cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50:327-334, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.036 (Published online 6 July 2007).
© 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dwivedi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Senior, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dwivedi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Senior, R.

Prognostic Value of Myocardial Viability Detected by Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Early After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Girish Dwivedi, MD, MRCP, DM, Rajesh Janardhanan, MD, MRCP, Sajad A. Hayat, MBChB, MRCP, John M. Swinburn, MD, MRCP and Roxy Senior, MD, DM, FRCP, FESC, FACC*

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Northwick Park Institute of Medical Research, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, United Kingdom.


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1 Receiver-Operator Characteristic Curve

(A) Receiver-operator characteristic curve showing different cutoff points with CDI for the prediction of cardiac death. (B) Receiver-operator characteristic curve showing different cutoff points with CDI for the prediction of cardiac death or nonfatal AMI. AMI = acute myocardial infarction; CDI = contrast defect index; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve

(A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve (unadjusted) using a cutoff of CDI of 1.86 for the prediction of cardiac death. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curve using a cutoff of CDI of 1.67 for the prediction of cardiac death or nonfatal AMI. F/U = follow-up; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve

(A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve in patients with preserved LVEF (i.e., >50%) using a cutoff of CDI of 1.67 for the prediction of cardiac death or nonfatal AMI. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curve in patients with decreased LVEF (i.e., ≤50%) using a cutoff of CDI of 1.67 for the prediction of cardiac death or nonfatal AMI. LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; other abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4 Incidence of Cardiac Events in Different LVEF Groups

Occurrence of cardiac death or nonfatal AMI in various LVEF groups according to CDI. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 3.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home