A Randomized Comparison of Triple-Site Versus Dual-Site Ventricular Stimulation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure
Christophe Leclercq, MD, PhD*,*,
Fredrik Gadler, MD, PhD ,
Wolfgang Kranig, MD ,
Sue Ellery, MD ,
Daniel Gras, MD||,
Arnaud Lazarus, MD¶,
Jacques Clémenty, MD#,
Eric Boulogne, MSc**,
Jean-Claude Daubert, MD* for the TRIP-HF (Triple Resynchronization In Paced Heart Failure Patients) Study Group
* CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Schüchtermann-Klinik, Bad Rothenfelde, Germany
Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne, United Kingdom
|| NCN, Nantes, France
¶ InParys, Paris, France
# Hopital Cardiologique, Bordeaux, France
** St. Jude Medical, Zaventem, Belgium.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 4 Evolution of Mean Z Ratio Between Patient Enrollment and End of Follow-Up in Each Study Group
In both groups, after the stabilization phase, the Z ratio increased during the period of triple-site biventricular stimulation, and decreased during dual-site stimulation. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.
|
|

View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 5 Evolution of Mean LVEF Between Patient Enrollment and End of Follow-Up in Each Study Group
In both groups, after the stabilization phase, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased during the period of triple-site biventricular stimulation and decreased during dual-site stimulation. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.
|
|
|