Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:1357-1365, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.073
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daubert, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Daubert, J. P.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks in MADIT II

Frequency, Mechanisms, Predictors, and Survival Impact

James P. Daubert, MD*,*, Wojciech Zareba, MD, PhD*, David S. Cannom, MD{dagger}, Scott McNitt, MS*, Spencer Z. Rosero, MD*, Paul Wang, MD{ddagger}, Claudio Schuger, MD§, Jonathan S. Steinberg, MD||, Steven L. Higgins, MD, David J. Wilber, MD#, Helmut Klein, MD**, Mark L. Andrews, BBA*, W. Jackson Hall, PhD{dagger}{dagger}, Arthur J. Moss, MD* for the MADIT II Investigators

* Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
{dagger} Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California
{ddagger} Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
§ Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
|| St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, New York
Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, California
# Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
** University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany
{dagger}{dagger} Department of Biostatistics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Survival Free of Inappropriate Shock/Therapy

(A) The cumulative proportion of patients who experienced a first inappropriate shock (due to any mechanism) is plotted versus time. (B) The cumulative proportion of patients who experienced a first inappropriate therapy, antitachycardia pacing (ATP) or shock (due to any mechanism) is plotted versus time. The number of patients at risk at a given time point of follow-up is indicated below the x axis. The proportion of the population experiencing the event in question is given in parentheses at the 1-, 2-, and 3-year time points.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Time-Dependent Occurrence of Inappropriate Shock by Type

The cumulative proportion of patients experiencing a first inappropriate (Inapp.) shock due to the 3 subcategories of inappropriate shock is plotted with respect to time. The number of patients at risk at a given time point of follow-up is indicated below the x axis. The proportion of the population experiencing the event in question is given in parentheses at the 1-, 2-, and 3-year time points. AF = atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter; ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; SVT = supraventricular tachycardia.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Ventricular Rate Precipitating Inappropriate Shock

The heart rate at the time of the ICD detection resulting in a patient’s first inappropriate shock is shown in the bar graph in groups of 10 beats/min. Atrial fibrillation episodes are shown with cross-hatched bars, and SVT episodes are shown with solid bars. Inappropriate shocks caused by abnormal sensing are excluded because the device has by definition misconstrued the actual ventricular rate (typically normal in these cases). The events relate to shocks, not patients, in this figure. Abbreviations as in figure 2.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement