qin, MD{ddagger}

* Division of Vascular Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
{dagger} Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
{ddagger} Guangxi Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi, China.


Figure 1
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 TAC

Noncontrasted multislice computed tomography showing a patient without (A) and with (B) significant tibial artery calcification (TAC). Arrows identify calcified tibial arteries.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 TAC Scores by Limb Status

Tibial artery calcification (TAC) scores in patients without (control group) and with peripheral arterial disease (claudication and critical limb ischemia [CLI]). Each dot represents a single patient. Open circles represent patients who subsequently underwent major amputation. Lines represent median for each group.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Clinical Presentation by TAC Range

Patients were divided according to tibial artery calcification (TAC) categories (0 to 10, 10 to 1,000, and >1,000). Bars represent the number of patients with no disease (red bars, control group), claudication (blue bars), or critical limb ischemia (CLI) (black bars).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 ROC Analysis

Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the predictive value of tibial artery calcification (TAC) and ankle-brachial index (ABI) on major amputation (A) and on major and minor amputation (B). The black line represents the ROC curve for TAC score. The blue line represents ROC curve for ABI. The red line represents no effect. AUC = area under the curve.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5 Major Amputation Events According to TAC Score for Patients With PAD

Symptomatic vascular patients were stratified by tibial artery calcification (TAC) scores >400 or <400. Kaplan-Meier curves were derived for major amputation-free survival. The p value is derived using the log-rank test. Number of patients at risk at each time point is listed on the bottom. PAD = peripheral arterial disease.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement