Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008; 51:23-32, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.084
© 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow View Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pocock, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pocock, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stone, G. W.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Angiographic Surrogate End Points in Drug-Eluting Stent Trials

A Systematic Evaluation Based on Individual Patient Data From 11 Randomized, Controlled Trials

Stuart J. Pocock, PhD*, Alexandra J. Lansky, MD, FACC{dagger}, Roxana Mehran, MD, FACC{dagger}, Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, FACC{ddagger}, Martin P. Fahy, MSc{dagger}, Yingbo Na, MSc{dagger}, George Dangas, MD, PhD, FACC{dagger}, Jeffrey W. Moses, MD, FACC{dagger}, Tereza Pucelikova, MD{dagger}, David E. Kandzari, MD, FACC§, Stephen G. Ellis, MD, FACC, Martin B. Leon, MD, FACC{dagger} and Gregg W. Stone, MD, FACC{dagger},*

* London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
{dagger} Columbia University Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York
{ddagger} Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
§ Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Impact of Angiographic Measures on TLR

Proportion of patients with target lesion revascularization (TLR) as a function of in-stent and in-segment late loss (LL) and follow-up percent diameter stenosis (%DS), stratified by reference vessel diameter (RVD) using individual patient data from all 11 trials. Left column = observed proportions with TLR for 12 intervals of LL and 10 intervals of follow-up %DS. Right column = corresponding smoothed logistic curves.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Actual Versus Predicted Rates of TLR

Actual versus predicted rates of TLR for 22 treatment groups (13 with drug-eluting stents [DES], 9 with bare-metal stents [BMS]), using logistic models for in-stent LL (top) and follow-up %DS (bottom). Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Relationship Between Angiographic Measures and Actual TLR

Relationship of TLR to mean LL and mean follow-up %DS both in-stent and in the analysis segment for each stent treatment group in 11 randomized trials. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement